Dude Weather Subscribe to Secrets Minneapolis / St. Paul
Photo copyright 2009 NBAE (Photo by Scott Cunningham/NBAE via Getty Images)
Folks--
My apologies for the lengthy absence. I want to keep my hand in regarding NBA stuff and--if and when the Wolves ever hire a new GM-- the home team. But I am fortunately very busy with paying work and now that this is a voluntary endeavor (until I figure out my next move) posting here keeps getting moved to the back of the line. But now that the second round of the West is merely hours away, it's time to, literally, put up or shut up. And I regard these two second-round series as too exciting for me not to weigh in.
First, a quick recap of round one. On the basis of wins and losses, I've only missed my prediction on one of the series thus far, pending today's Miami-Atlanta finale, but it's one thing to predict the call, another to fathom the flavor of what will ensue. For example, I absolutely nailed the Orlando-Philly series--it's like I saw the six games ahead of time--but totally underestimated how much trouble the Celts were in versus Chicago. Ironic, as a longtime KG booster, that I didn't give more credence to his absence. Tell me folks, doesn't the Paul Pierce of the Bulls series look awfully familiar, like the pre-KG Pierce who was a very good, occasionally great player who didn't defend all that well? For that matter, remember how claustrophobic Boston could make an opponent in the half-court with there pressuring rotations? Now we realize the Celts could sell out on tight coverage because Garnett was around to deter mistakes at all four corners of the paint. Name me one Celtic who distinguished himself via his defense versus Chicago, and then recall what kind of D was played in last year's championship march. The idea that KG isn't first among equals in that Big 3 is now revealed to be a joke.
The calls of the Cavs in 4 and the Lakers in 5 were accurate and conventional. I also hit the game count in the Orlando-Philly and Houston-Portland series--not too shabby. And I called the winner and was off only a game on Denver-New Orleans.
But now for the comeuppance. Along with misreading Chicago-Boston, I overrated the maturity of the Atlanta Hawks--meaning I thought they wouldn't act like clueless, undisciplined jerks. No NBA team in these playoffs gets less out of its core talent than Atlanta and for that you have to blame Mike Bibby, the supposed floor general, and Josh Smith, the emotional train wreck. It wasn't just the ill-timed, stupid dunk-attempt shenanigans, but the wretched shot selection, indifferent defense, and sporadic effort demonstrated by Smith that was so aggravating. I honestly hope the Hawks lose this afternoon, although I don't expect it. No matter: Smith and company will get their just desserts in the Cleveland series.
Then there was the totally blown call of the San Antonio-Dallas matchup. I don't have much to add to the prevailing commentary that the Spurs simply are too old and too thin to survive when one of their big three is out and another is hobbled. It was shocking how little Popovich felt he could rely on anyone but Parker and Duncan--Roger Mason and Drew Gooden were among the disappeared. (Check out Bill Simmons' column of last week for his very incisive comments disparaging Gooden's game as a fit for San Antonio. Scola will haunt the franchise for at least another 3 years.) But as we all perform the autopsy on the Spurs, the Mavs are getting short shrift for superbly played series, especially from erstwhile doghouse denizens like Josh Howard and Erick Dampier, who set the tone defensively and played like their vintage selves from three years ago. Which brings us to the second round and a pair of beguiling matchups in the West.
Dallas Mavericks vs. Denver Nuggets
Both ballclubs are peaking at the perfect time, both have rosters containing playoff-tested veterans with something to prove, both sport scorers capable of getting 50 or 60 if on a roll and both began the season having no business imaging they'd get this far. Looking at the matchups, this is going to be a beaut, beginning with Josh Howard on Melo Anthony and Jason Kidd on Chauncey Billups. If those two Mavs can disrupt the twin engines of Denver's offense enough to force chuckleheads like JR Smith and Birdman Anderson--both incredible talents with ten-cent heads--into crucial roles, Dallas has a great chance of springing the upset.
At the other end, there is the rugged K-Mart on a Dirk Nowitzski who gets rattled by physicality. What the refs do and don't allow will be vital to the tone and tenor of play, and if they keep their whistles quiet on the borderline calls when Dirk drives, then Jet Terry is going to have to have an amazing series for the Mavs to triumph. The Terry-Dahnty Jones matchup is another compelling lockdown that I expect Terry to surmount. And in the middle you've got the rejuvenated Dampier against the emerging Nene--a tussle that could go either way.
I see Denver's depth eventually making the difference. If George Karl has any sense, Anthony Carter will always be around to negate the energy Barea brings off the bench, and the Birdman will force Brandon Bass a little further out on his midrange. Denver's second unit can be feast or famine, but they're a force to be recknoned with going into every game and Dallas really only likes to go 7 deep (8th man Antoine Wright averaged 13 minutes versus San Antonio). But if Kidd and Howard find ways to stymie Billups and Melo and Dirk gets K-Mart and Nene in foul trouble, Dallas springs the upset. But those things won't happen often enough.
Denver is 6 or 7
Los Angeles Lakers vs. Houston Rockets
I really like the way Houston is playing since jettisoning McGrady and Alston: They exposed Portland's no-paint offense and moved the ball faster than the Blazers could cover at the other end of the court. With every game I've seen San Antonio and Houston play, I'm stunned that the Spurs would ever part with Luis Scola, who is a San Antonio prototype and a tremendous grinder. The face of the Houston franchise is Yao but the ballclub's identity lies with the sweat-equity trio of Scola, Battier and Artest. Throw in underrated coach Rick Adelman and the squirrelly duo of Brooks and Lowry and the Rockets have become one of my favorite teams this year--I'm even softening up on Yao.
Houston would be a serious threat to upset the Lakers if Ron-Ron could regulate his shot-shots, but unfortunately I don't think that's going to happen. There is no rhyme or reason for when Artest will jack up a trey with his team up a dozen in the third quarter and there's 15 seconds on the clock, or when he'll take it to the hole and earn the whistle and promote the ball movement that Scola and Battier (and Yao and Brooks) engender. The Rockets survived the shot-happy Artest because Portland didn't have a low post threat to expose (and tire) Yao. But the Lakers obviously do.
Artest also made a mistake claiming Brandon Roy was his toughest matchup as a defender. There's a superstar in L.A. probably receptive to being baited into a quiet fury over such things. Houston is one of the rare NBA teams that have decent matchups for the Lakers' uber-talented roster, but providing extra incentive for Kobe is classic Artest stupidity. Don't be surprised if Artest has a horrible shooting percentage when this series is over--Kobe will hound him on the perimeter and Bynum, Gasol and company have the length and smarts to deter his snail-like penetration to the hoop. That means Yao will have to get Bynum in foul trouble (entirely possible) and team with Scola in preventing Gasol from scoring inside (very unlikely). It means Houston will have to win the point guard matchup with their kids and that the confidence of Von Wafer must continue to flourish on the big stage of the postseason. Houston's bench was key in its wins over Portland, especially the go-go trio of Wafer, Lowry and the vastly underrated Carl Landry, a tremendous glue guy who, with Chuck Hayes, gives Houston great depth down low in the frontcourt.
The reality check is looking at the Lakers' roster. This ballclub is incredibly flexible. One of the more intriguing matchups is Battier versus Trevor Ariza, both of them defensive specialists smart enough to roam without getting burned too often, and smart enough to burn opponents who roam on them. If Yao can get the Lakers sagging and Ariza doesn't stay home, Battier has a knack for burying the key trey. But if Bynum holds his own against Yao, that puts Scola on Gasol and forces Battier on to Odom on occasion--a much different framework all the way around. Or Phil Jackson can plug in Luke Walton for Ariza, or throw Kobe at the three with Vujacic at the off guard. There are scenarios where the Lakers can run Houston right off the court, or at the very least wear their bangers and Yao down enough that they lack the quickness to defend in the half-court. And then there's Kobe, ready to remind Artest that Brandon Roy is a picnic compared to the Black Mamba.
Los Angeles in 6.
Over in the East, the series aren't nearly as compelling. I'm not going to bother breaking down Atlanta/Miami and Cleveland. How motivated or overconfident are the Cavs? That's all we really need to know to decide whether this thing is over in 4, 5 or 6 games. Neither the Hawks nor the Heat can seriously compete here. What the hell, in tribute to LeBron, let's say...
Cleveland in 4
Orlando Magic vs. Boston Celtics
Neither team distinguished itself in the first round. Yes, the Celts-Bulls series was one for the ages, but only for the total parity of the opponents and their respective ability to drain big shots with the clock winding down--and, concurrently, the inability of defenses to stop them. Quite obviously, if KG is still out, Boston has no real answer for Dwight Howard. Kendrick Perkins will be in second quarter foul trouble a majority of the games, and that Big Baby nickname of Glen Davis's will have particilar resonance as Howard asserts himself down low.
On the other hand, can Orlando defend anybody out on the perimeter? The absence of Courtney Lee puts even more of an onus on Mickael Pietrus to play tough D, because you know we won't see it from Hedo or Rashard, and Rafer Alston is going to have his own can of whup-ass handed to him by Rondo. Then there is that ethereal "team chemistry" thing: Whatever one thinks of Boston's shortcomings, they hang tough together. The vibe out of Orlando is always about whether Howard is mean enough, or whether the players respect coach Stan Van Gundy, or the health of the bookend forwards Turkoglu and Lewis.
The Magic "should" win this series. The Celts have no real matchup for the game's most dominant big man, Boston is (or should be) exhausted from its marathon with the Bulls, provoking enormous minutes from aging vets Pierce and Ray Allen, and, as mentioned, Boston's once-vaunted defense lacks the glue of KG's passion and quickness. If Orlando gets its inside-outside offense in rhythm, they will score plenty. Of course the Celtics are going to score plenty too. Whichever one of the bookend forwards guards Baby Davis is due to get roasted, provided he gets enough touches after Allen and/or Pierce feast on the Magic's specious perimeter coverage.
I have no firm take here. I can make plausible scenarios for Orlando and Boston, in five games or seven. I'm going to say Boston has enough pride and intensity left to outlast a Magic squad that has a perplexing lassitude. Either way, its just a competition for sacrificial lamb status in the Eastern Conference Finals.
Boston in 7.
Thanks for checking in, Britt. Hopefully, the Wolves will pick a solid gm and we can get the ball rolling.
Whoever wins the Heat-Hawks match-up, they won't be around long.
Enjoy the Spring turn Summer.
It is amazing how below average the Celtics defense is without Garnett. As Doug Collins was saying on Saturday night, the Celtics just could not stop the Bulls from scoring.
On a wolves note: it's shocking (see Twolves blog) that the wolves offered McHale a 3 year coaching contract last December. What were they thinking? Who made this decision to make this offer? Was it Hoiberg? Was it Taylor alone? Awful.
Passing over the fawning "love this great wonderful exciting game" fluff, you almost had me convinced on the Rockets Lakers series, but the Nuggets are the only team other than the Cavs able to both score and defend enough at the same time to make a series interesting with the Lakers.
2nd round all looks like 5 and done. That would at least make for an interesting stat oddity. So...
Britt,
I agree that Garnett has been the best player on the Celts since his arrival, but these playoffs aren't really doing anything to prove that point. If it were Allen or Pierce, instead of KG, that missed Round 1, I think it's still a very good series (with Boston winning it). KG and all TWolves fans understand how tough it is to win a playoff series, so the fact that Boston just did that, and KG's only contribution was embarrassing himself on the sidelines, doesn't do much to boost his perceived stock on that team. Again, I agree he's a more valuable player than any other Celtic, provided he has two good legs to stand on, but I wouldn't point to this series as good evidence of that. Just like Pierce's defense was exposed in KG's absence, KG's lack-of-killer-instinct would've been exposed in 4th Quarters if PP was out, instead. That's just an incredible team when all the stars are healthy...take away one of them, and they're just very good.
Andy G,
Are you serious? Tell me Miller, Noah or Thomas score more than single digits in a single game of that series with a healthy KG on the floor. The defensive and rebounding drop off was enormous every time Perkins left the floor. Why? No KG. How much tighter could the C's perimeter players have guarded Gordon and Rose knowing KG was behind them. To say nothing of KG's impeccable help D...
I am not sure if that series would go to five games with KG on the floor. Maybe 5 if you took away Allen or Pierce.
Wow, that Bulls-Celts matchup is the reason I follow basketball. Has Brad Miller gone back to being underrated (or maybe closer to "overlooked") as a player? I've always liked the guy for his hard-nosed play - and yes, I still think he'd have been a good fit for our Wolves.
I think an overlooked matchup of Houston-LA is the PG situation. Deron Williams can roast Fisher, but is Aaron Brooks aggressive enough to try as well? His matchup (and Yao's) are the most advantageous to Houston, so if Houston wants to stay in it, those two will have to step up. I'm most excited for this series, though I'd rather it was Portland-LA, honestly.
Also, I don't think the Cavs are invincible - yes, the Hawks play selfish hoops sometimes, but they do have the personnel to be a dynamic team, unlike the Magic or Cavs, who are built around superstars and whose role players are largely one-dimensional. Of course, Bibby's arrival has really been the catalyst for the Hawks playoff pushes, so how he reacts to Mo Williams (the Cavs only other dynamic player) will be important.
Mavs-Nuggets seems like a great matchup on paper, but why am I so disinterested in that series? I don't really enjoy watching either of those teams, though I can tolerate the Nuggets a bit more now that they've got Chauncey. The Birdman and JR might be the most likable characters in this entire series - do I really need 30 minutes of Dahntay Jones and Antoine Wright?
Bulls-Celtics was great. (Just as great: TNT sticking Harlan and Collins there for the whole series instead of rotating different guys in there.) After that, I'm convinced more than ever that Joakim Noah was the correct pick for the Wolves two years ago. Brewer could still work out as a player, but Jefferson and Love's biggest weaknesses are in guarding on the perimeter, and Noah more than holds his own in that area. Guys like him, Varejao, and Birdman Anderson are very valuable now.
I think the Hawks' athleticism gets them one game at home. If they get Marvin Williams back, they might get enough scoring to win another one there. I think Orlando beats the Celtics in 6 if they don't take them lightly, mainly because Boston's D will have some problems with that frontline. Lakers in 6 because of Houston's defense and the likelihood of one breakout game from Artest, one from Yao, one from Brooks, one from Scola, and one from another role player (Landry, Hayes, Battier, Wafer) should lead to two wins. Nuggets in 5 because of their athletic advantage in the frontcourt.
As for KG, I agree with Britt. The Celtics' identity is their lockdown defense and their intensity on that end of the floor. If they'd had KG instead of Pierce, they'd have won in 6 because their D would've won them at least one game. Instead, they had to continuously rely on scoring to stay in the game.
I'm looking for the Celtics to hand a beating to the Magic and the Lakers to demolish the Rockets.
Agree?
Last year, with KG, Boston escaped their first round series in seven games. This year, without him, they had the same result, against a better team.
I agree that he was their best player before his injury. But, winning a playoff series without him playing a single minute is hardly the time to bring that up. That's all.
Boston-Chicago was a series for the ages no doubt. Game 7 was actually a bit disappointing given how high the bar had been set in the series. As fun as that series has been, I think Boston's next round is going to be painful. Perkins shoulder injury late in the game against Chicago is going to resurface and without Perkins at 100%, Boston just doesn't have anybody to challenge Howard, who I think will go ballistic. I think Boston is good enough for two wins and that's it.
Atlanta is good for one game but other than that Cleveland will just kill them.
The Lakers will take Houston apart. I don't even think it will be close. LA is just way too good, too deep, and too versatile. It certainly did not help their cause when Artest opened his mouth. Kobe is going to go crazy.
Andy G, I disagree.
Yes, it's true that Celtics with KG went 7 games with Atlanta in the first round and Celtics without KG went 7 games in 1st round against Bulls.
But those two series could not be more different. Boston absolutely destroyed Atlanta. Only one of the four boston victories in that series was by less than 20 points, and that one was by 19 points.
they held Atlanta to 81, 77, 85, and 65 points in their four victories. Dominating, suffocating defense. All KG, baby.
Are this year's bulls really that much better than last year's Hawks? I think not.
I'm mostly in agreement with Britt, PSR, and Nate, since I think KG is the best player on the Celtics. But, any team that advances in the playoffs is a very good team. Boston, without KG, has proven itself to be in that category. If they somehow beat Orlando (which I highly doubt will happen) they enter the Final 4 of teams, which borders on the "great" caliber. To say that Garnett's value to the team is somehow clearer as his team marches on without him doesn't make sense to me. I watched 6 of the 7 games in the Chicago series, and I saw how close Boston was to winning it in 5 games or less. Chicago--moreso than Boston--was the team escaping with close wins when it looked like they were hopeless. Yes, their defense is considerably worse. But their offense is about the same and maybe even a little better, if that Rondo to Allen action stays hot. I just don't think there was anything particularly enlightening in that series with respect to Boston's players, except that Rondo had a breakout series and Ray Allen reminded people just how damn great he is at jumpshooting.
Andy G--
Thanks for stirring the pot. It is probably a ridiculous claim, but I think the Celts either sweep Chicago or beat them in 5 with KG on the floor. Yes, the Bulls and last year's Hawks were comparable talents, but the 07-08 Hawks presented the KG-Celts with many more matchup problems, and in the postseason matchups are the name of the game.
Question: Who were the emerging "surprises" on Bulls during this series? I would say, Noah and Brad Miller, in that order. Now imagine how they would have performed with a healthy Garnett on the floor. Also, remember how well the Celts rotated last year and at the beginning of this year. As I wrote in the above post, the strength and commitment of those defensive rotations were due to KG being the failsafe defender in the paint.
With KG in the lineup, Paul Pierce, who defended LeBron and Kobe pretty well in back-to-back series last year, doesn't get undressed in two games by John Salmons. The defensively challenged (and that's putting it mildly) Glen Davis sees much less action. The Rondo-to-Allen connection you spoke of doesn't change--remember, the "knock" on KG is that he doesn't want the ball at crunchtime.
The last point is infectious passion. Yeah, KG was a flagrant jerk getting in Gordon's face and ripping at Miller's missed FTs. But in uniform, that emotion gets channeled into challenging his teammates, and himself. I saw the Celts look pretty damn spunky on offense. But how many chest-bumps and high 5's did you see for blocked shots and charges taken and 24-second violations in this series?
You say now is not the time to bring up the impact of Garnett because the Celtics advanced, and that's all that matters. As one of the few people who think Boston has enough to get past Orlando and then get whupped by the Cavs, I've got to tell you that I think Boston will finish in the exact same spot they would if Garnett were playing. But to say he therefore doesn't make a difference is absurd and you know it.
To prove it, I'll flip that logic back at you: What does it matter that Jefferson and Brewer were injured this season and Wittman coached the first quarter of the season: The Wolves weren't going to make the playoffs anyway. In fact Minnesota finished with a better record without Jefferson for an entire season this year than they did when they had Jefferson all year last season, so I guess I won't be hearing any comments from you about Jefferson's benefit to the franchise.
Good points Britt, and I tried to qualify my argument by repeating that Garnett is the best player on that team. Clearly, our disagreement lies in how big the difference is between his importance and Pierce's and Allen's.
I don't think it is all-that-big. If you take out Allen, well, you've got the Boston Celtics of the first two rounds of the 07-08 Playoffs, when he disappeared. That's a team that's barely better than the Hawks and BARELY better than the Mo Williams-less Cavs. In other words, a team that sounds a lot like the KG-less Celts, this year. If you take out Pierce, I would guess that a similar effect happens to the offense, especially in crunchtime and by not having his ability to draw fouls and stick clutch j's, they lose to good opponents in close games.
I appreciate what Garnett would do to Noah, Miller & Co., but I also doubt that he would have any effect whatsoever on Ben Gordon, considering he was hitting shots that nobody on Earth could stop, at different points in that series. If he's doing that, and you don't have Allen or Pierce to counter on the other end, you're losing that game. I think that the fact that Boston won that series, even if it took the full seven, was impressive and a testament to the guys that KG plays with. Remember that Leon Powe was also out, so they were especially thin down low and needed a helluva series from their 1-2-3 positions.
Andy G--
You defend yourself well, and, as we both concede, we're not that far apart.
Maybe the real missing of KG happens with Orlando: As I write the Celts are getting absolutely waxed.
Not to draw attention from "KG and the big two" (couldn't resist), but we should keep in mind that injury and personnel changes have made a major impact on the Celts this year. KG's absence merely exposes that the Celts never bothered to replace Posey and PJ Brown (and instead relied upon Davis and Powe). KG makes those guys seem like passable pros - though I will give the Celts' frontline credit for their performance in the Bulls series. I'm not sure Boston is deep enough to last, whereas a team like Orlando has a much better bench (I'm looking for a big series from Pietrus in particular).
The Hawks-Bulls comparison almost works, except the Hawks were better coached and knew their roles a bit better than the Bulls did. I think the Hawks frontcourt size would have been a big factor without KG, obviously.
Yes, it looks like Dwight is going to have a field day without Garnett down there to grab some rebounds and block some shots. If Hedo decides that jacking threes with 19 on the shot clock is their best offense, however, it looks like it could still be a good series.
LAL sure looked overmatched, last night. Battier has proven himself to be a Kobe-container, if not Kobe-stopper, but that didn't stop #24 from shooting about 10 too many times. And Fisher clearly cannot stay in front of Brooks, as Barkley pointed out after the game. Crazy as this sounds, I think Shannon Brown needs to see a lot more action, since his athleticism and toughness will be needed in this series, and he looks to get out in transition more than Farmar and Fish--a style of play that Houston does not want to get into. After one game, though, this looks a lot like the Adelman-Jackson matchup that went 7 games back in 2002.
Why teams don't go hard at Yao in the post, especially an opponent who has Gasol, Bynum, Odom, etc., is a great mystery to me. I think Houston matches up well with LA, for some of the reasons that were apparent last night, but called the series for the Lakers due to three factors: Yao's defense, Artest's shot selection and Kobe's crunchtime killer instinct.
But I do think that having the ability to put Battier or Artest on Kobe is a huge advantage. How many teams have not one but two guys who will make Kobe work to get his points?
Houston is grossly underrated right now, and the Lakers were overconfident. Their opening game win makes this a potentially great series. As an unabashed fan of how hard and how coordinated they work, I'm really looking forward to the remaining games, however it goes down.
Re: the Hawks vs. Bulls comparison.
I don't believe anyone has pointed out the major factor in the Hawks series...the Celtics played like crap. Ray Allen couldn't hit the broad side of a barn and the rest of the team played tentative and scared...they were getting their playoff sea legs underneath them as a newly constructed team with enormous pressure to perform.
Here's the comparison...Celtics with KG beat the Hawks in seven games, with four lopside victories and three close losses despite themselves. Celtics without KG beat the Bulls in seven, with 5 1/2 very close games by playing very well. In the former, they were upset with themselves for letting the Hawks take it so far, in the latter they were grateful to get out alive.
The fact that both went to seven is meaningless and does nothing to diminish KG's value. The two series couldn't have been more different.
Houston is definitely the model for how to set up three-point shooters around a low-block scorer.
It seems like they are dedicated to getting back on defense, as opposed to crashing the glass. I think it's fair to assume that they will lose the games that they don't shoot well from outside--the question is whether that number of games will be 3 or less.
I think it'll be important for LA to get out and run as much as possible in the first half of games. That way, they can play with a lead and force Houston out of their comfort zone a bit more. Last night, Houston controlled the entire game, except for the short stint when Yao got injured and the tempo picked up.
Most of the game looked like last year's Finals, with a lot of Lakers standing around and watching Kobe. I'd put a bit more blame on him, this time, since he shot so much and the others didn't get a good chance to find their rhythm.
TrueHoop had a good post about the Rockets' defensive philosophy against the Lakers that gave some insight into their reliance on stats. I'm not saying they'll pull the upset in the series, but if they did, how much would that elevate the perception of advanced stats? They don't give a full picture, but if they provide enough of one to make what seemed like a certain Laker victory into even a 7-game tilt, I think more people would start to take notice of them.
1) Yes, KG is the man in Boston. But, I think if Pierce went down it would be just as difficult for Boston to win games. Allen I think is the 3rd wheel that would be easier to live without.
2) What we really want to know is what the heck are the Wolves doing? Everything so far sounds like Taylor wants to go on the cheap. Lindsey turned them down because he would not have enough say in what happens.
End result will be the pick everyone suspected all along, Stack or Hoiberg. Who will be willing to go with Taylor's plans.
Rob
Wow, the Lakers-Rockets series just got intense. I wondered how long Artest could wait to get involved in some of the extra-curricular activities going on in the series--I guess his wait his over, and everybody will be watching to see him and Kobe interact in Game 3. Fisher will get suspended--he really jacked up Scola and even if he's a nice guy, he'll miss a game for that one.
I don't feel good about the Lakers chances in this series or the rest of the playoffs, if the game slows down too much. I don't like their half-court offense when Kobe has to take those impossible jumpers all the time. There is no way he's going to make that percentage in 4 out of 7 games when 90% of them are fadeaways with a hand in his face. They either need to create a lot more Gasol opportunities, or do something to get Kobe closer to the basket. Last year's Finals should've shown them that the days of isolating him at the top and having everything work itself out are over.
Loved the post-game show, last night, where they listed the Rockets' "pitbulls". The team that makes it out of this series is not going to be fun to deal with in the later rounds. This is Finals-like intensity and it's fun to watch.
Umm, guys. Rondo was percentage points away from averaging a triple double in round one. He made far more of an impact winning those ballgames than either Pierce or Ray. Especially Pierce.
That duo definitely hit some huge shots, but Boston might have been crushed without Rondo in that series.
Rondo is the type of player that won't kill you if he has an off night shooting. He brings solid defense and an innate ability to find teammates (even the scrubs). Not to mention that he's the best rebounding point guard in the NBA. He also rarely turns the ball over (with the exception of game 1 of the Orlando series).
KG's dramatic, game-changing effect on games is surely missed. And will continue to be. And he is by far the most important piece needed for Boston to repeat. But if the Celtics continue to advance, it will be because of the continued emergence of Rondo, not the late game heroics of Ray and Pierce.
Two games deep and Rondo is averaging another triple double in round two. A lightening fast Jason Kidd is emerging people.
I just now got a chance to read Britt again and all the other comments. Congratulations Britt on hitting the Cavs series square on. I do not think they will sweep the next series whoever it is. They will lose once.
The biggest disappointment is the LA/HOU series. IT looked like a good series until Yao went down, then I thought IT IS OVER. Then HOU spanks the Fakers when they had every reason to quit. Yes the Fakers came back and stomped HOU the next game and will win the series in 6, but it should have been five. I don't see LA beating CLE for the championship. Heck, they might not even make it past Denver. Aren't the Nuggets playing VERY well. I think this is what they thought AI would bring when they traded for him.
My predictions for the rest of the "tourney" LA over DEN in 7 and CLE over BOS in 5. CLE over LA in 6. I'm also looking for this to be the start of a dynasty in CLE. . . just sayin'
How much tighter could the C's perimeter players have guarded Gordon and Rose knowing KG was behind them. To say nothing of KG's impeccable help D...
Custom Dissertation | Thesis Service
I don't like their half-court offense when Kobe has to take those impossible jumpers all the time.
Coursework Writing
I wonder if these games will be (or are) available for downloading? Wanted to download from http://www.picktorrent.com search engine but didn't find. Would like to watch taking into account every detail and your article.
Baseball:
Warning Track Power by Alex Halsted
Sports:
On the Ball by Britt Robson
Weather:
Dude Weather by Jimmy Gaines
Fiction:
Write Now! by Terry Faust
Hockey:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Style:
Hook & Eye
Misc:
Is This News?
Fiction:
Yo, Ivanhoe by Brad Zellar
Food:
Consider the Egg by Stephanie March
Wine:
Beyond the Cask
Food:
Food Fight!
Media:
To the Slaughter
Misc:
Outrage by Staff
Food:
Chef's Table
Guest Commentary:
Just Passing Through
Humor:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Cars:
Road Rake by Chris Birt
Commentary:
Read Menace by Tom Bartel
Society:
The Adventures of Melinda by Melinda Jacobs
Politics:
Defenestrator by Rich Goldsmith
Food:
Breaking Bread by Jeremy Iggers & Ann Bauer
Books:
Cracking Spines by Max Ross
Music:
Hear, Hear by Staff
Art:
The Vicious Circle by 6 Critics
Secrets:
Secrets of the Day by Kate Iverson
Theater:
Seen in the City by Staff
Film:
Talk About Talkies by Staff