Dude Weather Subscribe to Secrets Minneapolis / St. Paul
Game #54, Home Game #27: Minnesota 105, Indiana 112
Game #55, Home Game #28: Minnesota 108, LA Lakers 111
Season Record: 18-37
1. The Closing Circle
There are those who checked out after Jefferson went down, and perhaps they are the smart ones. The Wolves have dropped four out of five since then against relatively mediocre competition and figure to chug in somewhere between last year's 22 wins and three or four more as a sign of "progress." The fair-weather fans may have stuck their heads out for a glimpse in January, but in the long run, and especially since Big Al heard that "pop," this season has become like every other one not coached by Flip Saunders--with a dwindling fan base in it as much for the glory and satisfactions of the game as for the team.
On those terms, then, Minnesota's loss to Indiana was absolutely dreadful, and tonight's nip-and-tuck defeat to the conference champs from the left coast a tonic--on the order of cheap champagne--for the soul.
First let's dispense with that Pacers monstrosity. You know things are bad when 17 different players score points in the first quarter (look it up), which must be some kind of a record. At the end of the period, the Pacers were playing Diener, Baston, Rush, Nesterovic and Daniels, while the Wolves countered with Foye, Collins, Smith, Ollie and Carney. Tell me, who after Foye is the second-best, and then third-best player among that group, and why? If you are even trying to formulate an answer, you have an unhealthy love for NBA hoops and may god have mercy on your PF Flyers.
I am quite certain that Randy Foye had the worst 36 point game I've ever witnessed. Foye didn't get on the board until the first period was half over and the Wolves were down 6. He got 26 of his 36 in what amounted to a pair of garbage times at the end of each half: a stretch of 5:34 late in the second when he got 12, which had absolutely no effect on Indiana's 13-point lead; and the final 8:49 of the 4th, when he racked up 14, closing the gap from 19 to the final 7-point spread. Like the rest of his team, but especially Mike Miller, he did a lot of dribbling and dishing, dribbling and dishing, dribbling and dishing. Sometimes--too many times--the dishing was to the other team. Miller finished with 5 assists and 7 turnovers; Foye had 3 dimes and five miscues. Kevin McHale, who showed great restraint is dubbing the game "funky," offered up this simple rebuttal to the way the Wolves seemed to pass up open jumpers for more dribble-and-kick all night: On a typical possession, you can usually get one guy open. It is rare that there will be two guys open. If you are going to dribble [under those circumstances], most of the time you are going to dribble into a crowd.
A possible silver lining of all this dribbling and kicking was that Minnesota earned its way to the free throw line 41 times...and made 23 of those shots, meaning a franchise record 18 freebies were clanked by seven different players. Leading the miss parade was Craig Smith with a 3-8 performance at the charity stripe, to go with his 0-3 FG and 3 turnovers en route to a minus -18 ledger is a mere 10:23 of play.
Two nights later, the Rhino epitomized the renaissance of a gritty Wolves spirit that gave a taciturn Lakers ballclub the shivers before finally succumbing. One of the hallmarks of the Flip Saunders era was exploiting an advantageous matchup until the opponent adjusted, and when Smith found himself being guarded by forward Josh Powell--who had some pretty fair games against the Wolves last season while playing for the Clips--he went on a rampage. The first eleven points of the second period belonged to the pint-sized power forward with the flak jacket, and pretty much all of them came on the same play: Ollie and Jason Collins would execute a pick and roll, with the Lakers shrewdly not even bothering to look at Collins on the roll, but suddenly pinching in on Ollie, who would deliver to Smith, the other big, on a rudimentary dish that seemed to perplex the hell out of Powell (or was the Laker scheme to blame?). In a 101 second span from 10:15 to 8:34 of the second, Smith had four buckets (two layups, a 7' and a 5'), each on Ollie dimes. It was so much more pleasant, simple, and effective, than watching Timberwolves pinball around the wings dribbling and contorting themselves backwards for passes and then repeating the process ad nauseum. This time, the repetition was Collins/Ollie pick and roll, Ollie dish, Smith bucket. At the end of the evening, the Rhino was a fat 9-10 FG, and while zero assists and four turnovers marred the stat sheet to the point where he finished a mere zero on the +/- scale, he did get off the best line of the night when I asked him in the posgame locker room about the pick-and-roll variations that sprung him. "Yeah, I sort of Pink Panthered my way inside," Smith said witth a gleam in his eye, his cracked ribs temporarily forgotten. Slink on, Rhino, slink on.
Smith wasn't the only one rejuvenated on Sunday. Bassy Telfair followed up his putrid 1-9 FG night versus the Pacers with an eye-opening 9-17 FG against the purple and gold. But in truth, the whole team seemed more in sway and sync with each other. No doubt the Lakers' blatant overconfidence was a factor. Having poured in 132 points the last time the two ballclubs met three weeks ago, and perhaps knowing that a Pacers squad without Granger and Dunleavy hung 112 on Minnesota 48 hours earlier--the 6th straight game in which Minnesota had ceded at least 47% FG and 100+ points--LA simply didn't bother to defend consistently, preferring to rely on their ample firepower in a casual shootout. Bluntly put, they figured that if worst came to worst, Kobe Bryant would bail them out.
But Kobe had one of his worst games versus the Wolves, his 28-6-7 line nearly as misleading as Foye's 36 points from the previous game. The stat sheet handed out to the media at the end of the third period showed him with 7 turnovers and yet his final tally was 6, so some "error" was corrected; but in truth, the MVP charged on Jason Collins in the 4th--ran him right over--and didn't garner a whistle, one of many blown calls from the incompetent refs. Right after that non-call, he kept going and clanked a jumper which Lamar Odom tipped in. He missed a potentially crucial free throw. He had his shot blocked on a monster skywalk by Rodney Carney. Overall, it simply wasn't Kobe's night: he went 2-6 FG in the 4th while his teammates shot 8-17 FG, and picked up five of the team's six assists besides.
When it was over, both teams had shot 50% (Minnesota) or better (52.4% by the Lakers) deploying laissez-faire D that made for a highly entertaining 4th period. With the Wolves down 3 with 3:40 to play, Foye buried what looked like (and was initially ruled) a trey, with his foot slightly over the line. Out of a Laker timeout, Luke Walton countered with a three to boost the lead up to 4. On the next possession, a Mike Miller trey bounced it back to a one-point contest, only to have Derek Fisher answer with his own trey on LA's next possession--and Gomes's three when the Wolves came back down the floor. Kobe hit a turnaround two, and Bassy responded with an uncontested finger roll. In a span of 2:04, the teams had scored 8 points apiece--crunchtime H-O-R-S-E. And the folks who questioned their priorities after the Pacer loss walked out knowing that an undermanned Minnesota ballclub had kept it close all the way through--the biggest lead for either team from start to finish was 6 points. Maybe those fair-weather folks stopping by to see Kobe will come back for more.
2. Second-guessing McHale
Kevin McHale has mostly earned his coaching honeymoon. His ballclub executed a dramatic turnaround shortly after he took over and began preaching his faith in their performance, and they've continued to play hard--if not always well--in the wake of Jefferson's injury. But the Laker loss left him open to second-guessing, and coming from yours truly, the particulars here are pretty ironic.
As one who has seen the voodoo needlepoint men in an effort to concoct a curse on smallball, it pains me to note that Mac developed a fondness for that big lug Jason Collins that was a tad too lasting in tonight's second half, consigning the rook Kevin Love to the pine. I get the instinct: Love has been undressed in the paint most every game since Jefferson went down (see the defensive stats in the previous point in this trey), and Pau Gasol, Lamar Odom and Kobe were all drawing lots to see who should be granted the privilege of posting their man (respectively, Love, Gomes and Foye) up next. The Lakers shot 62.5% in the first half, and it would have been closer to 80% if folks like Derek Fisher and Jordan Farmar didn't decide a wide open midrange with more than 15 seconds on the shot clock was a better bet that a bunny in the post a mere five seconds and one entry pass later. Gasol was lunching off the top of Love's head, Odom was too quick and tall for Gomes, and Kobe posting Foye was elemental. Between the three of them, they were 19-26 FG in the first two periods.
But, ah, Collins wasn't helping. In fact Collins was minus -9 in 13:03 first half minutes, versus Love's plus +5 in 10:57. And when Love played the first 11:12 of the third period, he was plus +4. Yet he never found his way back on to the court: Collins went the final 12:48 and was minus -3. Working the abacus, that amounts to Love at a team-best plus +9 for 22:07 and Collins a team-worst minus -12 at 25:53. After the game, McHale cited Love's foul trouble for some of the limited burn (and as a rook he got screwed on at least two plays, a back-to-back hack by Odom on a shot and then a missed charge that was instead whistled a blocking foul on him late in the third), and praised Collins' low-post defense. True enough, Collins showed more of a pulse that the flabby effort he'd been clocking recently. But at the very least in the seesaw stages of crunchtime, when teams were shooting a lot of free throws, McHale could have substituted offense/defense with Love and Collins.
Criticism #2 is the curious DNP-Coach's Decision adjoining Brian Cardinal's name in the Wolves-Lakers box score. Of all the players who have stepped up in value since Jefferson's injury, Cardinal is at the head of the line. In the three games since the All Star break prior to the Lakers tilt, the Wolves have been a whopping plus +30 in the 52 minutes Cardinal has been on the court; meaning they have been minus -38 in the 92 minutes he sat. This is in keeping with a season-long trend. Right now, the Wolves are averaging plus +6.0 points per 48 minutes when Cardinal is on the court. Bassy Telfair is second on the club with plus +0.9 points per 48 minutes, and no other Timberwolf is in positive territory.
Cardinal does this with the basics. On offense, he moves the ball and then moves his feet. On defense, he keeps his head on a swivel, his brain active with the Wolves' schemes on rotations, his mouth moving to communicate, and his feet churning. Then there is the little rubber billy club he keeps in his shorts, and brings out to flatten his opponents whenever they become too impudent in the paint. At least I think that's why bodies (including Cardinal's) typically go flying and the opponents eyes open a little wider when Cardinal is in the game. It would have been nice to see what Cardinal might have done against Lamar Odom, who typically tortures the Wolves and who is widely renowned to be less than enamored with rugged contact underneath the hoop. From a talent and ability standpoint, Gomes is a much better option versus Odom. But Ryan Gomes is also a nice guy--just the way Odom likes the men matched up with him to be.
Finally, and most defensibly for McHale, was his decision to bench Rodney Carney after Carney had shown flashes of his January coming-out party, which was replete with deadly treys, breakout layups in transition, and hounddog defense. The back-to-back blocks Carney put on Tevor Ariza and then Kobe in the 4th quarter demonstrated that the pogo sticks in his hamstrings were singing from fine tuning. That McHale would want Foye, his clutch crunchtime shooter, in for the last 3:40 of a back-and-forth game is perfectly understandable. But it might have been nice to keep Carney going and sit Mike Miller, enabling Carney to stay on Kobe, with Foye switching over to Luke Walton. Yes, Walton would have a huge height advantage, but he's no taller than Peja Stokjokavic or Danny Granger, a pair of forwards that have been surprised by Foye's rejection of their shots in recent weeks. And not guarding Kobe could have enabled Foye to concentrate his energies on offense, where his last-possession trey fell about two-feet short as the Wolves went for a tie at the buzzer.
3. Telfair The Shooter: How Much Confidence is Too Much?
Remember most of last season and the early part of this one, when Wolves' opponents dared Telfair to shoot? Remember how wisely reluctant he was to comply? No more. When Telfair erupted for a team-high 30 points in the win over Miami, it was the pinnacle of a steady pattern that has seen Bassy be more and more willing to not only take what the D is offering him, but forcing the action and turning himself into one of the team's go-to shooters.
Well, the game after the Miami breakout, Telfair shot 1-9 FG in the loss to the Pacers. Undeterred, he had a team-tied high 17 FGA (and a team-tying 9 FG) versus LA. When I asked McHale if he was comfortable with Bassy launching 17 shots, the coach replied that if they were good shots, he had no problem with it. Then he explicitly said, "and Bassy had 17 good shots tonight." A few minutes later in the locker room, Telfair pronounced himself more confident in his shot than ever before and pointedly noted that guys needed to step up on offense in Jefferson's absence.
So, let's take a reality check. For the season, Telfair is shooting 35.2%. Over the course of his 4 and a half years in the NBA, his career accuracy is a hair over 39%. As a team the Wolves are shooting 44%. Even from three point range, Bassy's 34% from behind the arc is behind the team's composite accuracy of 34.4%. What makes this especially maddening is that Bassy can keep the basketball on a string like no other Timberwolf. On Sunday he crossed over to his left hand and then zipped a pass half the distance of the court, a la Steve Nash, to a teammate just outside the three-point arc for a hopeful heave at the halftime buzzer. A slo-mo of some of his dribble moves seems a mixture of hip hop, ballet, and computer graphics. Just make sure you stop the tape before he goes up to shoot.
Maybe someday we'll discover who put the silver helmets over the heads of Telfair and Miller, flipped a switch, and exchanged their personalities. Miller, who by all indications fancies himself as a point guard in a plodding 6-8 body, has shot 27-52 FG over the last six games, with 34 assists and 21 turnovers. During that same period, Telfair is shooting 32-73 FG with 31 assists and 10 turnovers. Hey here's an idea: How about if the guy with the career 46% FG (47.7% this year) shoots a little more often instead of executing snazzy turnovers while the guy with the team's best assist-to-turnover ratio drops a few more dimes instead of blowing jumpers? Then, just maybe, the Wolves wouldn't rank near the bottom of the NBA in FG efficiency.
Last but not least, among those 17 "good shots" Telfair attempted on Sunday, not one was a free throw.
Interesting point on Bassy/Miller. What drives me crazy is Miller bringing the ball up the floor in the break-out after he gets a rebound and Bassy is sitting right there waiting for the quick handoff. It happens way too often.
It's not that Miller is incapable of bringing the ball up--his handle is decent--but it limits options. You've got 34% Bassy spotting up in the corner and Miller, who doesn't even have two assists per turnover, initiating the offense from the top.
I'd bet this arrangement costs Bassy at least two dimes a game and Miller five or six points. It makes no sense whatsoever, and I wish McHale would put a stop to it. Let the jet fast PG handle the rock and let the dead-eye shooter spot up.
SFJ--
Excellent microcosm of what I was getting at. I know I said I'd accept Miller for what he obvious is going to remain this season, but as teams clamp down on Foye because they no longer have to worry about Jefferson (or Miller, the non-shooter), the option falls to Telfair nearly by default. I wish he'd recognize, and eschew. It would be much easier if Miller handed the ball over and spotted up.
The sad part about this is that there is no better player for getting the ball in Bassy's hands beyond the arc and with less than 5 seconds on the shot clock than Miller. He excels at it.
Great stuff, Britt. Glad to have the continued coverage.
While I'm skeptical of +/- as a reliable measure of a player's value, I think it accurately showed the difference between Telfair and Ollie, on Friday night vs Indiana. With Bassy in there, the defense was kept off-balance and constantly adjusting. Shots were open instead of contested and the pace of the game favored the Wolves. In those 31 minutes, the Wolves won by 7. With Ollie in there, we had the ball being dribbled by our stationary point guard at the top of the key, eventually passing it to a non-playmaking wing like Mike Miller (or at least he needs to be told he's not a playmaker) without enough time left on the shotclock to reset and give something else a try. I really wish Bassy would play 35-40 minutes, instead of 31. I thought the difference was on full-display and the numbers backed it up, in this case. On Sunday's game, the +/- was less accurate as between these two players. Rhino was dominating the Lakers' 2nd Unit and Ollie pulled out a +3 out of it. Bassy took on Kobe & Co. to a meager -6. In any case, I think the Wolves have one capable point guard, at least when you factor in the lack of playmaking wing players and the need for dribble penetration from the point.
Regarding Bassy the Shooter: the difference between Bassy shooting more and Miller driving more is that in Bassy's case, he needs to become more of a scoring threat in order to become a better point guard. In Miller's case, he is a spot-up shooter on his best day and nothing much more than that. By dribble-penetrating all the time, he is honing a skill that he is best off not even having. I cringe when Bassy shoots because I hate his technique. But if he's ever going to be a big-league point guard, he needs to command more attention. If he can rip off some more 50+ point 3-game sequences, that might start to happen.
Brandon Rush is a smooth player who will have a long, productive career. While Bayless has some upside that Rush may not, the Jayhawk would fit perfectly into the current Portland situation, with Outlaw being a sometimes malcontent without a consistent-enough jumpshot.
The Laker bench--at least when Odom is a starter--is a little bit overrated. For whatever reason, analysts go nuts because they get a boost of energy from Farmar, Ariza and Sasha. I think they fail to realize that almost every team has guys that can come in and light it up once in a while (See McCants, Rhino, Carney). I just don't think those Laker guys are anything signifcantly better than your average NBA bench.
I was really annoyed that Love was not in during crunch time, when Lamar Odom was owning the boards. It should have been Collins, Love, Gomes/Miller, Foye and Telfair.
Back to Bassy/Miller. If this is how it's going to be, then I'd prefer to see Bassy take what the defense gives him with 100% confidence rather than hesitating. Indecisiveness kills and passing on open looks allows the defense to call the shots, which I think is not an option.
The onus is on Bassy to make the defense pay. He's gotten some great breaks to the rim lately because word is getting out that he can hit a long jumper.
I agree completely on your rotation questions. Four fouls is no reason to keep Love on the bench with 3 minutes to go. At about the same point in the game it dawned on me as Cardinal stood in his sweats for a time out that he had not seen the floor. That bent my brow. Carney should have been out there too, although I must say the five Kevin went with did a pretty nice job down the stretch. A couple better calls by the refs nmay have made it a different outcome.
I'm trying to put my finger on McHale's philosophy and approach to who gets on the floor. Making the guys feel good seems like a huge part of McHale's MO. That instinct and posture is appropriate and helpful on balance. He also likes to "ride guys out" more than the coaching norm. Again, that longer leash has its upside. But I wonder if these tendencies lead to sub-optimal in-game moves as well. Collins was the flavor of the night and probably should have sat down at crunch time.
For McHale to become Mr. Right (as opposed to Mr. Right Now) as coach, he needs to leaven the feel good players' coach instincts that come so naturally for him.
My feelings about last night - ARRRGG!
I am glad you said it Briit - I am sick and tired of the preferential treatment the NBA referees give the "star" players. Kobe's charge on Collins, the blatant push off Foye...I could go on and on. Memo to David Stern: I don't buy my tickets because I want to see Kobe - I buy them because I want to cheer MY team on to victory. If I start believing they have no chance against specific teams, I will stop buying tickets for those games. Put that in your economic plan and smoke it.
Cardinal was +5 in 9 minutes in the last Laker game and tonight he does not get off the bench. Love does not see the floor in the 4th. Memo to McHale: Don't get cute on us. Play the normal rotation. Give the kids the experience. Collins is not on our roster next year - he does NOT need to play right now over minutes for Love. Stick to the plan.
Finally, memo to Mike Miller: Shoot the ball! Unless you have earned enough money already to cover your lifetime, you will need/want another NBA contract. It is NOT going to be as a point guard! So, stop it now and get back to what you were hired to do - shoot the ball.
Argh - sorry about being so pissy. It was a tough night at the Target Center.
Chuckle. Clearly, I must "have an unhealthy love for NBA hoops", because I was busily formulating my pecking order when I got to that line...
Cheers for Telfair's recent shooting. He will need to differentiate between the spoon feeds from Miller from the ones he creates (or is *given* by a defense). But confidence is a big part of shooting, and it seems he is getting some. Let's hope it stays with him and he takes the next step in developing into a well-rounded PG. I'll cut a little slack for the moment about trying to draw contact -- this is the 2nd season he's had to play extended minutes. Asking him to change his game to go draw a lot of contact on top of the marathon minutes seems a little unfair.
Jeers for Foye's defense. I've seen better defense by matadors. Whatever excuses were offered while he was assigned to play the point don't apply at off guard. Wade and Kobe repeatedly exposed Foye as little more than a Bott's Dot on the road to the basket.
I'm with Britt on the head scratching over McHale's decision making about who is on the floor, when and why. I don't see Collins as the type of player to be the lone big on a smallball team. And no Cardinal?
Re Britt's question re why Miller and not Carney to close out the Lakers game, we must remember that Carney had played the first 8 minutes of the 4th, with Miller on the bench for five of those. Maybe you bring Carney back for the final minute or two -- but leaving him in down the stretch is probably not what to do.
Miller has been doing the same drive and dish for the whole year. At some point do you have to assume it is part of the organizational plan?
I anticipated Miller shooting more and better after Jefferson went down, simply because shooting is such a rythm/comfort event. While shooting better, and marginally more, the drive and dish(often poorly) is still a large part of his arsenal. ?
Good points. I think the main thing that contributes to Telfair's inconsistency is his slight frame. How many guards that small have historically been long-distance threats? I can think of Michael Adams (former Nugget) and that's about it. I think he is improving in that area, but here's to hoping that he scraps that shot on those nights when it's not going in.
What did other people think about the turnovers? The Wolves had a lot of them come from bad passes or just forgetting that the Lakers like to be predatory and poke the ball away when it's not expected.
Hey, they hung with the Lakers. And I don't buy that the Lakers were coasting until the end. I didn't see any lack of effort or intensity on their part. I think the Wolves played a fine game against the league's best team. At least we're not mailing it in like the shameful - I can't think of another word to describe them - L.A. Clippers.
I wonder if there is some explanation for Love's absence in the fourth quarter, beyond McHale riding Collins or being stupid.
For example, maybe Love wasn't doing some of those little things quite right and McHale wanted to emphasize it.
Or perhaps, the Lakers 3 on 1 rebounding strategy was wearing on Love emotionally as well as physically.
I've noticed a couple of times where Love gets pissed after a missed layup or rebound, lets out a scream or gets one of his crazy facial expressions. I've seen him motion to the bench after these action to indicate that he is OK and has calmed down. But often, McHale takes him out of the game after these little outbursts.
I wonder if Love was becoming too emotional with the play of Odom and not getting calls, etc.
I'm not saying I agree with McHale's strategy, just searching for some logic behind his moves.
Hey Britt,
It will be tough without Al the rest of the way. So for us diehards, it's nice to get those little tidbits like Craig's pink panther quote...keep them coming!
I too would like to see more Carney, he really bothered Kobe last night. Carney seems to be the only long athletic wolves player who is healthy at the moment, I hope the wolves FO re-sign him to a multiyear contract much like bassy or rhino's deal. For this undersized team, having two long athletic players under contract (Brewer and Carney) would be good thing.
Paging Stanley, I think the turnovers are a result of growing pains associated with Big Al being gone. We are focusing much more on dribble drive action, which is much more prone to turnovers than dumping the ball into Al.
I know Britt has opined numerous times on Miller's reluctance to play the long-range shooting game the Wolves thought they were geting when the acquired him on draft night last year. But what do you think of the theory that McHale just doesn't have the "onions" to tell him to play like he should be playing. Less 'drive and dish' and moving the ball around the perimeter to more looking for the trey. Miller has a nice all around game, he doesn't seem to lack for any skills, but shooting is what made him what he is, and now maybe it is a case of the inmates running the prison. You would think a hall-of-fame player, now coach, would be able to express what his desire is to Miller on how to score when in the game and then to make it happen, but Kev just seems to stay with Miller and what he is doing versus demanding that MM return to his long range jump shooting persona. I went to the Pacers game, and I just don't get it. He launched a three in the early going and then clanked one, and that was it till the 4th quarter. He should be licking his chops to shoot the three, but he is doing the opposite. Who is in charge? Tell him what you want and demand it. I think he is afraid to lose Miller and/or the locker room with such a demand. It's just so odd, hard to comprehend.
Lakers fan here. Take with appropriate grain of salt.
I thought, by and large, a good performance by the Wolves. They were helped by the Lakers' poor help decisions; many of the Wolves' open treys were set up by Laker defenders helping off shooters at the perimeter (I'm looking at YOU, Luke Walton). The Wolves obliged by hitting those open shots. Nobody defends the arc perfectly--it's one of the hardest things to do because there's so much arc to cover (one of the underappreciated consequences of the longer trey)--but it sure seems as though the Lakers get this wrong time and time again. To their credit, the Wolves took advantage.
Smith in particular impressed. It wasn't a total surprise; I've seen him go off before, but his efficiency was the real eye-opener. For a big stocky guy he has some nice finesse finishes to go with it all.
I disagree that the referee *blew* the charge call on Kobe. The ref was standing right there, so you can't fault his positioning (my most common complaint about referees are them trying to officiate from a bad vantage point). Evidently he felt it was a flop and/or not entirely set. I thought it was a bit of both--more flop than not set--but obviously I'm biased. (I also thought that fantastic block of Kobe's 12-footer was headed downward already, but I don't think that was a bad call at all.)
Say hey, Brian.
Yes, at the time, I thought Kobe's apparent charging foul went unpunished, but the replay from underneath the basket looked more like there was very little contact and some nice flop work. For my entertainment dollar, the entire game looked as if the Lakers were trying to mail in a performance and almost got caught with postage due.
BTW, folks, Brian visits us from the unfettered realm of "old time" Usenet newsgroups, specifically alt.sports.basketball.nba.la-lakers and is one of the more respected and erudite posters there. It's a very active group, over 3800 postings this month alone. To contrast, the corresponding Wolves newsgroup, alt.sports.basketball.nba.mn-wolves is on lifesupport, with a piteous nine postings this month.
That Brian even found us here speaks volumes.
Zeke,
I don't think its a question of "onions." It is not as if Miller is playing badly or hurting the team. Its a question of how he can help the team most. Hes a shooter and he went through a long slump. But, even slumping, you would think that he was a better shooting option than others on the court. But, its not as if without Miller shooting his value on the court is completely useless. hes a veteran and hes getting other players involved in the offense and hes getting rebounds. So, I'm not sure that it would be prudent to give Miller an ultimatum, shoot or else sit. I think McHale is a little flabbergasted by Miller's reluctance to shoot and hes tried to encourage him, but Miller seems boneheaded about it, but again, its not like his presence on the floor hurts the Wolves or as if McHale has a better option than Miller on a nightly basis. What McHale needs is some more options who play Miller's position to demonstrate to Miller the value of long range shooting and that he'll be rewarded with more playing time when he takes those shots. Right now, McHale just doesn't have anyone who he can summon off the bench that can send that message to Miller.
I disagree. His rebounding is great and he does keep the ball moving, but I think he is hurting the team when he passes up looks so he can drive and kick to Telfair or Cardinal. Of course they have to take those shots, but I'd rather have Miller shooting the ball.
Also when he waves off Bassy and brings the ball up himself, that hurts the team. He can't get up the floor as quickly, he doesn't drive and kick nearly as well as Bassy and when he's not spotting up, the Wolves lose the benefit of having one of the NBA's best shooters available on the perimeter.
Well, I'm not sure we disagree. My point is that it would hurt the WOlves more to sit Miller down than it would help them. Having onions and saying to Miller either shoot the damn ball or you are not going to play might not have the desired effect of making the team better, if Miller decides to still stubbornly elect to pass it instead of shoot it. Because there is not a better option off the bench than Miller, even if he isn't shooting.
I think McHale has a style of coaching that isn't about taking a hard line with players and I think it works well with the modern NBA player. He lets the players play bacsketball, run the floor and play. He has some ideas about how to play and what sets to run and pounding it into big Al or exploitign certain matchups, but he isn't from the Bobby Knight school like WIttman was. I think Miller is playing the game. He should shoot more and he should let Telfair bring the ball up, but Mchale also has this thing about players being players and not necessarily point guards, small forwards, shooting guards, power forwards and centers. If a guy get the ball and wants to turn around and dribble it up court while playing the game and having fun, as long as he doesn't miss the open pass and is pushing the ball, McHale is okay with that. Probably because he's a former 6'10" power forward who played with players and during an era when many players defied traditional roles and attmepted things outside their skillset. Just 10 guys running up and down the court going after it. I think McHale likes to stay within those bounds and not take too much control of the game.
You are probably right as far as strategy, but McHale's style fits in better with players than the Wittman style and I think he's done nothing if not proven that.
Baseball:
Warning Track Power by Alex Halsted
Sports:
On the Ball by Britt Robson
Weather:
Dude Weather by Jimmy Gaines
Fiction:
Write Now! by Terry Faust
Hockey:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Style:
Hook & Eye
Misc:
Is This News?
Fiction:
Yo, Ivanhoe by Brad Zellar
Food:
Consider the Egg by Stephanie March
Wine:
Beyond the Cask
Food:
Food Fight!
Media:
To the Slaughter
Misc:
Outrage by Staff
Food:
Chef's Table
Guest Commentary:
Just Passing Through
Humor:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Cars:
Road Rake by Chris Birt
Commentary:
Read Menace by Tom Bartel
Society:
The Adventures of Melinda by Melinda Jacobs
Politics:
Defenestrator by Rich Goldsmith
Food:
Breaking Bread by Jeremy Iggers & Ann Bauer
Books:
Cracking Spines by Max Ross
Music:
Hear, Hear by Staff
Art:
The Vicious Circle by 6 Critics
Secrets:
Secrets of the Day by Kate Iverson
Theater:
Seen in the City by Staff
Film:
Talk About Talkies by Staff