Dude Weather Subscribe to Secrets Minneapolis / St. Paul

Breaking Bread

A Bone to Pick with Andrew Zimmern

I was going to tell you about my most memorable dining experiences of this past year, but that will have to wait until tomorrow. There is more pressing business at hand: Andrew Zimmern's recent blog post.

I have only met Andrew - who writes about restaurants for Mpls-St.Paul magazine - a couple of times, but he seems like a nice guy. Once, when we happened to be dining at the same restaurant, he sent a couple of glasses of champagne over to our table - a classy gesture. But in a recent blog post, Zimmern says some things about my colleague, Ann Bauer, and me, that kind of hurt my feelings.

I don't mean the part where he says that I have a "workmanlike style honed over many years churning copy at the Star Tribune." I'm not sure how to return that compliment, except to say that Andrew is the perfect restaurant critic for a magazine like Mpls-St. Paul.

No, the part that bothered me is when Andrew wrote that Ann needs to get out more, and that The Rake should send us to the restaurants that are "really making some noise," like La Belle Vie and Heartland, which have both been around for years. And then he suggests that Ann and I need to be "more conversant with the local dining scene."

That's an interesting suggestion, coming from a guy who seems to spend a lot of his time out of town, eating sheep eyeballs on camera. I'm a little curious as to how Andrew finds time to check in on "two dozen other restaurants in town that are kicking ass every meal period." I'm in town most of the time, eating out about five nights a week, - looking for good restaurants that don't make a lot of noise - and I can't name that many places that are that consistently excellent.

He did confess that he still hasn't made it yet to Heidi's, Meritage or Nick & Eddie, but I would be curious to know whether he has made it to very many of other new restaurants that we have written about in the past year: including Saffron (my nominee for the best new restaurant in the Twin Cities), the Blackbird Café, the Chindian Café, Pagoda, Keefer Court, Ngon Vietnamese Bistro, Shiraz, Café BonXai, Mysore, the Hyderabad House, and Vinh Loi. Some of these have been reviewed by Andrew's colleagues, but it looks like Mr. Zimmern himself isn't getting out as much as he should. Or maybe he is spending too much time at the usual suspects. He did make it to Cafe Ena but wasn't impressed - I suggest he give it another try.

I made it to a lot of other very worthwhile restaurants this past year: Peninsula, Brasa, the Grand Café, Cosmos, Relax (the former Yummy), Yum!, Tanpopo Noodle Shop, Obento-ya, Cave Vin, Tam-Tam's African Restaurant, Wolfgang Puck's 20.21, First Course, Little Szechuan, Hoa Bien, Evergreen, Vincent, the Colossal Café, North Coast, Kum Gang San, Victor's 1959 Café, Sapor, Babalu , Cheng Heng and the Namaste Café - and I am sure I am forgetting a few.

I don't spend a lot of time going back to places like La Belle Vie and Heartland, because they have been around for years. And besides, I have had some wonderful meals at La Belle Vie, but I have also had moments where I have found myself wondering just exactly what the point is. Tim McKee and Josh Thoma are very talented chefs, but their menu, with its truffles and porcini and Barkham blue and branzino (sea bass, flown in fresh from the Mediterranean), doesn't exactly engage the place where they are. It's a cuisine they could create anywhere, as long as their customers have enough money - but maybe that is the point.

I'm more inclined to restaurants like Heartland, at least in theory. I like and admire Lenny Russo, who is a very engaging guy, and has done heroic work to support local farmers and promote local and sustainable eating. His menus always sound wonderful - how can you resist a dish like Minnesota elk tartare with preserved tomato jam, Wisconsin turnip slaw and rosemary-shallot dressing? In my limited experience, it's always good, but it doesn't always taste as exquisite as it sounds. Maybe it's time for another visit, but I wish he used more garlic. Or something.

Zen philosopher Alan Watts warned against eating the menu instead of the meal. That's good advice. Charlie the Tuna had something similar in mind when he made the distinction between "good taste" and "tastes good." Lucky for us, our readers just want to know what tastes good.

Tomorrow: my favorite tastes and restaurants of 2007. I promise.

 

 

 

 

11 Reader Comments

m0rt (not verified)08:59pm
Jan 1
OKOKOKOK, I've had enough of this food fight. Can you all go to an Old Country Buffet and settle things, puh-leez?
Anonymous (not verified)07:44am
Jan 4
ok....you guys take yourselves way too seriously....nobody really cares about who's looking for a job where, etc. etc. ....maybe you should all do best 100 of the year to keep yourselves busy writing about food, not each other
Anonymous (not verified)09:13am
Jan 2
I believe restaurant reviews should help developing food artists within the community and within the larger world community. You may interpret this a number of ways. I heard you both speak. A whole extended family and community is involved in the staging of a meal. I believe you are sensitive to that process. I liked Bauer's column about pancake art at Hell's Kitchen. Everyday unsung heores create healthy communities.Lace work of social connections which can be affirmed in restaurant reviewing, education the public on the nuances of farm culture,kitchen communication, stress of preparation, display, presentation, serving etc. Layers of social contacts, respect and small kindnesses, rather than sarcasm and mean-spirited comments for laughs (I worked at donut shops and elegant cafes in college, it is hard work)
Adam Platt (not verified)10:52am
Jan 2
I'd just note that Mr. Iggers came by our offices post-Star Tribune buyout looking to affiliate with "a magazine like Mpls.St.Paul" before he signed on with The Rake. I guess he would have been the perfect critic for a magazine like Mpls.St.Paul as well. That fact duly noted, why can't we just all like the restaurants we like? Why so much snobbery? Why so much contempt? Why so much self-importance? We all have different taste buds. Every restaurant has good and bad nights. It ain't rocket science, it's food. And more than any other topic that attracts critics, excellence is in the eye of the beholder. Now that everyone's had their rant, can we get back to what's on the plate? --Adam Platt, restaurants editor Mpls.St.Paul Magazine
Clepro (not verified)09:51am
Jan 10
Whoa! Tacky. Your urging to get back to what's on the place would have had more validity if you'd resisted prefacing it with a petty dig.
Tacy (not verified)12:31am
Jan 13
"Why so much snobbery? Why so much contempt? Why so much self-importance?" As an outside observer, I think that Iggers was rightfully responding to snide comments that Zimmern made in his blog. It seems to me that Adam Platt's questions about excessive snobbery and self-importance should be directed at Zimmern. As I've posted elsewhere, most restaurant critics try to maintain their anonymity in order to avoid special treatment at restaurants they're reviewing. Zimmern lost his credibility as a food critic a long ago when he failed to follow this tradition.
gary johnson (not verified)01:22pm
Jan 2
Jeremy, Alan Watts also made some comments about the wisdom of insecurity, but I don't think he was referring to the kind displayed in your blog. When you criticize Andrew for not getting to every restaurant, you're correct and that's why we have three other terrific food writers, Adam Platt (editor), Beth Dooley and Peter Lilienthal. Between the four of them I think we cover the waterfront pretty damn well. They even go to restaurants that have never advertised in our magazine contrary to your BS about our methods. We have only our reader in mind. That's why over 70,000 of them pay to read us every month. Ain't no other mag in town can say that, including your free rag. See you on the street. Gary Johnson, President MSP Communications
Jeremy Iggers03:39pm
Jan 2
Hi Gary, Hi Adam, Its nice to know that we have readers over at MSP. I do want to set the record straight on a couple of points, though: 1) I never said anything about your methods of selling advertising. 2) The proposal we made was for MSP Communications to sell ads for a free-standing website. You guys are really good at that. The idea of being a critic for your magazine frankly didn't have much appeal to me. Best, Jeremy
wine spectator (not verified)10:20am
Jan 3
Ding Ding...Food fight! Now this is good reading. Food slinging by the food critics. Critics are a dying breed of sorts anyhow. With all the foodie blogs and whatnot, anybody with an internet connection can badmouth or sing praises of any restaurant on any day of the week. Who cares? Chefs and restaurantuers lay everything on the line, investing thier lifes work, thier hard earned money, hundreds of thousands or more likely, millions of dollars toward a dream of opening a restaurant. Only to have thier hopes and dreams washed away with a few mighty key strokes of careless individuals. We just want to get people in our door. We open our doors and put it all out there everyday with hope of getting people in the door, once they are in, it is our mission to make them feel valued, feel happy, and well taken care of with the hope they will return again and again. This is what we live for, happy guests. I commend anybody looking to do a "best of" recap of restaurants old, new, most popular, least popular, whatever. Because its good for the restaurant community and nobody gets hurt...except the critics apparently.
Jimmy (not verified)11:22am
Jan 7
A favorite aphorism applies, I think, quite nicely to Mr. Zimmern's oily venom: "Hollow things make a lote of noise." Perhaps the hairless ovate gentleman is feeling empty from years away a real gas range, a buzzing kitchen ticket rail, and his ass on a plate in front of diners (and eaters). Fear does weird things to people. Or, maybe his Rachel Ray-like, eye-rolling "Mmmmm!" after every morsel of wildebeest-fat-poached dung beetle is actually genuine - perhaps he's drunk the kool-aid and actually believes in his own effluvia. In that case, there may be no hope. We'll all just have to pray for him as we eat at the various devoted temples of wonderful food right here in flyover country: Alma, 112, LBV, Ngon, Little Szechuan, Fugaise, Tampopo, Heartland, Confluence, etc...
Anonymous (not verified)02:01am
Apr 2
Why does he always have to eat and talk with his mouth open and make this loud smacking sound? The food that he ate are bizarre but the way he eats is rude and annoying

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <i> <b> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
By entering in the words in the captcha image, you help us prevent automated spam submissions and keep the site tidy.

Blogs

Sports

Baseball:
Warning Track Power by Alex Halsted
Sports:
On the Ball by Britt Robson

Society

Weather:
Dude Weather by Jimmy Gaines

A&E

Fiction:
Write Now! by Terry Faust

Retired

Hockey:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Style:
Hook & Eye
Misc:
Is This News?
Fiction:
Yo, Ivanhoe by Brad Zellar
Food:
Consider the Egg by Stephanie March
Wine:
Beyond the Cask
Food:
Food Fight!
Media:
To the Slaughter
Misc:
Outrage by Staff
Food:
Chef's Table
Guest Commentary:
Just Passing Through
Humor:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Cars:
Road Rake by Chris Birt
Commentary:
Read Menace by Tom Bartel
Society:
The Adventures of Melinda by Melinda Jacobs
Politics:
Defenestrator by Rich Goldsmith
Food:
Breaking Bread by Jeremy Iggers & Ann Bauer
Books:
Cracking Spines by Max Ross
Music:
Hear, Hear by Staff
Art:
The Vicious Circle by 6 Critics
Secrets:
Secrets of the Day by Kate Iverson
Theater:
Seen in the City by Staff
Film:
Talk About Talkies by Staff