Dude Weather Subscribe to Secrets Minneapolis / St. Paul

On the Ball

The Three Pointer: 5 out of 7

Share

AP Photo, by Tom Olmscheid

Game #67, Home Game #35: Memphis 94, Minnesota 98

Season Record: 17-50

1. Jefferson Dominant

The transformation point of the Wolves' 98-94 win over Memphis last night was when Al Jefferson willed his team back into contention during the first 7 minutes of the third period after an abysmal first half. Smallball didn't work for Minnesota in those two periods--Memphis forwards Gay, Miller, and Warrick racked up 32 points and 16 rebounds while Snyder, Gomes, Brewer and Smith amassed just 10 points and 3 boards--but Jefferson, who had 6 of the Wolves' 15 total rebounds (vs. 32 for the Grizz) in that first half, came out spitting nails. He destroyed Darko Milicic in the paint.

Simply detailing the line gives you a little flavor of this man-among-boys stretch of play. Jefferson's offensive rebound on a Randy Foye miss led to two second-chance points via Ryan Gomes' free throws. Then he got fouled by Rudy Gay and made one of two; cleaned up a Gomes missed layup with a putback slam dunk; hit two more free throws after being fouled by Darko; grabbed a rebound off a Gay miss that eventually led to a Foye bucket; snuffed a Gay layup with a beautiful block; came down and hit a banker in the lane; and then fed Foye for a trey. A grand 3:12 had elapsed, and Jefferson had 7 points, three boards (two on the offensive glass), an assist and a block in keying a 14-2 Wolves run that turned a 14-point halftime deficit into a one-possession game.

You think he was done? In the ensuing 3:29 after the Memphis timeout, he scored 5 more points, grabbed two more offensive rebounds, and scaled the scaffolding with Gay as the latter drove the baseline and attempted to throw it down, turning him back with an above-the-rim block. When Jefferson laid the ball in off a Foye feed with 4:19 to play in the third, the Wolves had their first tie since 0-0, and Jefferson had 12 points, 4-4 FG, 4-6 FT, four offensive rebounds (and 5 overall) and a pair of blocks in less than 7 minutes of play. That's how you make All Star teams and have teammates look at you a little differently in the locker room and at practice.

2. Working The Seams

Let the record show that Randy Foye and Rashad McCants were a combined 11-31 FG last night, and that it doesn't even come close to revealing how well they played, individually and together. The standing cavaet here is that this was the Memphis Grizzlies, not quite as pathetic as the Clippers without Kamen the other night, but certainly earning their new status as one of the three worst teams in the NBA (the Wolves are now 4th, crushing ping pong balled dreams throughout the frozen tundra). But as coach Randy Wittman said in the postgame, Foye and McCants have been told to work the seams of the defense via penetration and then dish to the open man if and when their path to the hoop is deterred. Both players did that last night, often feeding each other, and the only concern is that they weren't finishing each other's assists. As it was, Shaddy had five dimes (it could have been 8-10) and Foye 3 (could have been double that), even with Craig Smith agains enduring a loud and mysterious 1-7 FG clanking.

Foye's numbers weren't even as good as McCants's mediocrity, but for all the times I've ripped him for generating results while looking like anything but a point guard, tonight is payback: Despite the numbers, his floor game lent credence to the idea that he can run this ballclub in the half court. My one criticism is that it is a little too noticeable how much Foye suddenly changes personality and looks more for his A) when Jefferson isn't in the game and B) in the 4th quarter. I think both situations warrant more scoring aggressiveness; I just wish it wasn't so easy for a scout to write this tendency in his report and have it come true.

But here's the deal: Wittman sits his stud Jefferson with 1:59 to play in the 3rd, and sits Foye with 25 seconds to go in the third. The Wolves head into the final period with that pair on the pine, and down six points, 62-68. Time for Rashad McCants to screw seam-working and get his own; and lest there be any doubt, Wittman throws the clanking Gators, Brewer and Richard, out there along with a stone cold Craig Smith and Marko Jaric. So 16 seconds in, Shaddy nails a 12-foot pull-up. He sinks the T on Memphis's defensive 3-seconds. He cans a 20-footer on a feed from Jaric. And then flips in a layup on a dish from Smith. It's McCants 7, Memphis 2 in 3:02 of the 4th. Timeout Grizzlies at 69-70, with Jefferson and Foye soon to come back fresh. By the time they are both good to go, at 6:31, Minnesota is down 4. But McCants erases Memphis's last lead by getting back to seamwork, finding Foye for trey to cut the deficit from 4 to 1 and then dishing to Jefferson for a six-foot hook that puts the Wolves up for good. For the 4rh quarter, Shaddy is an ugly 3-10 FG--on paper. On the court he was the crunchtime linchpin, with 9 points, 3 dimes, 2 boards and plus +10 for the period. And Foye has an efficient 7 points in 6:31 (2-2 FG, 2-2 FT, 0 assists but 0 turnovers) and is plus +6.

3. Hit and Run

It sure would be fattening to play the Grizz every night. The "tanking" concept is way overused lately, so let's just say it was a curious decision for Grizz coach Mark Iavaroni to go with the Not Ready For Prime Time Player Mike Conley at the point instead of the far more polished Kyle Lowry down the stretch. And, after Jason Collins snagged his 5th foul, to toss clueless Kwame Brown in as red meat for Jefferson when Memphis was up by just two points with 7:07 to go in the game and Brown hadn't seen one second of burn up to that point. Are we surprised that Jefferson scored five points and drew two fouls on Brown during the latter's 2:34 of play, a stretch that saw the Wolves go on an 8-4 run? And let's not forget Juan Carlos Navarro, whose shot selection had Gerald Green holding his head and running around in circles in his living room watching the game at home. Navarro's 0-4 FG in 3:31 went nicely with Conley's 3--7 FG in all 12:00--neither one had an assist.

For the game, Navarro was 5-17 FG, Conley 3-10 FG--that's a flatulant 8-17 FG out of your starting backcourt, folks--*with zippo, nada, zilch, assists. The guys spooling out all the dimes for this Grizz squad? Darko and Kahim Warrick, with 3 apiece. Meanwhile, Rudy Gay and Mike Miller, so effective in the first half, combined for 6-17 FG in the second half--because no one could get them the damn ball in any position to score. That little chime you heard when Jason Collins scored on a wide open layup after a feed from Warrick with 9:32 to play in the 4th quarter was the signal that Memphis had used up its allotted one assist for the entire second half. They would not be granted another--not with Conley and Navarro in the backcourt.

Before we go, two quick shout-outs. Ryan Gomes suffered through a terrible shooting performance--and because Gomes pretty much only shoots open looks, you know he's off when he's 1-11 FG. But in the final 70 seconds of play with the Wolves up by one, there was Gomes with a savvy strip-and-save of a Memphis dribble penetration to produce the steal, then a no-hesitation swish on a wide open 20-footer to give Minnesota a little cushion. Big shot, which shores up one of the few places where Gomes hasn't been reliable this season, clutch scoring.

Finally, it would be a shame to overlook another guerrilla-effective performance from Jaric, who merely led the team in assists (7) and plus/minus (+9) in 31:01. That's a very Telfair-like 31 assists and 6 turnovers for Marko in the last 5 games. At my prompting, Wittman admitted he thought about getting Jaric more burn in the final 6 and a half minutes in place of Kirk Snyder--"but I was afraid of Rudy Gay's size at the 3; I didn't want him getting inside" creating switches and open looks for him and others, he replied.

Except that his dunderheaded teammates plus Jefferson's commitment to protecting the rim stopped Gay far more than Snyder, who seemed overmatched most of the evening. But yet another way to look at it is that Wittman played a 24-year old newbie (Snyder) over the established commodity (Jaric) and found out a little more about this soon-to-be unrestricted free agent. Wittman's take on Snyder? "Solid. He does everything decent. He's worked himself into my confidence at the end of games." Meanwhile, Corey Brewer and Chris Richard can trade nostalgic memories of March Madness on the sideline...

23 Reader Comments

A.K. Agikamik (not verified)04:04pm
Mar 20
The first half left such a bad taste in my mouth that I was shocked to look up at the corner stat board at game's end and see 21 assists and just 10 turnovers for the home team last night. When I thought about it for a moment I realized the trouble on the offensive end early was all the misses. We were giving up the ball not by turnover but by clanging the rim on every conceivable shot and giving up 32 first half rebounds. Ball control and effective ball movement continue to be the hallmarks of this 5-2 run. I read this morning that this was the biggest second half comeback for the Wolves since late '05 vs the Lakers.
antonymous (not verified)04:31pm
Mar 20
I'm a little disappointed that I haven't been able to catch the past few games (aside from glances). But can someone explain how Randy Foye has collected 27 rebounds over the past 3 games? He's never struck me as a crafty positional rebounder like Kidd, but props to him for working at that part of his game when he hasn't been lighting it up...
A.K. Agikamik (not verified)04:57pm
Mar 20
Randy's rebounding, both Monday and last evening, has been exemplary. A lot of them seem to be "mid-range" defensive boards. He's doing a great job of leaving his man on the shot and hitting the "outer lane" aggressively. These aren't deep in the paint but they also aren't the cheap ones guards often get that pop way out. Its great to see - and his hops look like they are back on a lot of these more than I'm even seeing when he drives the hoop for a score.
Britt Robson10:17pm
Mar 20
Foye is often leaving his man at the shot and going down to the opposite side of the rim. If the shot is long, he's in good position to get the board. Once I started noticing it a couple games ago, I occasionally try to see if it affects coverage of his man if the opponent grabs the offensive rebound. So far it hasn't happened on the handful of occasions when I've thought to look for it. Only once has the offensive rebound been made (when I've been paying attention to it), and Foye was able to get back on his man in time.
midlife crisis (not verified)12:13am
Mar 21
Thanks for the details, Britt. One of the reasons I've enjoyed this blog so much (and the articles that preceded it) is the way it unlocks aspects of the game that I haven't been looking for. It really opens up my eyes and helps me to look forward to the next game (unless I'm looking for the Blount, Wright, and Davis giggle clutch on the bench). Also, isn't it beautiful how winning (even if just a small run) cures all ills. If we lose against Memphis, we replay Taylor's remarks. A win, though, and we are immersed into the game. If we win enough that we pick up a mid first round PG (Augustin) or goonish C (Thabeet), then we avoid another 6' 3" tweener and can feel good about the team over the coming summer.
levi (not verified)09:59am
Mar 21
I've noticed Randy getting those rebounds too and wondered what the heck he was doing down there. It seems a little suspect, but it may be a coached behavior. I guess we need to watch the other PG's play to see if they are doing it too.
Jim (not verified)04:53pm
Mar 20
I hate to do this Brewer lovers, but I feel the Thornton criticism a few posts ago was unfair and borderline illogical: Thornton put up 24 points, shot 16 free throws, had 13 boards, two assists and a steal against Golden State while Brew compiled three points, two free throws, two rebounds and zero assists against Memphis. Good thing Brewer is a whole *two* years younger than Thornton.
Andy G (not verified)05:11pm
Mar 20
I'd quickly point out that Thornton's nice line was very helpful in their 16-point loss, in a game that was over by halftime, and he may be well on his way toward a Ricky Davis/Shareef Abdur-Rahim-like career of big fantasy numbers on terrible teams. Ricky is still getting some decent numbers on the worst team in the NBA, and one of the worst in NBA history.
Jim (not verified)05:33pm
Mar 20
So should we discount all the huge numbers Al Jefferson has put up in the Timberwolves 50 losses this season too?
Andy G (not verified)05:56pm
Mar 20
You can discount Jefferson's numbers if you think they came at the expense of team success. In my opinion, he was able to get his numbers in spite of less-than-perfect conditions for him. He plays out of position and (for most of the year) without enough perimeter shooting to take off the inordinate defensive attention that he faced most of the year. I haven't watched Thornton enough to have a major opinion on him, but when he was here the other night, he looked like a guy with a great NBA body, a bad attitude, and a one-on-one scorer's mindset. That may work for him, if he gets so good at it that a team wants to run their offense through him on a consistent basis. His attitude looked sketchy enough, and his shot looked ugly enough, however, for me to think that him in that role would be for a loser like all of Ricky D's teams and most of Shareef's teams. I'd much rather run the bulk of my offense through Al Jeff than Al Thornton. Also, if my initial assessment was accurate, and his primary interest is scoring in isolation sets, I don't think that compliments Foye, McCants, or Jefferson, who need guys to fill a different role that Brewer shows a lot of potential to do. I'll be a lot more interested in Al Thornton's production next year when Brand returns. I'm not saying he'll be good or bad, but it will show how he fits in to a better team with a clear-cut go-to guy in the post. Last night's game was a joke. Golden State ran em off the floor in the first half and just about anybody could've cranked up open shots and gotten their 20+ and 10+.
Jim (not verified)06:14pm
Mar 20
That's a solid response, except for the part where you say you haven't formed a major opinion on Thornton even though you've already dismissed him as a Ricky Davis clone. Last night wasn't the only big game for him, he's gone off for over thirty multiple times, and he, like Jefferson is on a bad team. Maybe he doesn't have the choir boy image Brewer does, but he's hardly the malcontent head case some people seem to be making him out to be. My main beef is that people seem quick to assert that Thonton is less likely to improve his game than Brewer because some how it is easier to get bigger and learn to score than it is to play better defense, know when to push the ball and position your feet on pick and roll rotations. Truthfully, I haven't watched Thornton or Brewer enough to have a full opinion on them either, but I can honestly say that at the time of last year's draft I would have taken Thornton because he's a guy who can get to the rim and finish — a requirement in my opinion for a legit starting 3 — and Brewer appears like he's a long ways from being able to do so.
Andy G (not verified)06:38pm
Mar 20
Yeah, I think this ongoing debate has taken me from "I've hardly seen Thornton, but it's too early to decide" to "Thornton is the next Ricky Davis and Brewer is the next Scottie Pippen." I just tried to watch Thornton closely the other night, since a lot of people wish we had taken him. That night, he didn't do much, or look like he was trying to do much. Could have been an off night, or maybe I just took too much away from little things like when he was standing with his hands on his hips during an actual offensive set. You're probably right that he can put up numbers, maybe not necessarily on a bad team, but I stand by the idea that another scorer mentality doesn't benefit our young core.
antonymous (not verified)08:57pm
Mar 20
As a side note, I personally don't remember Thornton being discussed over Brewer when it came draft time last year. I remember names like Noah, Hawes, Green, maybe Wright. Of course hindsight is 20/20, and there are always going to be guys you would rather have who get picked up later. While I personally kinda liked Thornton, McHale could not afford to reach with that pick, and Thornton was clearly a reach. The upcoming draft will be no different. We will have a good pick in a relatively deep draft, but we can't take Donte Greene or Kevin Love with the #5 pick. Anyway, my point is that there's a LOT of weight in the projections, and there's no "diamond in the rough" at that draft position, you rely on the quality of your scouting.
Britt Robson10:13pm
Mar 20
A great, intelligent exchange. Andy G, the one thing I do want to add in here is the night you are speaking of when you saw Thornton is a night when he was considered questionable to play because of a leg injury--Kamen's injury on top of that is why he eventually was thrown in for his ineffective minutes. That said, I'm on record as thinking Brewer has a greater upside than Thornton, as I've mentioned in conversation with Jim on this site in previous threads. He's been very open-minded about it, which is especially admirable since he is coming from a pretty strong position, given Thornton's performance thus far this year. One thing that I think is fairly safe to say is that Al Thornton with the #14 pick was very good value for the Clips.
gjk (not verified)11:54pm
Mar 20
This was the debate that was going on last year when they were trying to figure out who to pick -- many thought Brewer would be good down the road and be able to do a lot of things, many also thought Thornton would have the more immediate impact because he's already 24 and came into the league with a lot of physical strength.
Andy G (not verified)12:01am
Mar 21
Thanks, that input is helpful. I was actually going to say something about how Thornton had a big line and how maybe my earlier harsh assessment was off, but then Jim beat me to it, so I had to play Devil's Advocate. Thornton will probably be a better scorer than Brewer, but I stand by the idea that we don't need more scorers. That's why I so strongly emphasize Derrick Rose in this coming draft--and worst case, a strong center without a scorer mentality--(but hopefully a decent free throw percentage). I agree 100% that Brew needs to hit open shots, ESPECIALLY with his uncanny ability to get himself open off the screen, head-fake, and/or dribble. Just an average jumpshot would get him a smooth 12-14 ppg, that wouldn't disrupt any chemistry or take away touches for Big Al. The Clips, the other night, were playing some really shitty ball, taking turns at 1 on 1, and I'm sure that wasn't Thornton's fault. Maggette was the only guy who looked ready to play ball, so I wasn't that enthused about the win, but equally relieved we didn't actually succumb to that type of crapfest. I didn't watch much of last night's game, but saw the end when Rudy Gay mysteriously stopped getting touches. One more thing about Thornton, and it's a pretty general comment about players of his type/potential caliber. I worry about guys with a bigtime scorer mentality and body, but without the game to QUITE take it to the top-notch level. Some examples of what I'm getting at are Joe Johnson and Vince Carter--(except for maybe a season or three in Toronto). I like having one of two situations: 1) You have Jordan, Kobe, LeBron, or maybe even T-Mac...dominant scorers that are going to get theirs in big games and score their way to wins; or 2) You have a balanced attack, like Paul/West/Chandler, Billups/Hamilton/Prince/Wallace, Parker/Ginobili/Duncan...or.... Cassell/Sprewell/Garnett... anyway, we have no Kobe or LeBron, so I think we need to go the chemistry route, that's why I think careful GM'ing--(hold the McHale jokes)--is key here, and the Brewer pick was smart. Putting together a real team isn't impossible if you get 4 straight lottery picks and a trade for Al Jefferson. I think we're a true point guard and a true center away from a legit contender down the road, and a playoff team starting whenever AJ becomes a 27/12 All-Star, which may be next year. That's a long way of repeating for the 13th time that I like Brewer for this team more than Thornton. Also, it may seem irreconcilable that I am a McCants supporter, and yet question that idea of a less than dominant scorer seeking a prominent role as the gunner of the team. However, I think his bench role is what makes this work. He keeps things afloat when Foye--(who may lack McCants skill set, but seems to more than make up for it in BB-IQ, and perhaps emotional stability)--and Jefferson take a rest. As much as I enjoy watching Shaddy rip it up in short spurts, if he can't accept that 6th man role, I'm fine watching him walk. As a starter, I can't see him on a great team, or maybe even a good team. But I think he's a big help in smaller doses.
Jerry (not verified)05:48pm
Mar 20
I have convinced myself that if the Wolves play hard in their remaining games and win a few more games and get a few less ping pong balls, then Karma will smile on them and we will get the number one pick. We certainly have proven that tanking at the end of the season means that Karma will punish you for your disgraceful play. The only thing that can ruin this is if Glenn Taylor continues to say things that will reduce the good Karma around a team trying to win games.
drza44 (not verified)01:42pm
Mar 21
This Wolves team is looking more and more like the team that I thought they'd be to start the year. Like Britt, I was a big proponent of last season's KG + Kids line-up. Though I expected it to not work as well with Big Al instead of KG, I still thought that core could be competitive early in the year and dangerous by the stretch. In my season predictions article I figured the Wolves to win more than last season's 32 games, and to be the proverbial "team nobody wants to play" by the end. Of course, my expectations didn't happen. A big part of that was Foye's absence, so I was really interested to see what happened once he was back. The Wolves are by no means world-beaters at this point, but I get more convinced every day that the Foye/McCants backcourt really could be very good. And with the two of them on the perimeter, things could really open up for Big Al next season. I think this team is closer to being competitive than most realize, and though they still have a LONG way to go I feel like their offseason needs aren't nearly as impossible as they seemed just a couple of months ago.
levi (not verified)09:22pm
Mar 21
Without apology, drza44, it is my considered opinion that anyone "believing" that a Foye/McCants starting backcourt is viable has been drinking far too much Kool-Aid. I suppose that I should define "viable" in the NBA team context. By viable, I mean serviceable on a championship contending team. It doesn't mean that the duo (or individual) must be the team's core strength, but it does mean that they can't suck. Look, Foye just isn't a natural point guard. Watching him play, he's giving up the ball at the earliest opportunity to get rid of it, not to create scoring opportunities for his teammates. McCants might be an OK off guard for a college team, but his lack of height, selfishness, lack of team awareness, and unwillingness/inability to play defense cannot be overcome at the NBA by his ghetto attitude and off the ball cheap shots. It's my contention that the following championship contending duos totally expose Foye/McCants: Celtics: Rondo / Allen Pistons: Billups / Hamilton Spurs: Parker / Ginobilli Suns: Nash / Bell Rockets: Alston / McGrady Lakers: Fisher-Bryant
Paul (ikrushlots) (not verified)11:00am
Mar 22
Foye/McCants lineups +22 in 58 minutes this season. I did not include lineups with Telfair or Jaric. While I currently won't equate Foye/McCants with any of the lineups you listed, it still can work. However, I prefer McCants as a sixth man (who plays a good amount of minutes according to matchups--with or wihout Foye). I'd take Foye over Fisher, Rondo and Alston.
drza44 (not verified)12:07pm
Mar 22
re: Foye and McCants. Levi, there is a huge, chasm-like difference between what I said "Foye and McCants really could (one day) be very good)" and what you rebutted that they are not currently serviceable on a championship caliber team. I don't believe that any player currently on the Wolves, including big Al, are championship caliber at their position and role. Unless something major changes, I don't think that any of the Wolves will be championship caliber at their position and role next season. But I do think that, as I said, they have some pieces that will help them be that "team that nobody wants to play" by this time next year and hopefully they keep growing from there. Foye isn't a natural point guard, but McCants is showing more ability than I expected on that front and really they just seem to have synergy with each other. They showed it last year in very limited minutes even with McCants coming back from injury, and they've shown it this year in very limited minutes even with Foye coming back from injury. I want to see it tested on a larger basis next season before I really tout it too hard or write it off as impossible. Whether both are starters or one is the sixth man isn't (at this point) the most important thing IMO, but I do want to see them get big minutes together against top competition on a season-long basis and see if their current success is transferable.
levi (not verified)10:17am
Mar 24
I actually did mean to imply that Foye/McCants would *never* be viable as a starting guard combo on a championship contending team. Sure, it would be a luxury to watch them play together for a season before making a final call. But my call is to cut bait, while yours is to keep fishing.
Paul (ikrushlots) (not verified)01:44pm
Mar 21
Nice to see positive Foye analysis that went beyond the stats. I personally would like to see Foye get more aggressive as a scorer. Here are some interesting per 36 minutes stats: Craig Smith: 17.3 points, 8.3 rebounds Rashad McCants: 19.4 points, 3.8 rebounds, 3 assists Ryan Gomes: 15 points, 7 rebounds Corey Brewer: 9 points, 6 rebounds, 1.4 steals Chris Richardson: 6 points, 8 rebounds

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <i> <b> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
By entering in the words in the captcha image, you help us prevent automated spam submissions and keep the site tidy.

Blogs

Sports

Baseball:
Warning Track Power by Alex Halsted
Sports:
On the Ball by Britt Robson

Society

Weather:
Dude Weather by Jimmy Gaines

A&E

Fiction:
Write Now! by Terry Faust

Retired

Hockey:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Style:
Hook & Eye
Misc:
Is This News?
Fiction:
Yo, Ivanhoe by Brad Zellar
Food:
Consider the Egg by Stephanie March
Wine:
Beyond the Cask
Food:
Food Fight!
Media:
To the Slaughter
Misc:
Outrage by Staff
Food:
Chef's Table
Guest Commentary:
Just Passing Through
Humor:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Cars:
Road Rake by Chris Birt
Commentary:
Read Menace by Tom Bartel
Society:
The Adventures of Melinda by Melinda Jacobs
Politics:
Defenestrator by Rich Goldsmith
Food:
Breaking Bread by Jeremy Iggers & Ann Bauer
Books:
Cracking Spines by Max Ross
Music:
Hear, Hear by Staff
Art:
The Vicious Circle by 6 Critics
Secrets:
Secrets of the Day by Kate Iverson
Theater:
Seen in the City by Staff
Film:
Talk About Talkies by Staff