Dude Weather Subscribe to Secrets Minneapolis / St. Paul

Defenestrator

Downtown Militarized Zone

Share

Photos by India Bell

Hard to believe that as recently as Sunday, downtown Saint Paul was a bucolic paradise ringed in chain link, the peace kept by strapping young men with plastic handcuffs. Sadly, the photos below didn't jibe with the reality of yesterday's protests.

While Minnesota's, and the nation's, eyes should've been turned to the potential for yet another biblical disaster visited upon New Orleans, and somewhere between 8,000 and 10,000 people marched in peaceful protest against the war in Iraq, various social injustices, and the lack of proper bagels in the Midwest, a small group of asshats were doing all they could to ensure all eyes were on them. And sadly, they didn't feel they could accomplish this by word or crappy bohemian performance art, so instead they reportedly lobbed homemade explosives, smashed windows, overturned dumpsters, attacked delegates, and generally demonstrated their complete lack of understanding of what free speech entails.

Ignoring, for a moment, the larger issue of how this group of irredeemable twats makes it virtually impossible for any of the protestors to be taken seriously, they've created a significant public safety issue for the rest of the convention. The police, having seen what lengths immature Marxist wanna-be's will go to "get their message across to the Capitalist pigs," are far more willing to deploy the more unpleasant countermeasures available to them. This has already been in ample evidence, with pepper spray used like so much Binaca and canisters of caustic gasses that some claim contain tear gas, but are more likely to have released Axe body spray into the air - a sure way to disperse a crowd. Law enforcement is already being accused of being overzealous, and it's sad that so many well-intentioned and peaceful activists are being caught up in the mess that the demonstrations have become - but it's hard to blame the police when they're forced to deal with hordes of protesters, any one of whom may want to cause harm in a variety of ways.

But on a larger scale, while no one could've possibly expected protests at the RNC to remain completely peaceful, there seems to be precious little thought actually devoted to these demonstrations. Perhaps if they were facing down tanks in Tiananmen Square, violence could be understood. But marching the virtually deserted streets of St. Paul, it does nothing to advance their cause, obscuring it with sensational headlines and stories rather than providing an opportunity for public conversation, debate and discourse. It's telling that the protesters engaged in the vandalism and violence wouldn't show their faces or grant an interview. Frankly, it's profoundly disgusting that anyone could consider this an effective, or even acceptable, form of political activism.

The only consolation I can find in this is how unlikely it is any of the asshats in question are fellow Minneapolitans, since precious few of us can actually find our way to downtown St. Paul.

2 Reader Comments

Iznogoud (not verified)05:04pm
Sep 3
I almost entirely agree with your views, and most importantly I agree with the important aspect of this, which is that violence was totally un-necessary if getting a political message across was the objective. I do not like the use of the word "protesters" in your well-expressed article, and it should be used loosely to describe the "anarchistic" elements that were among the real protesters. It is safe to assume that the people who caused -- and are causing -- harm were not protesting for any political message or against government policy, they were just "having fun".
Rich Goldsmith01:13am
Sep 5
Depends on who you talk to, actually. A lot of the folks doing it seem to feel they're making a statement against a government that ignores them and has overstepped its bounds at virtually every turn. Personally, I think they're a bunch of idiots for expressing themselves with violence that actually detracts from what is a fairly powerful message, but from a technical standpoint, it's a form of protest. Just not a very good one. Especially since idiocy begets nothing more than more idiocy.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <i> <b> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
By entering in the words in the captcha image, you help us prevent automated spam submissions and keep the site tidy.

Blogs

Sports

Baseball:
Warning Track Power by Alex Halsted
Sports:
On the Ball by Britt Robson

Society

Weather:
Dude Weather by Jimmy Gaines

A&E

Fiction:
Write Now! by Terry Faust

Retired

Hockey:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Style:
Hook & Eye
Misc:
Is This News?
Fiction:
Yo, Ivanhoe by Brad Zellar
Food:
Consider the Egg by Stephanie March
Wine:
Beyond the Cask
Food:
Food Fight!
Media:
To the Slaughter
Misc:
Outrage by Staff
Food:
Chef's Table
Guest Commentary:
Just Passing Through
Humor:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Cars:
Road Rake by Chris Birt
Commentary:
Read Menace by Tom Bartel
Society:
The Adventures of Melinda by Melinda Jacobs
Politics:
Defenestrator by Rich Goldsmith
Food:
Breaking Bread by Jeremy Iggers & Ann Bauer
Books:
Cracking Spines by Max Ross
Music:
Hear, Hear by Staff
Art:
The Vicious Circle by 6 Critics
Secrets:
Secrets of the Day by Kate Iverson
Theater:
Seen in the City by Staff
Film:
Talk About Talkies by Staff