Dude Weather Subscribe to Secrets Minneapolis / St. Paul

On the Ball

The Black Mamba Finally Gets His Moment

Share

Well, now we know the reason behind Kobe Bryant's curiously fitful and misguided play during the first seven games of the Olympic tournament: An absence of pressure. Nearly universally (and accurately) regarded as the best clutch shooter in the game today, Kobe's commanding crunchtime aplomb was a superfluous virtue as the USA men ran roughshod over the best the rest of the world had to offer. The average margin of victory had been well over 20 points per game, boosted by a 37-point pasting of Spain in their previous matchup just last week.

But with 8:13 to play in the final period of the Gold Medal Game in the wee Sunday morning hours here in the States, the Spainards flash-flooded the notion of Everything To Lose in the minds of the so-called Redeem Team with a 7-0 run that had them down by a bucket, 91-89. Although nearly every player on the USA roster was "The Man" for their respective ballclubs in similar situations back home, this was alien pressure, both for its novelty in this tournament and the enormous stakes involved. If there was one performer whose entire alpha persona thrived on such moments it was Kobe, the self-described Black Mamba, who could simultaneously poison the hopes and suffocate the competitive fire of his opponents. He didn't disappoint; indeed, it was obviously the moment for which he had been impatiently waiting.

As the somewhat rattled USA squad came back on to the court after a timeout, Kobe had up to that point lodged a fairly typical Olympic game for his tournament: He was shooting just 3-9 from the field, owing in part to his inaccuracy from long range--he had clanked four of his five shots from beyond the arc. He had yet to go to the foul line.

No matter. The next 2:11--131 seconds--belonged to Kobe, and decided this tournament. First he nailed a two-pointer to halt Spain's run and give the USA some crucial breathing space. Next time down the court, he drew the defenders toward him and fed Deron Williams for a trey; the possession after that he penetrated and dished to Dwight Howard for a slam. At the other end, he and his teammates had harrassed hot shooter Rudy Fernandez into three straight misses, that would be broken when Fernandez sank a trey after an offensive rebound of his last misfire. Kobe answered that with a three-pointer of his own. Bang. Just like that it was 101-92 with 6:02 to play--enough room for Kobe's teammates to relax into their own prodigiously talented games.

Comparisons to Michael Jordan have become hackneyed, not to mention unfair, for NBA players over the past decade--it is like anointing a singer-songwriter the next Dylan or a reggae artist the next Marley. But there is one trait Kobe possesses that involuntarily brings up memories of MJ--an almost maniacal need to be the straw that stirs the drink when the game is on the line. There are other sublime clutch shooters--Manu Ginobili comes to mind. But Ginobili--or Robert Horry, or even LeBron James--won't engage in a bloodthirsty fight to seize the right to be either hero or goat. (Yes, I know there have been times when Kobe has "disappeared" in big games. But even then, it seemed as if he was ostentatiously proving a point about his value to the team by withdrawing his aggression. Thankfully those days seem to be over.)

To its credit, Spain wouldn't give up, clawing to within 5, at 104-99, with 3:34 to play. Twenty-two seconds later, Kobe thrust in the first dagger, sinking another three-pointer while simultaneously drawing the disqualifying foul on Fernandez, Spain's leading scorer with 22 points in 18 minutes. Although the 4 point play built the lead back to 8, Spain was again within 4 with 2:08 to go when Dwyane Wade canned a trey, for the second dagger into the reeling bull. After a Juan Carlos Navarro free throw, Kobe provided the third and fatal blow, a layup that pushed the lead back to 8 with 72 seconds left. A pair of meaningless free throws gave Kobe 13 points in the final 8:13, along with those two huge assists--one outside to D-Will, the other inside to Howard.

The best player of this Olympics for the USA was clearly LeBron, who did everything as a Superglue guy. LeBron's foul trouble early in the game created a horrible defensive tone for USA, because, as commentator Doug Collins (who had an excellent Olympics himself) pointed out, the weakside help on the Spanish bigs simply wasn't large or fast enough to deter them the way only LeBron could. Down the stretch, LeBron played with four fouls while battling the water buffalo Marc Gasol for position in the paint. This was far from his best game, but when you gleaned the stat sheet, there he was, with 14 points on 6-9 FG (2-3 3pt, 0-2 FT), 6 rebounds (second to Chris Bosh's 7), and three apiece in assists, steals and turnovers. Looking back on their rookie years, does anyone else recall how much Charles Barkley and others were touting LeBron and Melo Anthony as equals?

It's been said before by many others, but the biggest surprise of this tournament for the USA was how big Chris Bosh played underneath, without losing his ability to show hard toward the perimeter on pick and rolls. Bosh's court intelligence was especially impressive: More than any of his teammates he seemed to adapt and thrive in the international game. Maybe practicing all year with Spainards Jose Calderon and Juan Carlos Navarro [correction: Calderon and Argentinian Carlos Delfino; Navarro was in Memphis] in Toronto with the Raptors had an effect. The other pleasant surprise was the rejuvenation of Dwyane Wade, who led all scorers in the Gold Medal Game with 27, and was invaluable in maintaining the USA lead when both LeBron and Kobe were shelved with foul trouble. Wade also typified the USA's ball-hawking, transition-oriented style, and was one of the precious few able to maintain that rhythm against Spain, with 4 steals. Anyone who loves the aesthetic pleasure of NBA athletes is thrilled to see him back in vintage form. I would place him second only to LeBron in overall effectiveness for these Olympics.

While Chris Paul was money from the free throw line, did anyone else think the pressure got to him a bit today? Both Argentina and Spain deployed their zones on Paul as much as on Jason Kidd, inviting both to shoot. Kidd's questionably accuracy made the strategy unsurprising, but the international three-point line is well within Paul's range. While Paul wanted the ball in his hands when free throws would ice the game, he looked far less self-assured in those second-half moments when Spain was within a possession or two of the lead. And Paul's defense was shoddy in the Gold Medal Game.

On the other side of the ball, as good as Pau Gasol was, with 21 points on 9-18 FG, six rebounds and just one turnover, did anyone else hope it was up to him to put Spain over the top at crunchtime. Between Gasol and Lamar Odom, Laker fans better hope that Andrew Bynum has been sufficiently toughened by Kobe criticism to emerge as a legit crunchtime sidekick, or there could be volcanic emotional displays in the playoffs ahead.

Felipe Reyes is a mucker supreme, an absolutely invaluable commodity on the basketball court--I'm surprised the Spurs haven't heavily pursued him, although I hear he makes a boatload of money in the Euro league. But the teenage point guard, Ricky Rubio, is going to be an NBA starter within the next three years. His entire game screams NBA, and after a shaky first tilt versus the USA, his play today, especially his on-ball defense, was much improved.

Bottom line, these Olympics were a great diversion for hoops fans waiting on the opening of NBA training camps. And the opening of the regular season is less than ten weeks away.

24 Reader Comments

Golden Armor (not verified)04:17pm
Aug 24
This is pretty much a spot-on summary of Team USA's performance in Beijing.
Anonymous (not verified)10:37pm
Aug 24
lol ... im from Toronto ... and Juan Caros Navarro ... never played for the Raptors ... Maybe youre talking about Jorge Garbosa .... Either way ... that is POOR REPORTING
gundars vetra (not verified)12:02am
Aug 25
it's garbajosa...and that's just poor commenting.
Britt Robson12:44am
Aug 25
He also spelled Carlos wrong, but all the belittling doesn't change the fact that he's right. Actually it wasn't Garbajosa who I was thinking of, but another international player who, like Navarro, has decided to forego the NBA next year and has a Carlos in his name, but did play for the Raps last season--Carlos Delfino. My apologies for the error, which will be cited in the text above.
Anonymous (not verified)09:55am
Aug 25
Ya ... it was poor spelling in my comment earlier ... but I dont care ... im not the one writing a news article ... anyways ... thanks for being man enough to correct a mistake .... Question ... do the press in the USA actually follow the Raps at all? Because you are not the first one to have made a mistake similar to this one ..... and how could you forget about Delfino .... Might have been the Semi Finals MVP in these Olympics ....
Britt Robson10:34am
Aug 25
I'm not the one writing a news article either. If you stick around, you'll notice that the commenters are frequently as erudite as the poster, a standard you haven't maintained. They also identify themselves by a name other than anonymous, which is a cowardly handle that deliberately obscures your identity. A third posting under anonymous will wipe out this whole exchange. And I obviously didn't forget about Delfino, I just mistakenly called him by another name.
Captain America (not verified)04:29pm
Aug 24
Whatever happened to the white elephant or the pink rabbit or (beige) Spanish Fly?
Stop-n-Pop (not verified)07:41pm
Aug 24
I think it should be noted that even though it was a losing effort, Spain's performance was the best NBA-style performance from an international team in FIBA history. This is exactly the type of high-level opponent that the Dream Team never had to worry about or get by. To me, this really caps off this team's accomplishments more than anything the 92 squad did. Hats off to Spain: they are clearly the 2nd best team in the world and they played an NBA-style game as close as you can possibly get with with best NBA players in the world. Let's get on with it and get the NBA to adopt FIBA rules. BTW: I think the "Water Buffalo" is the perfect nickname for Marc Gasol...much better than The Tank. Buffalo de aqua. Tourney winners: 1- Chris Bosh- for all the reasons stated above. 2- Lebron- while Kobe had the late game/last game heroics, Lebron cemented his position as the best player in the world. 3- Ricky Rubio's agent- seriously, the kid is going to be the number 1 pick in the draft. I cannot overstate how impressive it was to watch him adapt his game throughout the tourney. He was splitting double teams with D-Will and D-Wade and hitting floaters in the lane. Seriously. WTF?! 4- The Spanish A League- they are producing team loads of NBA ballers. 5- Argentina- they played well for a defending champion. 6- Yao- gutted it out with an injury in front of the home crowd. Classy all the way. Tourney losers: 1- Mark Cuban- ouch. Those are your two best players? Sorry. 2- Melo- why would you build a team around this guy again? 3- Chris Kaman- I could care less about the initial decision but seriously...how about showing up? 4- Dwight Howard- he was absolutely mind-f#$ked in the last 2 games. Argentina came out and hit him in the mouth and the Spaniards got in his head early. Add in some poor free throw shooting and a very, very unpolished offensive game and...well, here's hoping that he finds a way to put it all together. 5- Misty May- how crappy would it be to have Jason Kidd stalking you? 6- NBA rules and regs vis-a-vis FIBA ones- more open play and higher scores. Where can I sign up? Finally, it should also be noted that the women had a fantastic tourney as well. The game against the Aussies was rough and tumble and it was downright nasty at times. The womens' international game is a perfect example of the benefits of basketball's increased globalization. Russian and Italian leagues have produced a ton of good players that all play a similar style of ball and can function competitively in a true FIBA setting. If this game is going to be as big as soccer (and I think it can), they need to standardize the rules. I know I sound like a broken record on this point, but FIBA rules are where it's at. Basketball wasn't quite as lucky as baseball was with guessing the best dimensions from the get-go. The rim is probably too short and too small in diameter and the lane is far too narrow. Let's go at least part of the way towards making it better by moving in the 3 point line and widening the lane.
Andy G (not verified)08:28pm
Aug 24
Great recap of an exciting final game. I think the analysts and reporters are right to applaud Spain in their effort, rather than criticize the US for not winning by more points. While the US defense may not have been at its absolute best in that 2nd Half, the Spaniards passed the ball extremely well, and Rudy Fernandez was hitting shots that were unstoppable by anybody's best defense. Speaking of, Fernandez showed a lot of versatility, some great passing, and a dunk over Dwight Howard. So, he gets to join Greg Oden, LaMarcus Aldridge, Jaryd Bayless and Brandon Roy. So, I guess that sort of sucks for Wolves fans. Dwayne Wade was awesome. He looks like the best athlete in the world when he's playing 100% out there. I still think Miami should've traded Beasley for a slew of veterans. Wade is in his prime right now, and can't afford to wait around in a rebuilding effort. I've only been able to see the 2nd Half of the Gold Medal game...Rubio must have done his damage in the 1st. He didn't do anything (good or bad) in the 2nd, besides dribble a little bit and not get torched on defense. I'm not saying he's not a great prospect--just that he showed nothing in the 2nd Half of the Gold Medal game. I'm sure he looks more productive against more reasonable opposition for a 17-year old. Good to see Kobe step up and close the deal. Without him, they are probably another LeBronze winner--ok kidding, they would have found another way to win if he weren't there. In international play, at age 30, he may not be as valuable as Wade or James. They are younger and more eager (and able) to run the floor. It will be fun to see whether he can adapt to old age, like Jordan did, and master a couple back-to-the-basket moves that don't require as much explosiveness. He's still the best NBA player in the world, though, and it will take more than a handful of FIBA games for him to officially pass the torch off to James.
pagingstanleyroberts (not verified)11:58pm
Aug 24
After this, it makes me wonder how much of this team will be on the next one. I'm assuming that the next team will revert to previous teams where not every All-Star is willing to play. Here's my guess: G - Either Paul or Williams, Wade or Bryant F - Either James or Anthony My assumption is that neither Kidd nor Redd will be invited back. With that in mind, who will be the other 9 players? My guess: G - Derrick Rose/Devin Harris/Mike Conley Jr./Rajon Rondo, Brandon Roy/T-Mac/Joe Johnson, shooter TBD, vet PG TBD F - Kevin Durant or Michael Beasley, Tyson Chandler or Greg Oden, Amare Stoudemire or Howard, 2 from David Lee/Prince/Andre Iguodala/Josh Smith/David West Other thoughts?
Wolf in MO (not verified)09:10am
Aug 25
Sean Deveny had an article on that today www.today.sportingnews.com/sportingnewstoday He actually listed Al Jefferson as one of his top ten for 2012.
pagingstanleyroberts (not verified)11:32am
Aug 25
Some interesting names on there (Chase Budinger?). I think some of those guys' status will depend on how much they progress. For example, Jefferson needs to improve his D, Horford his O, Oden needs to be healthy and productive, and Stuckey needs to have Billups moved so he can show himself as a starter. I was surprised at Stuckey; I think Monta Ellis has a better shot than Stuckey at this point because he's got the starting PG job.
Stop-n-Pop (not verified)09:37am
Aug 25
I know it's kind of homerish and that he hasn't played a minute in the NBA, but if any rookie in the recent draft has a game built for international ball it's Love. Joe Johnson, Kevin Martin, and Brandon Roy should get shots at the guard position. Caron Butler wouldn't be a bad pick either. David West and Chandler should get looks in the frontcourt along with Big Al, Josh Smith and LaMarcus Aldridge. I'm sure guys like Paul, D-Will, Howard, and Lebron will stick around. I like the idea of a guy like David Lee...that's a solid take. I don't like Durrant. I want him as far away from the national team as possible. No chuckers allowed on the national squad. No volume scorers. There's simply not enough shots to go around for guys like Durrant to be successful in international ball...especially since he doesn't do much else but shoot.
Stop-n-Pop (not verified)10:03am
Aug 25
What will be really interesting about the next team is that it will actually be a test of Colangelo's 3-year theory. This team was not about a system or coaching or international play; it was about getting the best 7-8 players in the world to play their asses off for 2 weeks. That's it. It was more of a motivational group trip than it was a basketball exercise. Next time around, the talent might not be there. You may have 5or 6 of the best 7-8 players stay at home. Coach K can motivate all he wants but if you sub out a few of those guys (like Kobe, Wade, and Lebron) from yesterday's final, the US doesn't walk away with gold. That's been the most frustrating thing about this tourney (if there is a frustrating thing): they did it like they've always done it, with the best talent. The "change" has been managerial Tom-Peters-esque talking points for Nike commercials. The bottom line here is that a team with Kobe, Lebron, Wade, Paul, Williams, and Bosh should not lose to anyone in the world. Period. This isn't exactly rocket science. Next time around, they may have to show a bit more in the way of player selection as they may not have the best to pick from.
stop-n-pop (not verified)02:19pm
Aug 25
+/- data for the US team here: http://sonicscentral.com/apbrmetrics/viewtopic.php?t=1871&sid=c98721f28fad285c89f3a6cdc41bfbef
Timby (not verified)06:12pm
Aug 26
Britt, thanks again for the commentary. It was a great diversion during summer, when there is normally a dearth of real NBA news.
Kevin (not verified)08:25am
Aug 28
Kobe's "clutchness" is highly overrated. When has he hit a game winning shot that mattered or stepped up in a game that needed him. Would MJ ever abandon his team as Kobe did in that Western Conference semi-final Game 6 against the Suns three years ago? Would MJ have scored only 22 points in the deciding game of a championship series as Kobe did this past spring? MJ was and is the best clutch performer and player the NBA has ever seen.
Andy G (not verified)11:18am
Aug 28
Kevin, In case you missed these, they might give you some idea why a lot of fans think Kobe is a clutch player. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xoa6Ghh2_80 Oh, and in Game 6 of that series (which was the quarter-final), Kobe had 50 points, 8 rebounds, 5 assists, and 3 steals. Unfortunately, Tim Thomas forced OT with a 3 that came off an offensive rebound. And I don't think it was Kobe who missed the blockout. Phoenix was the 2-seed in that series, had 3 players who made All-NBA teams in or around that season (including MVP of that season, Steve Nash) and was almost beat by a team that started Smush Parker, Luke Walton, Lamar Odom and Kwame Brown. Somehow, I doubt even Jordan would have been up to that task.
pagingstanleyroberts (not verified)01:10pm
Aug 28
First of all, his point was that, when Jordan smelled an opportunity to win, he rarely let it slip through his fingers. In that Game 6, Thomas made the 3 with 6 seconds left. There was plenty of time for Kobe to hit the winner. Did he? No. No matter how good Kobe was in Game 6, he didn't have a great Game 7 and couldn't motivate his teammates to a higher level. The same thing happened in Game 6 of the Celtics series. That never happened to Jordan in his prime; every time his team needed a win, they got it. Also, the Lakers were playing a Phoenix team without Amare Stoudemire. In the two first-round series against Phoenix, Kobe averaged 28/6/5 and 32/5/4 against a team that was built around not caring much about defense. As for Jordan, you might want to check basketball-reference.com before saying that Jordan couldn't do what Kobe did, because he did a similar or more difficult thing in a much more competitive conference. In the '88 first round, his fellow starters were Sam Vincent, Brad Sellers, Charles Oakley, and Dave Corzine. He was facing a Cleveland team featuring All-Stars like Mark Price, Larry Nance, and Brad Daugherty and including guys like Ron Harper and Hot Rod Williams. Jordan averaged 36/7/5 in the playoffs and led the Bulls to the upset. The next year, the Bulls were the 6 seed and Jordan was playing point guard with a 23-year-old Scottie Pippen, a 23-year-old Horace Grant, Bill Cartwright, and Craig Hodges. He led the Bulls to upsets of the 3-seed Cavs and the 2-seed Knicks before losing in 6 to the Pistons in the conference finals. In Game 5 against the Cavs, the one with "The Shot," Jordan gave the Bulls the lead with 6 seconds left. The Cavs got the ball back and re-took the lead with 3 seconds left. Jordan came back and hit the game-winner at the buzzer. That year, Jordan averaged 35/7/8 in the playoffs while playing against two teams that featured multiple All-Stars (Cavs and Pistons) and a team that supposedly wrote the book on how to stop him (Pistons). Jordan's teams in 88-89 were similar to Bryant's teams in 06-07; some would even say that Jordan had less to work with. His teammates were just as young or younger and had just as little talent. Jordan was able to win 3 playoff series in those two years, despite having to play point guard for one year. He also had better numbers than Bryant did. All of that seems pretty convincing that Jordan has had a lot more success as the underdog than Kobe has.
Andy G (not verified)02:13pm
Aug 28
I agree that the stuff in your middle paragraph is really impressive, and that's part of the reason I think Jordan is one of the greatest--and possibly "the" greatest--to ever play the game. Your last paragraph is where things get out of control. Nobody would say Jordan's 88-89 supporting cast was worse than Kobe's 05-06 team. Nobody that watches basketball, at least. Give me Scottie Pippen (at any age after college and before 35) and three bums and and you're going to have a group better than Smush, Walton, Odom and Kwame. Add fellow future All-Star Horace Grant, and it's completely one-sided. Add other solid 7-footer that was way the hell better than Kwame and also made 1 All-Star Game, Bill Cartwright, and now it's getting just completely laughable. Odom is the only guy in Kobe's group that was arguably solid as a starting player, and he's proven to be, possibly, the biggest choke artist in pro ball today. And, in 2006, he averaged less than 15 ppg, so even in the regular season, he wasn't exactly a machine. If you want to make the good argument for Jordan vs. Bryant, point to the 6 titles out of 7 straight post-seasons. That was truly amazing, even if he had a supporting cast that made Game 7 of the East Semis immediately after his first retirement. But don't try to say Pippen and Grant were comparable to Odom and Smush, no matter what their age was.
midlife crisis (not verified)08:18am
Aug 29
The 88 vs 89 teams were completely different, but I don't know how that becomes part of the discussion. Why is Kobe not a clutch player because MJ was more of one? Does that mean nobody is a scorer because they can't match Wilt's 50 ppg for a season. In today's world, I can't think of anyone better to score in the last minute. And don't disparage Odom too much. His head might be messed up, but he has some real skills. He's not arguably solid. The argument with Odom is whether or not he deserves to be an all star. Kobe hasn't had the complete starved for talent teams that KG had for a number of years, but that's what stuck KG in round one. With Bynum, one would expect Kobe will get his shaqless ring pretty quickly. Perhaps not this year, but people will still want to play in LA, and they will shore up their weakness (maybe with PJ Brown 3/4 through the year).
pagingstanleyroberts (not verified)10:30am
Aug 29
Good points. I watched a 23-year-old Scottie Pippen and a 26-year-old Lamar Odom, and I'd take Odom any time. The stats back that up, too; Odom had a better regular season and a much better postseason than Pippen. And you're correct about the changes in the Bulls; Oakley was traded for Cartwright, which moved Grant into the starting lineup. A lot of the guys did stay the same, though; their roles just changed. I think Kobe is probably the most clutch player right now when it comes to making shots with the game on the line. But I've seen him miss game-winners against the Wolves. I've even seen him miss free throws against them with the game on the line. He's not as clutch as Jordan. I think the discussion got off track when we started looking at playoff history, which is really more about who's a better winner. Obviously, that's Jordan. He's so competitive that it's sometimes worked against him (Wizards), but when he could back up his mouth and had good teammates, he had success. The difference between him and Kobe is that Jordan was usually the most resilient player on the floor. He played in an era where defense ruled and teams tried to beat him up, but he still overcame it. The flu game in the '97 finals, the '98 finals where Pippen played through a back injury, the years where he led underdogs to playoff upsets -- that's what sets him apart from Kobe.
Andy G (not verified)10:51am
Aug 29
Replying to MC's comments, Odom has not made an All-Star team, even as an injury substitute, so I wouldn't say he's arguably of that caliber. He's never averaged 18 ppg or 11 rebounds per game. Until you've cheered for the Lakers in a big playoff series, you probably don't fully understand why Odom is not a very good guy to have on your side. Replying to PSR's comments, I too remember times when Kobe has failed to close the deal. It's happened a lot. I guess I just remember MJ failing once in a while, too. Nick Anderson might also remember at least one instance. Didn't Jordan have a commercial where he mentioned how many game winners he missed, basically implying that "at least I'm willing to take that shot" or "I'll make the next one?" Jordan is the better playoff winner. That can't be debated. He played with much better teams, yes, but all it really boils down to is wins and losses. And on your final point, a much bigger difference between Jordan and Kobe is marketing and commercials. They have had a big impact on Jordan's image and people are unwilling to accept that a less-likeable player can challenge him as an all-around great player. Jordan played in an era where "illegal defense" ruled and he was guarded one-on-one for 48 minutes. Kobe can only dream of what that would be like.
Sean (not verified)09:09pm
Sep 6
I'm just wondering where all the people who blasted the wolves for trading the pick that would become Mario Chalmers are now that he got busted smoking pot at the NBA orientation? He really couldn't wait a couple days to get high?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <i> <b> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
By entering in the words in the captcha image, you help us prevent automated spam submissions and keep the site tidy.

Blogs

Sports

Baseball:
Warning Track Power by Alex Halsted
Sports:
On the Ball by Britt Robson

Society

Weather:
Dude Weather by Jimmy Gaines

A&E

Fiction:
Write Now! by Terry Faust

Retired

Hockey:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Style:
Hook & Eye
Misc:
Is This News?
Fiction:
Yo, Ivanhoe by Brad Zellar
Food:
Consider the Egg by Stephanie March
Wine:
Beyond the Cask
Food:
Food Fight!
Media:
To the Slaughter
Misc:
Outrage by Staff
Food:
Chef's Table
Guest Commentary:
Just Passing Through
Humor:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Cars:
Road Rake by Chris Birt
Commentary:
Read Menace by Tom Bartel
Society:
The Adventures of Melinda by Melinda Jacobs
Politics:
Defenestrator by Rich Goldsmith
Food:
Breaking Bread by Jeremy Iggers & Ann Bauer
Books:
Cracking Spines by Max Ross
Music:
Hear, Hear by Staff
Art:
The Vicious Circle by 6 Critics
Secrets:
Secrets of the Day by Kate Iverson
Theater:
Seen in the City by Staff
Film:
Talk About Talkies by Staff