Dude Weather Subscribe to Secrets Minneapolis / St. Paul
Photo copyright 2008 NBAE (Photo by David Sherman/NBAE via Getty Images)
Game #13, Home Game #7: Minnesota 102, Phoenix 110
Game #14, Road Game #7: Minnesota 105, Oklahoma City 103
Game #15, Home Game #8: Minnesota 97, Denver 106
Season record: 4-11
1. Flailing
If you want the glass to be half-full on this unfolding Timberwolves season, you can note that the team has split its last six games, including wins over Eastern contenders Philly and Detroit, after enduring an 8-game losing streak. Of course that pattern--a stronger finish after a terrible start-- is one reason why folks were more optimistic about the team's chances this season in the first place. In that sense, the Wolves first month of the season is a microcosm of their entire 2007-08 campaign. Bottom line, their current record of 4-11 (.267), is as statistically similar to last year's 22-60 (.268) won-lost ledger as possible. Same as it ever was.
The three games played over the Thanksgiving holiday likewise feel familiar to a year ago. Signs of progress don't feel bankable, mostly because the plan is muddled, the performances relatively inconsistent. The chicken-or-egg quandary about whether the underlying problem is lack of talent or not enough synergy of the talent on hand (or what combination of both) continuing to be a vexing mystery.
Let's get specific. When Craig Smith picked up his third foul with 1:07 left to play in the first quarter of tonight's game against Denver, Coach Randy Wittman went back to Jason Collins alongside rookie Kevin Love, who, 70 seconds earlier, had begun giving Al Jefferson his typical late first-quarter rest. It was far from an ideal situation, as Collins has never been remotely offensive-minded and Love is enduring rookie pains that may or may not have to do with him being frequently overmatched physically in the paint. In other words, goodbye low-post scoring. From that 1:07 left in the first through the first 1:58 of the second, the Wolves went from a four point lead to a one point deficit-- minus -5 in 3:05. But context made the substitutions defensible--the Rhino was in heavy foul trouble and Big Al needed a blow. Still, there was a dramatic change when Wittman subbed in Jefferson for Collins, especially the impact on Love. The Wolves' next ten points came on, respectively, a Love tip-in, a Jefferson slam off a feed from Randy Foye, another Love tip-in, a running lay-up from Jefferson, and a Jefferson alley-oop layup from Bassy Telfair. Of course because Collins is currently the team's best interior defender, Denver was likewise scoring with regularity at the other end, but that one-point deficit had been reversed back to a two-point lead for Minnesota.
Then, with the score tied and 1:43 left in the half, Ryan Gomes fouls Melo Anthony. And as Anthony is busy converting his two free throws, Wittman is pulling Jefferson in favor of Collins, once again setting up a Collins-Love frontcourt. Why was this happening? It is not as if Jefferson needed a rest--he'd sat the first two minutes of the period, and had halftime coming in 103 seconds (Love, on the other hand, had played the entire period). Yes, he had two fouls, but with the Wolves about to take possession after Melo's free throws and just 1:43 on the clock, there weren't going to be that many defensive stops required--and if he picked up a third foul, it didn't seem that onerous. In any case, as he walked off the court, Jefferson had a sour, slightly bewildered look on his face. Somewhat predictably, the Wolves went scoreless the rest of the quarter, heading into the halftime locker room with their largest deficit of the game, trailing 60-54. In two stints totalling 4:48, the Collins-Love combo was minus -9, a time in which the Wolves' offense managed just 4 points.
Admittedly, this is a classic second-guess situation. I've driven the bandwagon arguing for steady minutes for Collins ever since he became healthy enough to play. If I had written a three-pointer right after last night's last-second win over Oklahoma City, I'd have been noting that while Craig Smith had a marvelous game, riding Smith and Jefferson as the frontcourt duo down the stretch necessitated that the defensively challenged Big Al guard Chris Wilcox, who first torched the Wolves for 15 fourth-quarter points and then commanded double teams that creates a pair of treys that nearly won the game for the Thunder. I understand Wittman's dilemma, that the frontcourt rotations are a defense-vs-offense give-and-take. But after that tough first stint together, I didn't think Collins-Love in the final 1:43 of the half was going to serve the Wolves well. And they didn't.
But where things become discouragingly muddled is listening to the message sent by the coach in his postgame press conference. Wittman blamed the loss on his team's lack of aggressiveness toward the basket, versus the way the Nuggets attacked the rim. He said when they threw it in the low block to Jefferson, compelling the double team and the kickout to others on the perimeter, that nobody penetrated to the rim to exploit the situation. He cited the whopping 33-10 disparity in free throws as proof. He added that "we didn't step it up when they made their run" in the third quarter. And he specifically called out Randy Foye for not generating free throws, saying of Foye, "he's got to be one of those guys. He shoot one free throw. He has the size and strength and he's got to get to the line more."
I thought that when the main components of the Wolves' offense were in the game, the rudiments of the offensive philosophy functioned pretty well, making this postgame criticism situation and small-bore, a pattern that creates the impression of Wittman as nit-picker.
At the beginning of the season, most observers, myself included, thought the offense would rely on spacing and the inside-outside potential of Jefferson's low post potency and an array of perimeter sharpshooters led by Mike Miller but including Foye and Shaddy McCants. Yeah, penetration would be part of the arsenal, but watching Jefferson empty his trick bag of paint maneuvers and gleaning the catch-and-shoot swishes of the long-range deadeyes felt like the primary components. Then Miller decided he was going to demonstrate his "complete player" skills, turning down viable shots (especially for someone of his marksmanship) in favor of the extra pass, or, indeed, taking his man off the dribble in hopes of a layup or a foul. It was maddening to watch this 52% shooter trying to set up his 44% brethren en route to compiling a fairly nifty assist-to-turnover ratio that was nevertheless inferior to Foye's, and not getting to the line very often to boot. Then, lo and behold, on Friday night in Oklahoma City, Miller aggressively went for his shot for the second time all season (the first being the overtime loss to the Spurs). Even when he was misfiring (4-11 FG in the first half), it opened up the floor and sharpened his eye. Perhaps it is a rationalization, but I think when go-to shooters attempt a few jumpers with a tougher degree of difficulty, the "easy" ones become even easier to convert. Whatever the case, Miller's 17th FGA of the night was a cold-blooded game-winner off an upfake on the baseline with a tenth of a second left.
The Thunder game showcased the Wolves' offensive potential. With Miller a constant threat to unload his accurate jumper, Jefferson being his usual load down low, and Craig Smith taking advantage of his unique matchup capabilities in the 'tweener game, the inside-outside offense worked extremely well. Jefferson and Smith combined for 42 points and got to the line 23 times, just the two of them. Point guards Foye and Telfair had 11 assists versus just three turnovers between them. Like Miller, they also never generated a shooting foul and were a combined 0-0 from the line.
And yes, that was the inept OKC Thunder, who hadn't beaten anyone but the Wolves (four weeks ago) in 16 tries. The Nuggets, who had won 9 of 12 since acquiring Chauncey Billups, would obviously be much tougher on this home end of the back-to-back for Minnesota. Yet, the inside-outside offense was still nicely established on Saturday. Often through the good efforts of Foye, who led the team with six assists, Miller had a plethora of choice, wide-open looks. That he shot a miserable 2-10 FG, including a horrific 0-6 from beyond the arc, quite simply is what cost the Wolves the ballgame; that and woeful defense that allowed Billups to go off for 27 points on only 9 official shots from the field.But defense aside, I can't think of a single one of those 10 shots from Miller that didn't make perfect sense in the flow of the offense. Meanwhile, Foye was a nifty 11-20 FG, albeit just 2-6 3ptFG and with that lone free throw. But that's still 25 points to go with five rebounds and six dimes (and four turnovers). Was getting to the rim really the thing you want planted in his head after that kind of performance?
If Wittman wanted to criticize the ballclub in a manner that felt consistent, he could have harped on the perimeter defense. In each of the past three games, the opposing point guards--Phoenix's Steve Nash and Seattle's Russell Westbrook before Billups--could get pretty much wherever they wanted to go, and generate offense via either the pass or the shot with a mere modicum of sweat equity. But the message he told his team after the Denver loss seems similar to his postgame press conference. "I should have gotten to the free throw line more. That's my fault; I've got to get my act together," said Foye in the locker room. Added Jefferson a few minutes later, "They decided to turn it up and we didn't, we didn't match their energy... They got in attack mode and we didn't match that."
Not so very long ago when the Wolves were enduring an eight-game losing streak, Foye was being blistered by me and others for being bereft of both his customary shooting eye and his still-missing point guard skills. But in the three previous games to Denver (two of them wins), he'd compiled a gaudy 26/6 assist-to-turnover ratio and seemed to be getting more relaxed. The fact that he'd only attempted 4 free throws in those three games seemed beside the point.
During that same down period when Miller was ostentatiously passing up shots, Wittman offered some sage insight: His new shooting guard was rushing too much, not noticing all the good shooting opportunities flying by. Now, on a night (ironically "Mike Miller Night" at Target Center) when he was mostly measured and definitely judicious with his shots, Wittman is talking about getting to the line and meeting their attack mode in kind. That's a mixed message. Even a little context would have been invaluable, something like, "we were spacing the floor well and getting good shots, but they weren't falling and when that happens we needed to try and make some more things happen in the paint."
Or not. After 15 games, I'm not totally sure what the offensively philosphy of this team is anyway. Certainly a primary objective is pounding the ball down to Jefferson in the block--an admirable bit of bedrock upon which to build. But the tone as well as the philosophy seems to shift, as the coach variously castigates and calls out his troops--he expressed shock at their lack of readiness for Phoenix--and praises them for their effort. And while the defense--the coach's stated top priority--has improved significantly since the long losing streak, only two players who have been assigned relatively bit roles--Collins and Corey Brewer--seem to identify as defenders first and foremost. The recognizable faces and personalities of the franchise, from Jefferson to Foye to McCants to Miller to Love, are all more comfortable slinging the rock than preventing it from being slung.
2. Rediscovering Gomes
Yet another reason to like Jason Collins is that he has bumped all the Minnesota "big men" a notch down the paint-defending pecking order and thus returned Ryan Gomes to his rightful value as a solid 'tweener defender and an overall jack of all trades. With the Thanksgiving holiday affording me the rare opportunity to get off my treadmill of deadlines and poke around, I went to the treasure trove of Wolves links provided by Sonia at twolvesblog.com (highly recommended) and found a summary of the Phoenix-Wolves game by Charlie Rosen, a hoops analyst I respect quite a bit but rarely read. Rosen mentioned something that I discovered last year, then began to automatically assume, and then took for granted so thoroughly that it fell out of my thought process: That Ryan Gomes is the Wolves' best, perhaps only, two-way player.
This weekend's past two games have reinforced that wisdom. Gomes has been called upon to be the primary defender against the opponent's top scorer: Kevin Durant on Friday and then Melo Anthony tonight. The former is lithe and lanky, the latter explosive and deceptively rugged. Both are natural born scorers. Gomes held each below 40% shooting and was especially effective against Durant. Tonight, while his teammates were shooting 3-19 3ptFG, Gomes hit 3-4 from beyond the arc and had a typically clandestine 11 points. All of us can only hope that the days of a noncomplaining warrior like Gomes brawling in the paint with much longer and/or wider power forwards is a thing of the past.
3. Ups and Downs
The Greek tragedy that is Rashad McCants's tenure as the savior and/or enfant terrible of the Wolves' offense feels like it is headed for its climactic act. After three years of working the yo-yo on the roller coaster, Shaddy seems in danger of flat-lining in the dungeon with his latest offerings, beginning, after being sidelined with a back ailment, with a memorably grotesque 3:17 stretch against Phoenix where he committed three blatant turnovers, then appeared genuinely perplexed that he was given the Showtime At The Apollo hook With the Wolves down 13 with 2:25 to play, Wittman reinserted him for some desperation treys, and of course McCants, banged home a trio of them--shots he never makes when the score is very close--to make it interesting down the stretch. That didn't prevent him from earning a DNP-CD against Oklahoma City Friday. Tonight he got two brief stints: A 2:53 stretch in the second quarter when he immediately turned the ball over on a lazy pass and then shot on airball on a jumper from the corner; and a 2:58 run at the end of the third where he stole the ball from Billups and went two-man with Gomes down for a layup, then nailed a trey near the end of the quarter. Back in his sweats on the sideline as his teammates began preparing for the 4th quarter down 17, he erupted with an angry, hurt, howling scream that made a few people around him, including some teammates, jump.
The math is difficult. With Gomes splitting small forward with an improving Corey Brewer since Collins returned, McCants is hovering around that last musical chair in the rotation, after the starters are done their first stints and in competition to when Telfair kicks Foye to off-guard and Miller temporarily goes to the bench. But Miller is second only to Jefferson in minutes and Bassy has to play enough for Foye to rest. I've always felt that McCants is too talented and, over time, has produced enough better-than-expected numbers, to be unceremoniously dumped a la JR Rider. The guy is nitroglycerin in all its positive and negative manifestations. But the balance is tilting against him, the wildly inconsistent play hasn't abated, restricted free agency looms on the horizon, and the good-citizen replacements for the Shaddy-drama are perhaps becoming less troublesome solutions. Of course a 40-point eruption, or, less likely, a series of well-played, thoroughly integrated team peformances, could restore his luster and make the latest blips on the radar seem much less onerous. You never know when the carney is going to pull the lever and stop the ride.
Over at Clankers Anonymous, Corey Brewer seems ready to graduate from the program with a recent (if brief) string of confident performances. Following in the immortal steps of Malik Seally, Anthony Peeler and the great Sam Mitchell, Brewer has become a drifter to the corner, where the trey distance is shortest and defenders generally tend to forget about him. If this team does indeed want to emphasize defense and also get out on the break more often, increased minutes for Brewer would help the die-hards imagine a better future ahead.
Telfair is less encouraging, especially after his 1-8 FG tonight dropped his shooting percentage perilously close to 35%, a figure somewhat redeemed by his robust 8-17 mark from beyond the 3pt line. Bassy is hands-down the best passer on the team, and probably the best dribbler. Fortunately, that's enough to lock down the backup point guard position. But the longer his career seems sabotaged by this one skill flaw, the more thoroughly he's going to have to rebut it on the court. I remember Sid Lowe in the twilight of his career at conversely the first two seasons in Wolves history--opponents literally backed away when he received the ball, not only daring but taunting him to shoot. Bassy has tried to forestall this circumstance by firing away when he has a wide open look. But the percentages aren't with him. How much longer can we say he's young and has time to shore up this aspect of his arsenal?
what's the most we could get for mccants at this point?
I'm confused. If the offense centers on Big Al and the pivot. Wouldn't you want to make parameter and mid-range shots to force the defense off the double teams?
If so, why would you then want Foye or Miller pushing the ball to the rim? Into a packed defense? You would have just as much of a chance of getting shots blocked or stolen than getting to the free throw line.
The problem was that Miller had an uncharacteristically bad shooting night. The defense double and triple teamed Big Al daring the Wolves to attempt parameter shots.
Miller's one weakness is that he has a hard time creating his own shot (see Wally World).
Q: what's the most we could get for mccants at this point?
A: A toaster.
Collins' expiring deal, Foye, Miller, Jefferson, Love, and the top 2 1st rounders (their own + Miami's) are probably their only movable assets at this point. I can't say that any of these guys should be considered off the table in terms of a deal.
Good wrap-up. I didn't watch the Phoenix game and thought it a shame that the Denver game wasn't televised. As for McCants, my favorite solution is the one SnP has been pushing: give him minutes as the lead guard.
With that probably unlikely, the second solution is to think extensively about whether Miller is someone who could be with this team long-term and then make the choice to either move him or move McCants. I kind of liked Bill Simmons' idea for a trade with the Cavs for Wally and J.J. Hickson if they don't plan to keep Miller after his contract expires. As long as that trade included a first-rounder (maybe in 2011 to see if they lose LeBron and go into a spiral), it would make some sense because J.J. Hickson is an athletic and active player with a good touch who might fit well next to Jefferson. I wouldn't look forward to a Wally redux, but the other two pieces might be worth it. If they do, though, they should trade McCants in Gerald Green-type deal.
Those aren't the only two options, but they're the best ones for McCants and the team.
CA--
Yup, that's pretty much what I was trying to say, but in a more long-winded fashion. And fortunately I have an editing function so that when I say parameter instead of perimeter (and that stuff happens, as folks who get my pre-edited first-cut late-night prose know), I can go back and change it.
I know this doesn't show up in the stats and such, but Ryan Gomes and his wife are immensely likable people.
I think the best odds of making a trade will involve Craig Smith. I love me some Rhino but his value will never be higher, he's largely redundant on the Wolves' roster, and there are some teams out there that would be interested in a low-post scorer. For instance, Chicago. Smith for Noah would benefit both sides - though I imagine the Wolves would have to throw in something extra - maybe one of their mid/late 1st rnd picks.
Noah would be the perfect compliment for Big Al - no offense, all D and rebounding.
I realize the Rhino can't be traded until Dec 15 because he just signed a contract but I hope something along these lines happens after that date.
I would disagree that McCants is only worth a toaster, given some of the prices I saw last Black Friday in the stores. I would wager only a small amount of money--the economy being what it is--that there's some GM/VP out there who thinks that all that athletic knucklehead needs is a second chance in a new location. Don't get me wrong, I think he was a wrong draft choice to begin with, but really, exactly who HAS been a great fit here, at least in the last few years? Not that many. The Wolves continue to bring out the flaws in everyone's game.
Of course, Minnesota isn't helping any by burying him at the end of the bench. Here's where this team has put themselves in a pickle. You need to play him a little bit, at least in places where showcasing his talents could lead to some stimulating trade talk. But if they're convinced Shaddy can't help them to win any more than the 22 times of last year in order to demonstrate progress, well, Joseph Heller couldn't have written this story any better.
I think its great how Collins grabbed zero rebounds in 18 minutes.
Telfair probably would be shooting at around 45% if he didn't get blocked 10% of the time.
Randy Foye should take it to the rack more but his play as of late has been really good.
McCants for Gerald Green.
From Glen Taylor on down, I couldn't agree more -- though I'd never thought of it exactly that way.
"H" asks what could the Wolves get for Rashad McCants. I think of him as undersized for a shooting guard, thus significantly disadvantaged on defense, and doubt his ability to make shots when guarded by virtually any determined defender -- especially when the game is close. Maybe someone else can think of a team that wants such a player, but not me. And I haven't even touched on his "personality". Perhaps the Wolves were hoping that he would deliver on whatever promise they saw in him on draft night in this final year of his contract, but the DNP-CD vs OKC pretty much takes the air out of that balloon. I think that the Wolves will likely retain him to pick up his salary space.
I suspect that two teams might have some interest in Rashad.
The first is Cleveland. In a pre-season radio interview, Shaddy was asked what coach he would like to play for, other than Wittman (of course, hah). He named Mike Brown. When asked what player he'd like to play with, he named LeBron, who he apparently does some off-season workouts with. Maybe the Rashad-Cavs love affair runs only in one direction, but I could see him being a valuable side-kick to LBJ.
The second is Charlotte. MJ already has two guys from the '05 Tarheels, so why not a third? Also, they have a lot of salaries that they might want to dump. If the Wolves could swing a deal for Gerald Wallace--which would probably have to involve a 1st Round pick and/or taking a bad contract, it could be worth it. Such a deal would probably put Brewer's future in MN on the rocks, though, since the Brewer-Wallace is pretty redundant (with Wallace being an overall better player, obviously) and wouldn't collectivly provide enough outside shooting.
Andy G:
We all know what any trade involving Charlotte and McHale would involve: Mr. Adam Morrison. :)
Next year when the team takes Ty Hansborough and brings back Marko, McHale's 6'8" white out dream will be complete: Marko, Miller, Morrison, Love, and Madsen with Hansborough coming off the bench. Here's my best attempt at a MJ/McHale GM-off:
http://www.canishoopus.com/2008/12/1/676510/game-day-a-match-of-equals
To the Bobcats:
* Rashad McCants
* Jason Collins
* Corey Brewer
* Calvin Booth
* conditional 1st rounder
To the Wolves:
* Raymond Felton
* Gerald Wallace
* Alexis Ajinca
The 1st rounder would probably have to be the Heat pick (if the Wolves keep their own top pick) or a future 1st. At this point, I'd do it. It also allows for the it's-going-to-happen-anyway Mike Miller trade to go through. Of course, Peter is spot-on with his comment about the Wolves bringing out the flaws in everybody's game so any new addition to the team would probably be screwed up within a matter of games after coming here. I've heard that if players sneeze without covering their mouth they get yanked by Witt.
SnP, you always provide great comments, so I was disappointed in the racist "white-out" discussion. This has been cropping up on lots of message boards, and I find it offensive. How would it be perceived if a poster complained that Joe Dumars was constructing a team that was "too black"?
SnP-
I'm actually a little bit intrigued by Morrison, just because of how dominant he was in college and how his career has clearly been slowed by that injury, last season. If he was a "throw-in" to a deal, it would be nice.
We'll see what happens...but there can't be much doubt that McCants is out the door. It's just not working out, this year. I hope he gets traded to a decent team, because I'd thoroughly enjoy watching him in the playoffs...he's one of the more interesting Timberwolves we've ever had--even if not one of the best.
Anon,
I, regretably, have brought up issues of race oon this board in the past because its something I feel strongly about and something I know S&P does as well. It always tends to lead to a heated discussion and rarely is anything resolved.
But, whenever I did bring these issues up I identified myself. If your going to take SnP to task you should at least tell us who you are.
Personally, I didn't find SnP comment offensive, although I didn't find it very humorous either.
Race relations in the NBA, as elsewhere in life, is a topic that can easily careen off the skids. That said, I generally trust the identified commenters to keep it reined in, as they have proven themselves in the past. As I have stated before, however, anonymous commenters have no credibility here. The comment was germane and legitimate, but not worthy of response or discussion if no one knows who is making it.
How can anyone throw legitimate criticism on Shaddy's play this season?
The guy isn't even getting minutes, and gets yanked as soon as he makes a mistake. There have been so many games over McCants brief Wolves tenure where he has clearly been the best player on the floor.
Is he maddeningly inconsistent? Yes. But, he's also extremely talented, and exactly the kind of high risk/high reward player that a sorry team like the Wolves should be willing to invest in.
Outside of picking him and giving him solid minutes in his first season, McCants has been relegated to the periphery.
Go ahead and trade him, but be prepared to watch McCants blossom into a very good player when he's given a little respect, some regular minutes, and a decent coach to teach him.
It's going to be Chauncey Billups all over again. You can take that to the bank.
OK, I'll bite. I think think there is quite a difference between something being "racist" and "racial". I don't think my comment about a 6'8" white out was racist by any stretch of the imagination but I definitely won't shy away from acknowledging that it is racial in nature.
I think the Wolves have used race as a marketing tool in a state where sports fans once complained about Daunte Culpeppers little hands and stupidity. Was he stupid? Did he have little hands? I have no idea but I do know that fans here in Minny seem to respond better to Mike Miller than they do Rashad McCants and I honestly think that this is a part of their decision making process when they choose Player X over Player Y.
I guess I didn't intend it to be funny; rather, a too-close-to-home shot at how stupidly this team makes decisions that fall in line more with marketing than they do on-court production (for a non-racial example, 4th Quarter Foye was a self-created monster that had more to do with selling tickets than anything else). Hell, even their crappy nostalgic ad guy has been whitened up...from Sweetwater Jones to Don Overbeck.
I don't buy the "if the shoe was on the other hand" argument trotted out by anonymous. It's not the same going the other way and it never has been. Is this a double standard? Perhaps, but sometimes double standards are justified.
If we're simply dealing with the marketing aspect of it all, I'm not so sure that singling out race is even a bad thing. If you go back and read some of the Memphis blogs after the Love/Mayo trade one of the things that was brought up was that Mayo will relate to Memphis fans much better than would have Love due to the city's large black population. 3 Shades of Blue had a post that featured this point. I worked in advertising for a while and I can tell you that you take things like this into consideration. Look at how Sprite markets itself in big cities compared to rural Oklahoma. As long as you aren't playing on stereotypes it's simply a matter of targeting a product to as big of an audience as possible.
I'm not going to apologize for making what I thought was a satirical comment about how McHale makes front office decisions. I'm not a big stickler for not responding to anonymous comments but I know Britt is and this is his place so this is the last time I'll respond to an anonymous commenter on this subject. I am doing so because I think it is a valid and relevant point and because I think it would be an interesting discussion that doesn't have to be walked around like it was a bunch of egg shells. I think the Wolves allow marketing decisions to affect their personnel decisions in a negative fashion. Sometimes these are racial in nature. I sincerely believe that if the Wolves could run out a lineup of 5 Midwestern white guys with big smiles they would.
How about this trade:
Mike Miller for Chris Kaman
Clippers clear their front court issues by jettisoning the player that least compliments Zach Randolph. This leaves them a Randolph/Camby front court along with a stop-gap shooting guard until Eric Gordon is ready to take over.
The Wolves add a center who would compliment Al perfectly. They would lose cap space for the magical summer of 2010, but honestly who is going to come to MN when other more enticing teams (NYK & MIA) will have cap space.
The other issue would be that the team would be left without a serviceable starting 2 guard. I say that the season should be geared toward growth and not results. We could start Brewer next to Gomes with Foye/McCants resting Corey. Then the focus should be toward the draft. We would need to evaluate if Foye is capable of the point or if he would be better suited at the off guard position. The draft would then be geared to fill which ever spot Foye doesn't get.
Neither of these line-ups look enticing?
PG: Foye
SG: Demar DeRozan/Tyreke Evans
SF: Brewer
PF: Jefferson
C: Kaman
PG: Ricky Rubio/Brandon Jennings
SG: Foye
SF: Brewer
PF: Jefferson
C: Kaman
Brewer is out for the season with an ACL tear. That continues an unfortunate trend of recent Wolves' lotto picks missing most of an entire season with a big injury. I guess Gomes can expect 35+ minutes per night.
Love your writing Britt.
Regarding ShaddyLove's comments above.....
You got this one right on the money!!
It would be a big mistake to give McCants away. He is just what we need in a two guard. Who else can put the ball on the floor and get to the line on this team. He can shoot and do it all yet he seemingly gets no respect from the organization that drafted him. The front office knew who he was when they drafted him.
No, I don't agree with some of his antics on the floor but he should have been given every opportunity to be the starting 2 guard that they drafted him to be! But no. He has been in Wittman's dog house ever since 10 games in to last season. He then averaged 16 points in 25 minutes a night. Wittman had him out there late in the fourth quarter all the time, yet he is not good enough to start and play 35 minutes a night.
We all know what some of McCants problems are. In my opinion Wittman has handled him very poorly. It is obvious to meet why McCants lashes out. He feels he is not getting the respect from the organization to be the player he knows he can become.
Look, I wanted us to choose Danny Granger in that draft, but the more I saw McCants the more I liked him. Next to Jefferson he is the most talented guy on the team. You can't afford to lose that.
Which brings me to a more important question, why is it that the front office drafts players who are not the right fit for the current coach?
McCants is not the problem, Randy Wittman is!
Your Kool-Aid Du Jour:
I suppose his opinion should have some merit, since he's Coach and all, entitled to his own opinion. Stats from the last four games show us :
In 7:37 vs DEN, starters were +3 (-1 2nd half).
In 7:15 vs OKC, starters were +0 (DNP 2nd half).
In 9:11 vs PHO, starters were -5 (-2 2nd half)
In 8:22 vs DET, starters were +2 (+4 in 2nd half).
(source, www.popcornmachine.net)
And overall, from http://www.82games.com/0809/0809MIN2.HTM
we see that in 89 minutes of play together, the lineup of Foye, Miller, Gomes, Jefferson, & Collins are -9, score less than a point per possession, and win 50% of the time.
Though hardly world-beating, I guess I'll have to admit that I "kinda like" it too. This is mostly because I see Miller and Gomes as a synergistic duo and that Jefferson isn't playing the "5". Also, without a genuine threat from PG, Brewer's lack of offense prowess makes me leery of starting him.
Now personally, I believe that with the Miller-Gomes-Jefferson triumvirate at 2/3/4, Telfair would be the better option at PG. I find it interesting, though, that this combo got slammed (-7 in 5 minutes) to start the Nov 16th Denver game -- and that Telfair hasn't played a single minute with Collins since.
The last time a Wolves first rounder played a full second season William Jefferson Clinton was our nation's president. That's Wally, who started his second season in October 2000.
Since then, we have ended up with Ndudi (2), Shaddy (37) , Randy (39) and Corey (15), none of whom played even half the games in their sophomore years. So, in the eight years of the Bush Administration, Wolves first rounders have played fewer than 100 games in their "pivotal" sophomore seasons.
Gomes has a chance to take his career to the next level. Here's hoping he rises to the occasion.
I noticed a few things while watching the games this holiday weekend.
1. Maybe it's just the wolves horrible defense, but Russell Westbrook looks to be much better (in the future) than Randy Foye ever will be. He's still green, but I was impressed by his ability to finish at the basket and how he uses his athleticism around the rim. Foye just doesn't have the juice to finish well in traffic. If Westbrook learns to shoot, he should be pretty solid.
2. I can't believe we had to double team Chris Wilcox. Big Al seemed to be matching him at the other end, but c'mon, double team Chris Wilcox! Sadly (for them), the Thunder still couldn't win the game.
3. Although Foye is playing better, he still makes a few lazy entry passes each game. This passes are usually picked off or swatted out of bounds. In the Denver game he tried a cross court bounce pass that sailed out of bounds.
4. I wonder if brewer was hurt when he stepped on that Denver player's foot or when he landed awkwardly after the bad pass (by Foye?)?
5. Was anyone else happy for K. Love when a few of his tip in finally went in the basket? I know that's a skill, but he seems cursed with some bad luck recently as well. Hopefully he can hit some perimeter jumpers and open up his game.
Is it wrong to be a bigger fan of this blog than of the team itself?
The most frustrating part of this team is the front court personnel. I know its been said before and better but what this team needs is a legit center that can play heavy minutes next to AlJeff. All the good teams in the league seem to have at least two or three 7footers. Smallball may have been pretty sexy two or three years ago but it doesn't translate into championships. Unless Kevin Love starts popping hormone pills like they're skittles or the team brings back Kevin Harlan, this team is hopeless.
I suggest we all just give up and start rooting for the Blazers. Easily the most fun team to watch this year. And they got four 7footers. Some GMs just get it.
Geez, what a bummer for Corey.
And for us. He was one of the few entertaining bright spots on this team.
I guess now we'll see about Wittman's coaching character. If McCants stays on the bench for awhile, I say give Witt at least one thumb up. I haven't seen Rashad's game change one little bit since he came here. If McCants is incapable, emotionally or whatever, of doing the things Wittman seems to be asking for (demanding?) then the pine is the place for Rashad. I'm not saying that Wittman is either "right" or "wrong", but the onus is on McCants.
Baseball:
Warning Track Power by Alex Halsted
Sports:
On the Ball by Britt Robson
Weather:
Dude Weather by Jimmy Gaines
Fiction:
Write Now! by Terry Faust
Hockey:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Style:
Hook & Eye
Misc:
Is This News?
Fiction:
Yo, Ivanhoe by Brad Zellar
Food:
Consider the Egg by Stephanie March
Wine:
Beyond the Cask
Food:
Food Fight!
Media:
To the Slaughter
Misc:
Outrage by Staff
Food:
Chef's Table
Guest Commentary:
Just Passing Through
Humor:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Cars:
Road Rake by Chris Birt
Commentary:
Read Menace by Tom Bartel
Society:
The Adventures of Melinda by Melinda Jacobs
Politics:
Defenestrator by Rich Goldsmith
Food:
Breaking Bread by Jeremy Iggers & Ann Bauer
Books:
Cracking Spines by Max Ross
Music:
Hear, Hear by Staff
Art:
The Vicious Circle by 6 Critics
Secrets:
Secrets of the Day by Kate Iverson
Theater:
Seen in the City by Staff
Film:
Talk About Talkies by Staff