Dude Weather Subscribe to Secrets Minneapolis / St. Paul

On the Ball

Childress Betrays Jackson....Again

Share

Well, things are getting really nasty now, aren't they?

Today, Minnesota Vikings head coach Brad Childress demoted his quarterback, Tarvaris Jackson, opting instead to start 15-year veteran Gus Frerotte against Carolina on Sunday. Okay, two games is a little bit of a quick hook, but Childress had hinted this might occur earlier this week. The move is neither indefensible nor unexpected.

But the story here isn't the decision but the ungracious manner in which it was made--the vigorish Childress added to the act, the turns of the knife the coach deployed. You see, Childress wanted to make clear that this wasn't a temporary demotion this year--barring injury, he is naming Frerotte the starter for the rest of the season. Then there were the scapegoating comments that are attributed to Childress on ESPN and other sites (I wasn't at the press conference).

"I'm just not seeing right now the aggressiveness from Tarvaris that I saw throughout the off season, training camp, the two preseason games he played in. And part of that may be experience," Childress said. Later he added, "I know there's many other plays, there's a lot of other people that have to step up. But when you go back through and look at the tape, and most importantly be able to sit across from the young man and want to be able to verify what you're feeling--it's kind of like looking in your kid's eyes and saying one [thing] and feeling another."

Got that? Brad Childress just told us that he stared into the eyes of his prized quarterback and found him wanting. This is the same Childress who has been bum-rushing this unprepared kid almost from the moment he plucked him out of a Division II college. It was Childress, against all logic and reason, who anointed T-Jack to be the Vikings field general during the final two games of his rookie season. It was Childress who ignored the obvious, that Jackson was the weak link on a team that might well have qualified for the playoffs last season, Jackson's second year in the league, if they'd had a more experienced and capable play-caller. It was Childress who resisted the need to go out and get a starter-caliber QB to complete what would then be a roster capable of contending for a Super Bowl. And now that Jackson has predictably come up short, Childress is trying to spin it as Jackson somehow making a significant regression in his "aggressiveness" and showing through his eyes, the proverbial "windows to his soul," that he's missing some key ingredient that compels Childress to pull the plug. What a despicable machination on the part of the head coach.

Little more than a week ago, I wrote that if the Vikings underachieve due to Jackson's lack of talent or readiness, "it won't be Tarvaris Jackson's fault--the dude is doing the best he can." Who doubts this? Who doubts that T-Jack is far less culpable for this wretched situation than the coach who grossly overestimated his readiness, his upside, while arrogantly believing that he could mold Jackson like "a piece of clay" in a manner similar to the way he supposedly molded Donovan McNabb?

What we didn't hear today is Childress admit he was wrong and apologize both to his quarterback and to Vikings fans for his colossal misjudgment. Instead, the coach likened Jackson to his own child--and then fucked with his confidence and psyche by scapegoating his lack of aggression.

The motivation for this is obvious: Childress himself is on the hot seat. Ownership has gone out and gotten him a boatload of quality players. The combined ability on the Vikings' offensive and defensive lines is matched or exceeded by at most one or two other teams. Running back Adrian Peterson is arguably the best in the NFL, and certainly among the top three or four. And tens of millions of dollars were spent on free agent receiver Bernard Berrian. But at the all-important quarterback spot, Childress was steadfast in sticking with the inexperienced, outclassed Jackson.

Now that that strategy has predictably blown up in his face, Childress not only demotes Jackson, he crushes him. It is certainly not implausible that Frerotte will get injured during the next 14 games--the guy is 37 years old and not very mobile. So if it comes to pass that Frerotte is being helped to sidelines and Childress turns to Jackson to bail him out, I hope the young QB has cleared his head enough to know that his NFL seasoning has been ass-backward from the start. And if he's able to come through for this team for a game or two, let's remember that he overcame rather than was enabled by his head coach.

In the meantime, with this talented roster, Childress has got to at least get to the playoffs to hold his job. And now, thanks to his earlier misjudgments, he must do it with an aging quarterback who has been a backup more often than he's started (especially the past two years) and has a career quarterback rating of 74.3. Through the first two games of this year, T-Jack's rating is 70.8.

The pink slip that is coming to Brad Childress in the not too distant future will be poetic justice.

17 Reader Comments

Andy G (not verified)04:57pm
Sep 17
Good points. Chilly needs to separate himself from T-Jack in order to have a chance to save his job. The interesting scenario will be if we win 10 or 11 games with Gus, and need to pick a QB next year--with Chilly still coaching. This is a random tangent on Viking fans, but I get tired of the non-stop booing at games. I realize that it's pro sports and fans pay big money to have the right to yell whatever they want, but my one and only Metrodome experience for a Viking game taught me a lot about our fans. They booed almost the entire first half at the coach, defense, offensive line and special teams. I was near the players' tunnel at halftime, when they screamed endless insults at whatever faces they could find. Which game was it? The 35-17 win over AFC Runner-Up Chargers that included a record-breaking performance by Adrian Peterson. I guess we set the bar pretty high here in Minnesota. Strangely, I've been to many TWolves games and heard far-less booing, with far worse teams.
Collin (not verified)08:36pm
Sep 17
I remember the Chargers returning a field goal about 109 yards right before the half time of that game. I remember thinking before they attempted that sixty yard field goal how stupidly risky such a field goal attempt would be. They had about a one out of four chance at three points and the defense had a good chance to block the field goal and return it for seven. Instead of the field goal being blocked, they missed the field goal, the kicking team assumed the play was over, and the chargers got seven points. When they won that game despite the crushing blow right before half time, I took it as a good omen. So many people claim the chargers are the most talented team in the league, and out talent beat there talent despite bad decisions. Still, I can understand fans being a bit upset during half time. The coach made a terrible decision and the players looked(looked not were) lazy and unfocused as the charger returned the field goal 109 yards. Even after taking so much space to explain how I can understand the fans displeasure, I have to say you're right, the viking's fan base is poisonously negative. This is especially bugs me when it comes to their treatment of Tarvarvis Jackson. Watching a game with other fans, every bad thing that happens on offense gets blamed on Jackson when so many other players are overmatched or screwing up on that side of the ball. A replacement left tackle coupled with the league's worst right tackle and a group of receivers dropping a lot of balls make it very hard for Jackson to succeed, especially on third and long when he could really use two good tackles. Jackson is being asked to do a lot of very hard things in high pressure situations and viking's fans think their grandma could do better. All of this brings my mind back to Childress's comment on Jackson being a lump of clay, an athletic tabula rasa. Childress is molding this piece of clay with all the artfulness of a kindergartener. All of the time Childress spent learning about behavioralism, conditioning, and shaping while earning his pysch major apparently went wasted. Putting a young quarterback in a situation where he almost only throws when the defense knows he will be throwing and the defensive ends have very favorable matchups is a good way to teach him helplessness. He gets pummelled and the crowd boos him every time he goes out to make a throw. No wonder he looks discouraged when childress looks into his eyes.
Andy G (not verified)09:02pm
Sep 17
That was a terrible ending to the first half, but I was just pointing out that our fans go absolutely apeshit when a bad play or two happens--even in a game that ends up with 296 yards from one player and a 35-17 win over a great team. I had never been to a regular season Vikes game before, and didn't realize that we abandon our team at the first sign of a struggle, only to start cheering again when Peterson breaks a few long runs. It's pretty embarrassing. Green Bay fans don't do it. Minnesota Twins, Wild and Timberwolves fans don't do it. I don't really understand it, and if I were T-Jack, I would have a couple middle fingers ready for that time in the future that he actually does play well and the fans decide to cheer.
Collin Trude (not verified)10:37pm
Sep 17
If it makes you feel better, that didn't happen at the two vikings games I've been to, but those both came before we dumped moss. I think you're right though. There's something wrong with vikings fans. There are a lot of fair weather viking fans and the ones that aren't are often very pessimistic. They were booing when the vikings were up 15 nothing against the colts. Sure, all of those field goals ended up causing the loss, but booing is sort of a mean reaction at that point. They were doing the best they could.
APB (not verified)07:35am
Sep 19
I'm not a big fan of the booing either. I have also been rooting for T-Jack. I agree he was placed in the starting role way too early. But, Vikings fans are way too negative. T-Jack has not performed well and he deserves to be demoted. But, what I hear from vikings fans are comments a long the lines of questioning T-Jacks mental make-up to be a quarterback in the league. Its the same fans who never let up on Dante and called him "dumb." The IQ92 listeners of Tom Bernard who will vote to hand MN to McPain (dang, thats a big leap there, but one that can't be helped). Sorry, but Vikings fans are just plain stupid and, likewise, I feel I am always at my stupidest from noon to three on fall Sunday afternoons.
pagingstanleyroberts (not verified)11:42am
Sep 19
The weird thing is that the fans never learn -- it's never just about the QB. First it was Randall Cunningham. Then Daunte. Then Brad Johnson. Now T-Jack. For me, watching those two games, the problem seemed pretty clear -- pass defense and pass offense are what matter in the NFL, and the Vikings are average to below-average in both areas. On offense, I don't care if he was the best FA WR out there; Bernard Berrian isn't a #1 receiver. The reason that he was available goes to show how little the Bears thought of him, because the great receivers or TEs never see the FA market. A team needs a receiver who can draw double coverage, and the Vikings only have one when Peterson is involved in a pass play. To be fair, I think Sidney Rice could be a very good receiver, but he's in his second year, so it might be a bit early to consider him the answer. On defense, they're built to stop the run but lacking against the pass. They seem really aggressive and fired up when they can attack, but they have enough breakdowns that the opposing team always has at least a couple of first-and-goals. This year, the opposing offense hasn't really driven the length of the field against them; it's always been a big play that's led to having the ball inside the 5. Great defenses don't give up so many big plays. Maybe the fans shouldn't have listened to the hype. When I heard people suggesting they could be Super Bowl-bound, my first thought was, "No." For exactly the reasons stated above. When the playoffs came around, the pass O or the pass D was going to cost them a game.
Stop-n-Pop (not verified)06:04pm
Sep 17
The George Bush of the NFL strikes again. I can't say that I know a lick about football but I think this is what you get when you hire the only guy you interview and he picks a nobody from a second-rate college division as his piece of clay to mold in the manner of a guy on his former team where as an offensive coordinator he didn't even call the plays. I don't think this guy has the first clue how to run a football team, let alone one with a kick-ass offense. How much of this do you think has to do with the impending TV blackout? Anywho, it's nice to see the big team in town exhibit worse personnel/management decisions than the Wolves. I hear enough about the purple through osmosis at work and on the radio to know that people are far more emotionally invested in this product than they are in my team of choice and I can certainly empathize with what it must be like to be faced with seeing a team with an historic talent go to waste because the coaching staff and management can't seem to understand the fatal flaw at the heart of the organization. What is especially interesting to me is that even though I don't know the first thing about football, I can tell you that Gus isn't the answer and Childress has basically fired the only bullet left in his gun. If they lose this week, then what? 0-3 with a road game at Tennessee on the horizon. He obviously can't go back to T-Jack that quickly. To borrow another Bush-based metaphor, Gus is the Surge. It may work as a PR ploy but the facts on the ground remain the same when the guy running the entire show appears to be a boob.
Captain America (not verified)08:34pm
Sep 17
I agree, you don't know much about George Bush either.
Stop-n-Pop (not verified)07:23am
Sep 18
Yep, me and those 73% of Americans who don't approve. Maybe history will save Chilly too.
Captain America (not verified)08:32pm
Sep 17
I see no problem with the decision that was made nor the manner it was handled. Let's be realistic. None of us know with any degree of certitude what coach knows about (1) T-Jack's personality, (2) what is going on with T-Jack's confidence level, and (3) the exact message that coach believes he must deliver to his young quarterback. What we do know is that the coach has been working closely with the young quarterback since he was drafted. We also know that there is a track record for the coach to groom draftees to become NFL capable quarterbacks. So let's climb down off the expert perch a bit and consider that this coach has more at stake than we do in the future of T-Jack and his team.
Jimmy (not verified)10:51pm
Sep 17
Childress has no such track record of grooming QB's. Donovan McNabb was just one QB, and one doesn't make a track record. And McNabb was highly touted out of college, he didn't need to be groomed nearly as much as a kid from a no-name school that nobody had heard about.
Britt Robson11:00pm
Sep 17
CA-- You can count to 1-2-3 all you want, we do indeed know that Childress championed Jackson too early, and foolishly, for more than a year, and used some very blunt and potentially damaging language while pulling a 180 on his support for Jackson this afternoon. Do you care to try and dispute that? What your second paragraph seems to imply is that Childress is "motivating" Jackson in some way that only he, as Jackson's longtime champion, understands. If this turns out to be the case, I'll admit I was wrong, as I most often do when I am wrong. Would that Childress would do the same. No, I don't have nearly as much at stake in the future of the Vikings as Brad Childress. In fact I'm a relatively casual fan of the team. Which makes it all the more damning that I have been fairly consistent in proclaiming that Childress was rushing his QB, that he wasn't ready to lead this team, and that surrounding him with talent comparable to a Super Bowl contender would only dramatize that fact. Childress's statements today seem to confirm my casual view, and rebut his at-ground-zero actions over the past year or so. But just because Childress is making me look smart doesn't mean I fancy myself as an "expert" on the Vikings: That's your sarcastic word, not mine. As for your first graph, the most obvious "problem" is that the decision had to be made in the first place. You can take the pro-Childress blinkers off long enough to see that, can't you?
Levi (not verified)07:17pm
Sep 20
Aw heck, Captain, I was with you till the 3rd paragraph. Track record w/QBs? Um, not so much. Expert perch? Dayummn. C`mon. Britt calls it as he see it. As I read this article, I was wondering if Britt would ever be alowed into Winter Park again(?) or even the Dome. Bottom line: Childress ain't got enough "people skills" to "Get'R Done". This is just the latest episode. That Britt calls him on it and exposes Chilly's foolishness with a few well chosen facts, well, that's what Britt does -- "booster/homer-isms" be damned. And how will this move turn out in the short term (this season)? You get one guess...OK, yep, you win, Gus Ferottte got SId Hartman's full blessing. That *IS* the Kiss Of Death. Size up the body bags. It's gonna get ugly...because Sid is the Angel of futility.
sternmat (not verified)03:24pm
Sep 18
I was at the Colts game last weekend and I felt the booing was justified as fans expressing their feelings about how the team was going about running its offense. I think most of us felt that you couldn't beat the colts by settling for field goals. Mostly, as Britt points out, fans were upset because the playcalling was abysmal and the execution just as bad. I think we had a right to boo after they managed to execute a good play call and had VS wide open in the end zone and he dropped it. And on the subsequent drives when overly conservative or just boneheaded playcalling (a Jackson naked bootleg after a failed quarterback draw the play before?) resulted in wasted opportunities. Vikes fans may be fair weather, but no more so than other NFL fans when their team has been hyped as a SB contender and they are about to go 0-2 and are going about losing the same why they did it all last year: unimagitive playcalling, an overmatched QB, no production from the WRs, a TE who got big bucks for no reason and can't catch the ball, and a defense that consistently gives up big passing plays. And having been to Bears, Giants and Jets home games in recent years, the booing Minnesotans do is nothing compared to those places. Personally, I think the jury is still out on Childress, while I think there is more than enough evidence as to the competence of GB. On a happier note, Britt, did you attend the festivities at Target Center today? As a season ticket holder since the wolves inception, I was there but only for the first half. It was fun to see Pooh Richardson highlights and JR's winning dunk again. Ah, 20 years of excellence! But Randy brewer was the best they could do as a legend from the wolves past? The Big Brown Bear wasn't available? Or how about some of the international legends, like Gibert, Stoiko and Brooks? We really were on the forefront of the globalization of the NBA, weren't we? They didn't mention that, for some reason. . .
sternmat (not verified)03:26pm
Sep 18
Oops, i meant Shane Heal, not Brooks. Though you can see why I might confuse them.
Jackdaw (not verified)11:02am
Sep 19
I agree completely that Childress' plan of molding Tarvaris into the next Donovan McNabb was doomed from the start. On this demotion, however, personally I suspect that, considering the abruptness with which Childress did his 180, this was an edict handed down from upper management, perhaps even the Zygster himself. I think if Childress had his way we would watch Jackson struggle though all 16 games. Pretty classless of him to throw T-Jack under the bus in his public comments about the switch though, regardless. I suspect we could see Jackson back on the field sooner rather than later, though--considering how immobile Frerotte is and the fact that there will be a scrub at left tackle for a couple more games, there is a good chance he won't even stay healthy through Week 5.
john dough (not verified)11:13am
Sep 19
I agree wholeheartedly with you, Britt. the more I see out of Childress, the less I like him. throwing T-Jack under the bus after week 2 is just pathetic management skills. especially after a second half against Green Bay where he showed a lot of improvement once they started *gulp* using play action pass on first down and lengthening the field. I just don't understand why they keep sticking to West Coast principles when we clearly don't have the personnel that fits them. i blame very little on Jackson, at least until they can say they've put him in a position to succeed. and expecting him to "manage the game" by only getting the opportunity to pass on third downs is the farthest thing from that. but i won't be surprised if they trust frerotte more, thus open the playbook from the get-go, and he succeeds.

Blogs

Sports

Baseball:
Warning Track Power by Alex Halsted
Sports:
On the Ball by Britt Robson

Society

Weather:
Dude Weather by Jimmy Gaines

A&E

Fiction:
Write Now! by Terry Faust

Retired

Hockey:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Style:
Hook & Eye
Misc:
Is This News?
Fiction:
Yo, Ivanhoe by Brad Zellar
Food:
Consider the Egg by Stephanie March
Wine:
Beyond the Cask
Food:
Food Fight!
Media:
To the Slaughter
Misc:
Outrage by Staff
Food:
Chef's Table
Guest Commentary:
Just Passing Through
Humor:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Cars:
Road Rake by Chris Birt
Commentary:
Read Menace by Tom Bartel
Society:
The Adventures of Melinda by Melinda Jacobs
Politics:
Defenestrator by Rich Goldsmith
Food:
Breaking Bread by Jeremy Iggers & Ann Bauer
Books:
Cracking Spines by Max Ross
Music:
Hear, Hear by Staff
Art:
The Vicious Circle by 6 Critics
Secrets:
Secrets of the Day by Kate Iverson
Theater:
Seen in the City by Staff
Film:
Talk About Talkies by Staff