Dude Weather Subscribe to Secrets Minneapolis / St. Paul

Cracking Spines

Eat, Drink, Read, and Dry Hump

Share

Netflix and Xbox360 have already teamed up, thank God, so you can choose from an online database of movies and watch them instantly on your TV. Big whoop, right? HBO on Demand is the same thing. Blah blah. But, Xbox being what it is, it has the oft-overlooked application of 'party mode,' wherein multiple people in multiple locales can watch the same movie at the same time and, via headset, can talk to each other throughout the film, thus simulating a community.

I mean, come on. Doesn't it seem a little like this was created for the sole purpose of talking through movies? And isn't that a little ridiculous? I understand that for nine-year-old boys whose parents won't let them go to sleepover parties this might be an important, monumental development. But whatever. Old-fashioned me can't get over the fact that it sort of defeats the purpose of watching a movie.

And then I'm thinking about book clubs, like I sometimes do. Actually, this article by Joanne Kaufman got me thinking about book clubs. Entitled 'Fought Over Any Good Books Lately?' it documents the sort of political in-fighting and general inanity that define most book club meetings (the stat is that there's roughly four or five million groups nationwide). Basically the article says that people who really want to read and discuss books are in a minority, versus those that want to network, dis on their spouses, or drink chardonnay.

I'm pretty sure this is something that all of us book group members know implicitly - and the tangential conversations are just as good (often better) than the literary ones - but it's always nice to see some snarky validation in the New York Times.

This is cute: Jocelyn Bowie of Indiana seems to have had a particularly rough time of it:

"She tried to persuade everyone to look beyond Oprah Winfrey's picks, "and they all said, 'What's wrong with Oprah?'"...The last straw came when the group picked The Da Vinci Code and someone suggested the discussion would be enriched by delving into the author's source material."

At which point the coiner of the term 'pseudo-intellectual' creamed his pants.

Generally I think book clubs are a good thing. But I am wary of them. Maybe because I view reading as a personal thing, maybe because I'm too defensive of my typically underdeveloped opinions. I like On The Road, and don't want to hear it's a piece of derivative such-and-such heavily reliant on...And while Oprah picks fantastic books, seeing her stamp on the cover of Anna Karenina or The Grapes of Wrath does diminish somewhat the joy of discovery, no?

Ah, but I digress. If the Netflix-Xbox thing totally reverses the way we watch movies, can the same be said of book clubs and the way we read? Instead of reading to...well whatever your reasons might be, does it simply become a way to impress others? I'm probably projecting a little with that one. But are book clubs meant to help a group of people really understand a novel and its significance - as an English class might - or do people join them just for a little camaraderie and maybe to release their geeky urges? Probably both, probably both.  What's interesting is that the article says groups made up of total strangers tend to last longer, as the focus is more likely to stay on books.

Why do the Twin Cities rock so hard? So many reasons, obviously. One more is because we have book clubs that take all the best criteria for what makes a good group, and then add alcohol. The Raking Through Books series and the Happy Hour Book Club combine strangers, good literature, and booze. Ch-ch-check 'em out. Sparber, if you're reading this, will you link a comment to the next MNReads meeting? With drink specials, there's always that possibility you might sloppily make out with someone who shares your thoughts on Animal Farm.

4 Reader Comments

Max Sparber  url01:11pm
Dec 11

Yes. Next time there is a MnRead's meeting, I will toss a link to it down here.

Max Ross05:10pm
Dec 11

wow i can't believe you made it to the bottom of the article.

Max Sparber  url05:30pm
Dec 11

I did an ego search on google and found it.

kissugg (not verified)12:59am
Nov 18

Ugg bailey button is now very popular. It is different from classic tall ugg and classic short uggs. You can have two styles of one ugg bailey button. And now the ugg classic cardy is also popular one. Here, grey ugg boots will be the most fashion color in this year.Welcome to shop with us. 7 days to your door. Enjoy huge discount.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <i> <b> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
By entering in the words in the captcha image, you help us prevent automated spam submissions and keep the site tidy.

Blogs

Sports

Baseball:
Warning Track Power by Alex Halsted
Sports:
On the Ball by Britt Robson

Society

Weather:
Dude Weather by Jimmy Gaines

A&E

Fiction:
Write Now! by Terry Faust

Retired

Hockey:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Style:
Hook & Eye
Misc:
Is This News?
Fiction:
Yo, Ivanhoe by Brad Zellar
Food:
Consider the Egg by Stephanie March
Wine:
Beyond the Cask
Food:
Food Fight!
Media:
To the Slaughter
Misc:
Outrage by Staff
Food:
Chef's Table
Guest Commentary:
Just Passing Through
Humor:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Cars:
Road Rake by Chris Birt
Commentary:
Read Menace by Tom Bartel
Society:
The Adventures of Melinda by Melinda Jacobs
Politics:
Defenestrator by Rich Goldsmith
Food:
Breaking Bread by Jeremy Iggers & Ann Bauer
Books:
Cracking Spines by Max Ross
Music:
Hear, Hear by Staff
Art:
The Vicious Circle by 6 Critics
Secrets:
Secrets of the Day by Kate Iverson
Theater:
Seen in the City by Staff
Film:
Talk About Talkies by Staff