Dude Weather Subscribe to Secrets Minneapolis / St. Paul

Cracking Spines

David Foster Wallace's Last Novel

David Foster Wallace's unfinished novel, The Pale King is going to be released in 2010. Little, Brown - his publisher - said it runs 'several hundred thousand words.' (Regular-size novels usually weigh in at about 75,000 words or so, I think.) The finished edition of Infinite Jest had 479,198 words, and is apparently the tenth-longest novel ever written.

It's not so surprising that his stuff is so long, though, because I'm pretty sure the man

A)    Observed and remembered everything that was within the range of his eye, and
B)    Had X-Ray vision.

Which is a pretty lethal combination. There's a lot of information to dispel into fiction when your purview includes everything. Certainly there's something a little clinical about DFW's writing. In his attempts at precision - his style is at least partly about precision, right? - he sometimes might have dried up certain emotional elements of certain sentences. But his incisiveness led to profound questions that did more to stir readers' emotions than purple prose in any shade.

According to the New Yorker, the novel's about IRS agents in the Midwest. It was unfinished when the author died, and will be published with a bunch of supplementary notes, outlines, and other material. Which, for geeks like me, is as good as porno. Also in the New Yorker - in the same article, in fact! - which hasn't even officially been published, I don't think! - is D.T. Max's mini-biography of DFW. For the fiction nut, it's definitely worth a read. For the fiction nut, that was definitely a redundant sentence, that last one there.

Okay, now I'm thinking about other unfinished novels. Why are they always so good? Kafka - did Kafka ever finish a novel? The Castle and The Trial both come equipped with a couple alternate endings, and I think Amerika was also truncated. The Man Without Qualities - which is the 2nd longest book ever written - was never completed. The Canterbury Tales. Dead Souls by Gogol. You want a Minnesota connection? Fitzgerald's The Last Tycoon. How about that? Eat it.

Really, though, what does it say when an author spends a few years - or a lot more than a few years - on a novel, and can't finish it? These guys are geniuses, some of them. If you think of a book as a way of trying to consolidate, or make sense of, the world, and then stack that up against an inability to complete it...what we're left with is what - a message about the absurdity/general entropy/meaninglessness of the universe? The impossibility of coaxing a coherent message from our lives? Man, that's heavy. Just sayin'. Does the action of not-completing a novel supercede any message of incompletion that an author might have written, anyway?

Still, if anyone could write clearly about the confusion of the universe, it would probably have been, and probably was, David Foster Wallace. Once in a while I'll pick up one of his shorter books - Oblivion, usually, or Consider the Lobster - and I find a good deal of comfort in them, not because he writes about comforting things (just the opposite), but because he is able to describe so completely a normally intangible sort of chaos that everything seems, for a little bit, to be a little less chaotic.

 

(image ripped from the new yorker, philip burke)

Billie Holiday - An Illustrated Life

It seems sometimes like Eleanora Fagan Gough suffered just so Billie Holiday could sing. After a functionally parent-less childhood that was punctuated two incidents of rape, and after working briefly at a brothel, she began performing for tips - and taking on the persona of Holiday - in New York nightclubs when she was in her late teens. The Suffering Artist is by no means a new concept, but many of our poets and singers endure a more existential, less tangible sort of pain. It's amazing Holiday made through adolescence at all, let alone with her voice, which, when considered along with the singer's biography, seems to hold years of memories within its often doleful tone.

Recently, award-winning children's author and poet Carole Boston Weatherford wrote an illustrated faux-memoir of Holiday's life. SOTC reached her by email and had a little exchange about the writing process.

This week she'll be in town, at the True Colors/Amazon Bookstore Cooperative to promote the book on Feb. 27th at 7pm, and then for a keynote speech and workshop on the 28th at the University of St. Thomas.

SOTC: A lot of your writing focuses on historical figures and events - Billie Holiday, Jesse Owens, the bombing of the 16th Street Baptist Church. How do you balance personal expression with historical explication in your poetry?

Weatherford: I try to evoke the sentiments conjured by the historic moment.

SOTC: By the same token, are you able to feel Billie Holiday's biography as something personal?

Weatherford: Billie is my muse and the poems flowed out of me as if I channeled her. She let her story come through me. I have long empathized with her.

SOTC: Would you say that politics is among your chief inspirations? Or maybe more specifically, race as it relates to politics?

Weatherford: As an author, I mine the past for family stories, fading traditions and forgotten struggles. The amazing, and at times agonizing, journey of African descendants is a source of inspiration for me.

SOTC: Be it for racial equality, social open-mindedness, or historical knowledge - do you hope to create a sort of awareness with your poetry? Do you want your readers to learn something?

Weatherford: I want my readers to sense how my subjects felt at historic junctures.

SOTC: On a personal level, when writing about a difficult topic - like the burning of a church, or the struggles of breaking through racial divides - is poetry a means for you to make peace with it?

Weatherford: Poetry is my way of honoring those who faced hardships and fought tough battles. I write of these struggles so we won't forget.

SOTC: You speak about poetry being able to turn words into music. I imagine the making of this music is an innate process - there's no formula for it, but rather it's something you have to feel out. How do you know when a line or a stanza works and when it doesn't?

Weatherford: The language has to sound right in my mind's ear. In that respect, the process is organic, second nature.

SOTC: I like the thought of turning these painful, but incredibly important, national memories into music. Do you think poeticizing the past makes it more palatable?

Weatherford: I don't want to make the past palatable.  I want it to nudge readers toward justice.  My poems are testaments from my ancestors whose voices were muted or marginalized. I write what I write because the ancestors choose to speak through me. I only hope that I do them proud.

There Was No Joy in Mudville -- an interview with local author Kurtis Scaletta

There was no joy in Mudville. Of course, they had that year where their baseball team showed promise, but then in the final game of that season, the one that could have made them town heroes, Casey struck out in the bottom of the ninth. Moundville, though, was worse.

"At least those guys got to watch a baseball game," says Roy McGuire, twelve-year-old Moundville resident and would-be catcher. After twenty-two years of perpetual rain, though, every baseball diamond in this Midwestern town has been washed out. Beyond that, there are the normal problems of economic hardship, family-abandoning parents (a set including Roy's alcoholic mother), and worst of all, the nightly trauma of enduring Roy's dad's cooking, which features dishes like Spam manicotti and fish stick casserole.

Such is the world Kurtis Scaletta has created for his debut novel, Mudville (which, just to get rid of any confusion, is about Moundville). Following in the vein of Mark Harris and John Tunis, the book fits the mold of the classic baseball novel - and does the archetype justice - full of lingo and dugout drama, and some off-the-field gravitas, to boot. When the rain finally stops, Roy and his pals immediately set about forming a squad, so they can resume a two-decades-old grudge match against rival town Sinister Bend.

Secrets of the City had the chance to sit down with Scaletta (who happens to be a prolific MNSpeaker), and chat with him a bit about the book. This Saturday, Feb 28th, he'll be at the Red Balloon Bookshop at 2 pm. 891 Grand Avenue St. Paul, MN 55105 651-224-8320

SOTC: The epigraph - "A father makes all the difference" - is from Roy Hobbs in The Natural. Is it fair to assume that Roy is named after Roy Hobbs?

Scaletta: It was a little bit of an allusion to that. It's also my middle name. Both Roy and McGuire are family names, actually. Roy was my great-grandfather, and I was named after him. My mom always told me I had to keep it in the family. If I ever have a son, though, I don't think he will be named Roy. I don't really like the name. My wife doesn't like the name. So I thought I would name a character Roy.

But I do like the fact that it's Roy Hobbs' name.

SOTC: Well that kind of kills the lead-in to my next question, but I'm going to ask it anyway. In Mudville, you mention Bernard Malamud's classic baseball novel, The Natural, a couple times. Roy greatly prefers the ending of the movie to that of the book. Which ending do you like better for The Natural?

Scaletta: [Speaking directly into the tape recorder] For the people reading this interview: In the movie Roy Hobbs homers and knocks out the lights in the stadium's scoreboard. In the book he strikes out. Sorry to spoil it for you but that explains the whole conversation.

I think the movie's pretty great. I like the book, too. And they're almost the same, except for the endings. And in the movie, the ending's so huge, that it really makes it. In the movie, you need that ending, and in the book, you need that ending.

SOTC: If you take the baseball books by Malamud and Tunis and Harris, what you end up with is a lot of stories about the game, but also a lot of stories about illness, and loss, and depression. Do you think baseball fosters a sad sort of literature?

Scaletta: I think it's that baseball makes people feel nostalgic. It's got this kind of resonance with American history. But I don't think it was ever an innocent game. There was always cheating, there was always the drunks beating each other up in the stands. We may like to think that there was this simpler time in American history, and if there's a wistfulness about it lately, I think it's just that we associate it with the past, and a time when we like to imagine that America was better.

SOTC: Do baseball and baseball literature go hand-in-hand?

Scaletta: Absolutely. I'm a bigger baseball fan because of the books. I was a reader before I was a baseball fan, I think. It became my favorite sport because of the sort of metaphorical language of baseball. There's all this great slang. This is a 'can of corn,' and these are 'the tools of ignorance.' And that slang resonates throughout American literature.

SOTC: Did you know Mudville would be a children's book from the start?

Scaletta: Yeah. I always liked reading as a kid, and I've always enjoyed children's books. Before I wrote this, I'd decided that it was what I was going to do.

SOTC: Do you think twenty years down the road, when people are writing baseball books for young adults, they'll include the whole steroid mess?

Scaletta: I'm sure there are sports authors that already write about steroid use.

SOTC: Meanwhile, Moundville has its own problems. There's the alcoholic mother, and the jailbird father, the slumping economy, Katrina-

Scaletta: Not Katrina - it was Grand Forks, actually. I lived in Grand Forks for eleven years. And so when I talk about the town being destroyed by a flood, it came from my memories of what happened in Grand Forks. We saw all that footage. Katrina came along after I'd written the fourth draft of this book.

But yeah, you know - I basically thought of it as a humor book the whole time. But I have a guy, the pitcher Sturgis Nye, who's been in a terrible car accident and who's disfigured. And I have alcoholic parents. And a guy in jail. I don't know. I wasn't trying to be downbeat. It just came out that way.

So much of it, though, was around this pitcher, Sturgis, who's incredibly talented but kind of troubled. I thought to make the kid troubled I had to give him a pretty dark past.

SOTC: I like that even after it stops raining, it rains about five more times.

Scaletta: It occurred to me that I had to have it rain again, because it does rain in life. Without it, everything would die. So I was just thinking about it being realistic. But I do like that first time it rains again, when everyone's worried because they don't know if it'll stop.

I have a lot of rain in my writing, anyway. After writing this one, I realized in the other stories I've published, there's always rain in them. I don't know - it must be some sort of personal metaphor or something.

SOTC: Well it seems kind of natural then that you got the idea for the book during a rain delay...  

Scaletta: Yeah. I'd been wanting to write a baseball book. I went through this big phase in the early 2000s where I was reading baseball books all the time and I wanted to write one. Once I went to the library and checked out like twelve baseball books. And so I wanted to write a baseball story, but I didn't know what it would be about. But the whole idea of a town where it's been raining for twenty-two years really is what helped me plan it. I was watching a baseball game, waiting for the rain to stop. And I thought, 'I wonder how long they'll wait?' I wondered what the longest anybody ever waited was, and what if it didn't stop so they could never make it up?

Don't Quit Your Day Job-Job

Dwight Wilmerding, the protagonist of Benjamin Kunkel's 2005 novel Indecision, is acutely aware that other people have trod in his existential shoes. An ambivalent part-time tech support worker, he feels "like a scrap of sociology blown into its designated corner of the world. But knowing the clichés are clichés doesn't help you to escape them. You still have to go on experiencing your experience as if no one else has ever done it."

Sometimes I like to view my own life as a series of progressing archetypes. Just in the last five years, there was what might be called the 'tweed phase,' then the 'On-the-road phase,' and now I'm squarely in the middle of an aspiring-artist-in-a-restaurant phase.' Maybe I enjoy this because viewing life as an archetype is the first step toward viewing life as a narrative, which then leads seamlessly into exploiting one's own life for fictive or ostensibly non-fictive purposes.

Regardless, in this latest incarnation, I work with about a dozen other server-artists - actors, musicians, writers, DJs, a couple divas without a particular craft - some accomplished, some aspiring, many in-between. And while we grumble about our job-job, all of us need it. But not necessarily just to pay rent.

There's the money aspect, for sure. But for a lot of us, it keeps us sane. Last summer I quit the restaurant game just to freelance. About two weeks later I started talking to myself uncontrollably. Like I had inside jokes with only me. Not long after that I pretty much lost any capacity to interact with other humans. This is what happens when you sit in a room with a keyboard for too long, and no internet connection. When I started working for tips again, it was a welcome exit from the world that is my laptop.

So I found solidarity this weekend, like happens sometimes, in an article from the New York Times (thanks Max2 for the link). Caitlin Kelly, a bona fide journalist - and beyond that, an author - writes about her job as a salesperson peddling fru-fru garments in an affluent New York 'burb.

Something had to change. Working alone at home as a freelance writer, which many people dream of, wasn't working for me. The relentless isolation of connecting primarily with others online and by telephone was killing me.

I needed a steady, secure, part-time job, something I could leave behind at day's end, with lots of people contact. I craved a new challenge, a chance to learn and perfect some fresh, useful skills.

She goes on to describe her double-life, a daytime intellectual who moonlights getting bossed around by soccer moms. Pretty existential stuff. I like the message though, which is that artists don't have to be artists all the time - oftentimes it's detrimental to mental health.

Why I'm really writing this blog post: See, Mom? See, Dad?

Saturday mornings we do a wicked brunch. In winter, we get to work at 6:30 am and leave after 4pm, which means we usually don't get to see the sun. The kitchen sends out literally a thousand plates or more, in about a four-hour time period (10-2; the other hours are for side work). Each server ends up watching roughly eighty people go in and out of his or her section, many of these people requesting a medley of drinks because for some reason people really like liquids with their breakfast - coffee, oj, tomato juice, bloody mary, beer chaser, and a round of waters for the table (please). After the shift, the kitchen still a chaotic mess (though unseen to civilians), the Ecuadorian line cooks all hug each other and the bar sends them a shot of tequila. The servers high five and breathe our collective sighs of relief as the last customers leave. We clean the restaurant, roll our silverware, bitch about our tables, count our money and go home to nap before going out before waking up to do it again on Sunday. It's exhausting, but there's camaraderie. Best of all, I get to forget about all my deadlines. Why would I want to give that up?

Facts are for Tight-Assed Suck-Ups

"Oh, people can come up with statistics to prove anything," says Homer Simpson. "14% of people know that."

What Homer's getting at is my long-held belief that facts are overrated. They hinder the imagination, lead to games of trivial one-ups-manship, and they smell bad. I came to this conclusion over a series of internships - Soft Skull Press in Brooklyn, The Rake and The Onion here - all of which consisted of a good amount of fact-checking. Fact-checking sucks. And I'm not good at it. Maybe I don't care enough about details. Maybe because when I make phone calls to verify something I tense up and can't remember what information I'm trying to find out. And then all of a sudden my t-shirt is wet in the underarms. I'm telling you: facts smell bad.

For those who don't know about the practice and for some reason want to, John McPhee's "Checkpoints" in the current New Yorker provides a pretty decent history of fact-checking, what it entails, and why it blows so hard. Quoting from one of the magazine's former checkers:

"Each word in the piece that has even a shred of fact clinging to it is scrutinized, and, if passed, given the checkers imprimatur, which consists of a tiny pencil tick."

Reading that sentence gave me flashbacks to the "So Little Time" section of The Rake, for which one had to verify not just the dates and times of shows, but correct spellings of all the bandmembers' names, the band names, venues, and so on. Also we had to make sure the punctuation was correct - commas inside or outside quotes; words capitalized or lower-case after a colon. I imagine that checking a 150-word blurb about how Weezer was coming to town took about as much time as their actual set on stage. More than a couple times I somehow switched correct information to wrong information, I'm not sure how or why. To my former editors: I'm sorry.

Maybe it's something every writer should do, though, the way that all servers and bartenders agree that everyone should spend three months waiting tables, to know what it's like. Just sayin'.

McPhee's article is interesting not just for it's throwaway jokes - "A-Rod makes an occasional error, and so does The New Yorker"; "When I first worked at Time - in the year 957, during the reign of Eadwig the All-Fair..." - but because it's a glimpse behind-the-scenes, and in this age of reality TV and paparazzi and etc. etc. we all like a little voyeurism.

Magazines, we learn, often have fantastically anal-retentive fact-checking departments, whose members eat crap from authors and poop out legitimate information. Book publishers, on the other hand, usually leave it up to the author. "If material that has appeared in a fact-checked magazine reappears in a book, the author is not the only beneficiary of the checker's work. The book publisher has won a free ticket to factual respectability."  

So let's spend a minute with James Frey. Ready: go! Okay. So now we see why so many memoirs have turned out to be fictional. Which led perhaps to Chris Offut's fantastic definition of Creative Nonfiction: "Prose that is true, except in the case of memoir."

Which leads to Chris Offut's fantastic definition of Memoir: "From the Latin memoria, meaning "memory," a popular form in which the writer remembers entire passages of dialogue from the past, with the ultimate goal of blaming the writer's parents for his current psychological challenges."

(Thanks, Jodi, of MNReads, for the link)

My last mini-anecdote: I work with a guy, Mike, who hates literature. Mike wants to be an English teacher. I'm still trying to figure this out. When the restaurant is slow, we have quiet arguments about whether or not fiction is valid. He refers to novels as 'just some shit that some guy made up.' Technically - if someone were to fact-check that statement - it might not be wrong. But I believe in something like the power of possibility. So I leave all y'all with two quotes:

From Stephen Hawking's A Brief History of Time:

"Each history in the sum over histories will describe not only the space-time, but everything in it as well, including any complicated organisms like human beings who can observe the history of the universe...If all histories are possible, then so long as we exist in one of the histories, we may [be able to] explain why the universe is found to be the way it is. Exactly what meaning can be attached to other histories, in which we do not exist, is not clear."

From Robert Musil's The Man Without Qualities:

"So the sense of possibility could be defined outright as the ability to conceive of everything there might be just as well, and to attach n o more importance to what is than to what is not."

Bladao.

Blogs

Sports

Baseball:
Warning Track Power by Alex Halsted
Sports:
On the Ball by Britt Robson

Society

Weather:
Dude Weather by Jimmy Gaines

A&E

Fiction:
Write Now! by Terry Faust

Retired

Hockey:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Style:
Hook & Eye
Misc:
Is This News?
Fiction:
Yo, Ivanhoe by Brad Zellar
Food:
Consider the Egg by Stephanie March
Wine:
Beyond the Cask
Food:
Food Fight!
Media:
To the Slaughter
Misc:
Outrage by Staff
Food:
Chef's Table
Guest Commentary:
Just Passing Through
Humor:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Cars:
Road Rake by Chris Birt
Commentary:
Read Menace by Tom Bartel
Society:
The Adventures of Melinda by Melinda Jacobs
Politics:
Defenestrator by Rich Goldsmith
Food:
Breaking Bread by Jeremy Iggers & Ann Bauer
Books:
Cracking Spines by Max Ross
Music:
Hear, Hear by Staff
Art:
The Vicious Circle by 6 Critics
Secrets:
Secrets of the Day by Kate Iverson
Theater:
Seen in the City by Staff
Film:
Talk About Talkies by Staff