Dude Weather Subscribe to Secrets Minneapolis / St. Paul

On the Ball

The Three Pointer: The Best Yet This Season

Share

(AP Photo/Jim Mone)


Game #55, Home Game #30: Utah 100, Minnesota 111

Season Record: 12-43

1. The Beauty of Teamwork

It's been a long time--certainly a year, maybe two--since fans of the Minnesota Timberwolves have seen this kind of 48 minutes from their ballclub. There have been some really nice wins thus far this season: The roaring final 3 quarters that produced the 131 points versus Indiana, the two convincing wins over Phoenix, and the solid rousting of Philly just last week. And there have been enjoyably well-played losses to Boston (the one on the road), Atlanta (the one on the road), and San Antonio (last week). But Indiana and Philly are sub-mediocrities, the style Phoenix plays is prone to their occasional pratfalls, and the losses were ultimately losses, after all.

Tonight the Wolves beat a very good team--19-4 in 2008 heading into this game--by mixing aggression and sound judgment, tenacity and tact, and, above all, a full-fledged sense of selflessness for the sake of the ballclub. Such teamwork is harder to describe than witness--it's always easier to isolate what's wrong with a car than why it works so well from ignition to muffler--but worth the effort if only to savor it. There are all the little things. Randy Foye jumping right in the middle of the paint to set a pick for Al Jefferson. Rashad McCants diving toward the hoop wide open and not receiving the pass, yet diligently circling back out to probe for other ways he can extend the play. Ryan Gomes rotating over to deter penetration and cover for his late-arriving teammate, then sliding to the other side of the lane to box out his own man after the shot goes up. Corey Brewer scrambling to the sideline and backhanding the ball in to save the possession, then getting back in time to tip in the subsequent shot less than two seconds later. Foye scrambling back hard enough in transition to be able to set his feet for a charge.

Utah is a physical team, charter members of the Frequent Foulers Club, expert in rubbing out obstacles with back-door picks and other traffic-jamming Xs and Os designed to sap your spirit and bruise your muscles. They wait to seize the lapses that are the byproduct of fatigue. But the Wolves beat Utah at their own game. Wittman threw new man Kirk Snyder on Utah enforcer Matt Harpring and Snyder, who practiced against Harpring often his rookie year after being drafted by Utah, went shoulder to shoulder, toe to toe and more than once joined him on the floor in their mutual mania for the round orb. Theo Ratliff took the measure of another bench bruiser for the Jazz, Paul Milsapp, and, although it required 5 fouls in 12:31, helped flummox the second year player. By the third and early in the fourth period, many Utah shots were banging front iron.

Muckers like Craig Smith and Ryan Gomes mucked, but so did Foye and McCants and Telfair, and Big Al. They gave little away for free to Utah, staying with their men by wedging themselves over picks or switching off smartly, alert to the entire court, vertical and horizontal, the breakaways and the back-door cuts. They kept their heads on a swivel and their hands up for deflections, grabbing 16 steals (one short of the franchise record) and disrupting at least that many other possessions. Utah did not execute poorly--the Jazz shot 46.4% and had 26 assists--but the Wolves also forced them into a season-high 24 turnovers. Three Wolves--Jefferson/Foye/McCants--had three steals and Telfair and Gomes had two.

The offense was even more fun to watch. It brimmed with minor decisions that made already good possibilities just a little bit better. Telfair led the team with just 4 assists, and two big men off the bench, Smith and the newcomer Snyder had 3. McCants would have an open look for his jumper but see Jefferson sealing his man and already anticipating the double team, so he'd dump in the entry pass, watch Jefferson spin one-on-three into the lane and draw the foul. McCants gets the glow of feeling unselfish; Al the gusto of barging into the teeth of Sloan's boys in the paint, a Jazz player is that much closer to foul trouble and Jefferson nails the free throws (he was 8-10 FT overall). Another time down, Jefferson has the ball and is crab-dribbling into the double until he push-passes a final dribble into the hands of McCants, swinging over five feet behind him and getting his feet in position, even as Jefferson becomes the de facto screen on his two men and the other McCants has just rubbed off him. Shaddy nails the open look (8-17 FG), Jefferson drops an easy dime (one of two tonight) and Utah knows there are legit threats being wielded at either end of this two-man game.

Except that it's a five man game. The three-headed monster Wolves fans have been pining for--Jefferson, McCants and Foye--all take their closeups, damn well linger in it, maybe for two or three possessions in a row if the matchups are right, abetted by the other four teammates in the little ways described above. But then, for one of the few times this year, the emphasis moves before it has to. Foye's hot, but cedes to Shaddy, or Al, who goes and gets some, but doesn't mark the territory for pecking order purposes. In the first half, Foye has 9 shots, Jefferson 7, McCants 8; for the game Foye has 16 shots, McCants 17, Jefferson 17. Jefferson and McCants tie for the scoring lead with 22, Foye a whisker behind at 20.

And 20 from Ryan Gomes makes it only the second time in the last 10 years, and the first time since January 2004, that four Wolves go off for 20 points or more. Gomes, of course, is different. He is the best individual barometer for this team, because his game is glue, everything geared to teamwork, meaning his perceptive movements without the ball will get him a bushel of sly, easy looks at the hoop if others notice and feed him. Tonight he was 7-15 FG and grabbed team highs in rebounds (11) and offensive boards (4). When the Wolves play this unselfishly, he is probably the most emblematic, and will likely be among the most obscure, especially in relation to his contribution.

2. Coming Out Party

Hey, it's Randy Foye, circa January or Feburary 2007. Those who have been counseling us Foye critics to wait until the guy was back in game shape can gloat a little off this performance. Too often in his first 11 appearances this season Foye wallowed in boom-or-bust mode, bent on arching up treys or taking his shakey wheels for a traipse through the lane. Tonight he threw in the deceptively tough stuff, the midrange game, the runners and the pull-ups and the dish on the move. It made a huge difference both in making the treys and the lay-up tries more unpredictible and in fostering the ball and player movement so much on display tonight. As I mentioned earlier, and am anxious to repeat, Foye, McCants and Jefferson passed the baton fairly regularly tonight. There were three go-to guys and nobody bitched/sulked/malingered or otherwise acted out if one of the other two was bogarting the crayons in the sandbox. And while Foye is not a point guard (16 shots, 2 assists), he is a buffer against the idea of either/or between Jefferson and McCants.

"We've said we have to be patient with Randy," an elated Wittman cautioned after the game. "There's probably going to be another down before there is another up."

And when there is, I'll describe it and probably criticize it. But tonight's effort gave credence to the "still recovering from injury" feeling about Foye; there was physical confidence in this "up." Yeah, Foye missed a chippie or two, but the shot selection was light years better than the chuck-fests he showed previously. Maybe this won't be so much of a "limbo" season for Foye after all.

3. In Praise of Wittman

With ten minutes to go in the game and the Wolves clinging to a one point lead, Randy Wittman opted out of his big lineup, subbing in Ryan Gomes and Craig Smith for Ratliff and Jefferson, with Foye, McCants and Snyder filling out the rotation. For those breaking out the slide rules at home, that's no player above 6-7 (if you believe Craig Smith is 6-7). As a stalwart big lineup guy, I sharpened the poison pen.

But Wittman had noticed Utah coach Jerry Sloan sitting his best players, Carlos Boozer and Deron Williams, limiting the Jazz's options on offense. And he knew a front line of Okur (6-11), Harping (6-7) and Millsap (6-8), might have trouble defending a quicker team in the 4th quarter.

Boom. Foye nailed a trey off a feed from Gomes. Harping tried a jump-hook over Smith on the baseline that didn't go. Foye missed another trey attempt but Gomes got the board. His shot was blocked by Millsap but Smith got the board. His shot was blocked by Harpring, but Smith got it back, and laid it in. Millsap missed a jumper from the side of the key and Foye rebounded, leading to a neat layup by Gomes on an assist from Snyder. Sloan hurriedly called timeout and got Boozer and D-Will back in the game, but, in just 1:54, the smallball Wolves had bumped a single digit up to 8, permanently changing the complexion of the game.

Had it gone exactly the other way--smallball giving the Jazz a quick seven and swinging the tide--the anti-Wittman venom from me and others would have been righteous. Because he's got a lousy won-loss record, he's fairly bland, he stunk up the joint in his coaching stint last year, and he enjoys the support of McHale, Taylor and some others who have been incumbents of the downfall. We're quick to criticize and slow to praise.

So give the man his due for the smallball gambit--it's not like that quintet had ever played a minute together before, and it may have been the difference tonight. Wittman also chose this game to showcase Kirk Snyder, who doesn't know all the team's plays but logged an effective 24:09 tonight because Witt liked matching him up with the beef of Harpring and Kirilenko at the small forward slot. He probably also knew Snyder had that stint in Utah and Sloan doesn't change spots that much. Snyder, anxious to make a splash and mindful of his impending free agency, was the right feature at the right time. There was also the fabled Wittman discipline, but lower-keyed and effective this time. After the Wolves raced out to an 8-2 lead, Utah scored the next ten points, leading to a no-nonsense time out from Wittman. Smart move whether he said anything or simply broke the prevailing momentum--the Wolves scored the next seven points.

PS--City Pages writer Jonathan Kaminsky has a nice, long, profile of Al Jefferson up on the citypages.com site. Worth reading.

 

18 Reader Comments

Wim (Belgium) (not verified)05:08am
Feb 27
Woah; 4 players with 20 points, who would have thought that one or two weeks in the season. Britt, if Snyder keeps playing like he did. Would you think he might be the SF you spoke about before the all star break? Does his talent seem good enough right now to think about maybe keeping him? I'm defenitly intrigued. Also good to hear Witt praise the players at timberwolves.com and hear he called well timed timeouts. Seems the coach is growing as well... "Maybe this won't be so much of a "limbo" season for Foye after all." Would also like to praise you for this Britt. Not a lot of people openly admit when they might have been wrong. I've noticed it with McCants too. Apart from how the player performed in a certain game, I feel like you keep a sort of vision how you see the player and it's nice to see that sometimes change as the player progresses or degresses. I feel like I've seen every game this season while in fact I have only seen one here and there...
Just a Fan (not verified)08:42am
Feb 27
Before we go crazy regarding Snyder, I know, from inside information, that he felt absolutely abused by Solan and Company during his time in Utah. So, you had a highly motivated player, with a tremendous amount of experience playing against those guys in practice, who wanted nothing more than to stick it in their XXX. Hats off to Wittman for recognizing that and taking advantage of it. But lets not get too carried away until we can see if his performance can be repeated (frequently) against other teams. His history would suggest that last night's performance may be the aberration, not the norm. Say the game quickly on DVR this AM and agree the ball movement was excellent. Hope we keep that up. As for the Wittman small ball line up, excuse me if I chalked that up to the "even a blind squirrel finds the occasional acorn". That line up has been, by and large, miserable (see Dallas Sunday evening). The ball movement mania established earlier in the game did seem to permeate the 2nd unit which made it effective. I hope, though not very optimistically, that will continue.
Nate (not verified)09:17am
Feb 27
I was impressed by Snyder's play. I was even more impressed by the quality of his play compared to the quality of Gerald Green's play. Snyder's pass on the break to Gomes for the layup is not a play that Gerald Green makes. Snyder seemed to have at least a minor awareness of the game being played around him on the court. I'm not sure he's got a future on this squad or in the league, but getting a look at him for 25 games and getting a second round pick for Green seems like a good deal. It will be interested to see what kind of playing time Bassy gets in the fourth quarter. He didn't get much run last night with Foye and McCants playing well.
SettlingForJumpers (not verified)09:47am
Feb 27
I've been really impressed by McCants, especially since the all-star break. Those drives to the hoop are sublime; he just floats through traffic and then makes a difficult shot look so easy. There really is a lot of Ginobli in his game. He just needs to keep a cool head. I'm not sold on Snyder. Maybe this is the fresh start he needs, but he has a checkered past. Then again, so did Bassy. But Bassy was never regarded as a cancer. It was more an issue of needing to grow up and make better choices off the court. There is a reason Houston gave up Snyder for a circus sideshow. Truthfully, he didn't show me anything that Marko hasn't shown. And unless they can find a taker for Marko, there is only room in the rotation for one of them. Marko has really grown on me. He can play three positions, including long stretches at the point. If last night was the rule not the exception for Foye, I think they'll be much less aggressive in trying to re-sign Bassy and Marko will be very useful. My theory is that all is well for any player as long as their shots fall. If Foye continues making buckets from medium and long range, his inadequacies at the point will seem less pronounced.
antonymous (not verified)01:42pm
Feb 27
Anyone else google for Kirk Snyder and get the link in my name? Additional weird trivia: we now have the 13th, 15th, and 16th picks in the 2004 draft - Bassy, Al, and Snyder. The 14th? Kris Humphries. I'm going to chalk up Snyder's performance to "new team infatuation". Most people think that playing with a new squad is difficult (it is, I'm sure), but everyone else adjusts to what the new guy's game brings on the fly, which can create opportunities that you aren't expecting, like last night. If Snyder replaces Green in the rotation, at least he's a player I have confidence in, rather than Green who thinks he's the next T-Mac.
Xand (not verified)01:42pm
Feb 27
Well, I'd hope you weren't sold on a guy after one game, as that'd be about as silly as PA stating he's disappointed with Brewer because he's not giving us 12-15ppg/5-7rpg/2-3spg on a nightly basis (yes he actually said that). However, it almost sounds like you have a personal dislike of the guyy, which strikes me as a bit silly given much we know about him. I wouldn't say he has a "checkered past" if you're referring to the well-documented strife from his Utah days.. he acknowledged his immaturity and said he was in the wrong. Sounds like a guy who's in the process of growing up and figuring things out. I'm definitely not sold on him after one game either, but I did see some very encouraging signs that he actually knows how to play basketball, which already gives him a leg up on Green in my eyes. He made numerous nice passes which demonstrated bball knowledge and good court vision, including a time he posted his guy up on the right baseline, took two dribbles to draw some attention and hit a cutting McCants who was fouled on his way up to the hoop. It doesn't show up in the box score beyond the free throw's, but he initiated the play that allowed McCants to go up strong and get fouled. I also liked that he seemed to be able to put the ball on the floor and actually do something with his dribble, be it make a pass or take his guy strong to the rack and force contact. Who knows where he'll be next year, but I already like him more than Green. He has some potential defensively and actually seems to have a bball IQ higher than his jersey number. Given our current situation, I consider any shot at talent to be worthwhile so I'm looking at seeing him some more. If he turns out to be a dud, we let him walk. If not, we're that much better. Seems like a win-win to me.
SettlingForJumpers (not verified)03:48pm
Feb 27
Where do you see that I dislike the guy? I'm pretty indifferent. I just think that Marko fills that role, does some nice things in his own right and probably isn't going anywhere. There's no sense in giving Snyder Marko's minutes when Marko has actually played decently this season. Look, it's nice that they got a throw-in that wasn't a liability in his first game. But considering the shoes he's filling, I guess that makes him Oscar Robertson.
Anonymous (not verified)05:25am
Feb 27
SettlingForJumpers (not verified), on Feb 26, 2008 at 05:06 pm That's a tough business, and even more so for a local publication that values quality journalism above all. I'm glad Three-Pointer lives on and I look forward to reading your take on tonight's bloodbath. Errrr SettlingforJumpers :) Ok I admit I only turned on the radio with 5 minutes left in the 4th quarter. Really nice performance from the youngin's.
Peter Weinhold (not verified)06:57am
Feb 27
What struck me was the decision-making across the board. McCants in particular wasn't a ball stopper; it gives me hope that he may get it after a time. I think it will be interesting to see whether he would accept a permanent sixth man role off the bench. I have doubts on that one. Again, when this team decides to play defense and is aggressive, they create offensive opportunities. Even though they only shot around 43%, no one complained about their lack of perimeter shooting. Going back to the very core requirements of "Smashmouth According to McHale", it would seem that getting the club to play with energy and focus brings the best out of this bunch. When the rhythm is pulsating, they shoot well enough to win. As these folks decide how to keep growing the team, actually paying attention to that primary identity piece would be welcome, as opposed to adding jump shooters next year. I've seen Flip Saunders, and Randy Wittman is no Flip.
Jackson (not verified)09:16am
Feb 27
Great game. Congrats to the Wolves and nice write up by Britt. I'd like to bring up Craig the Rhino. The last couple of games he has had some pretty darn flashy moves. He is a big guy and seeing him pull off these moves is pretty impressive. I am not sure of Bball terminology but I think you could say he has a pretty good "handle"? He can surely handle the ball well and make some nice moves on his drives to the hoop. I am impressed. Many say that he doesn't fit on this team but I just hate to let a guy like that go. He seems to have some intangibles that we shouldn't part with if we don't have to. Is being slightly undersized really that big of a problem?
antonymous (not verified)01:27pm
Feb 27
I don't think you'll find many Wolves fans who want to see Craig go. He's an excellent ballhandler (that's handle), has a nose for the ball, and does lots of little things to help this club out. And he's sneaky-quick when he flashes through the lane. The problem is that he plays the same natural position as Al Jefferson, and he's a below-average post (and weakside) defender. I personally don't think his size is a problem at all, except that he is just a little too slow to guard the SF position against quicker wing players. I don't think the Wolves will give him up, but he may be able to get a bigger role elsewhere if we aren't willing to overpay a little for him.
doubleplusgood (not verified)10:43am
Feb 27
I attended my first game of the year last night, although I've followed them on TV all year. My friend was convinced we'd get blown out. i said it would be competitive, but we both agreed the Wolves hadn't figured out how to close out games. I never expected a game like we saw. The team play, the defensive hustle, 5 guys in double figures (4 with 20/each, although Foye was begging to go the line 4 times in the last 30 seconds to get his). The best part was that the outcome was never really in doubt. The Wolves kept the throttle on the whole game and scored 111. It's been spoken of many times on this blog about this being a season of figuring out what the Wolves have. And the consensus has been outside of Jefferson, we don't know. I think since the Denver game, we're getting closer to an answer. Despite their record, I think the Wolves are fairly competitive team right now. Of course, there are occasional collapses, but when this team plays together, they often times can go toe to toe with the better teams in the league (ie. San Antonio, Phoenix, Utah, Boston, Denver, Dallas (despite the breakdown in the 4th). We finally have all our players back and there is some semblance of a rotation that is about 8-9 deep. I think if the season started today, they'd be much closer to a .500 team than they currently are. This is an extremely young team that outside of Jaric, McCants, Smith, and Foye, have only played together for 55 games. Their core of Jefferson (4), Foye (1), McCants (2.5), Gomes (3), Smith (2), Brewer (1), and Telfair (4) have an average of 2.5 years experience in the NBA There's a tendency for writers and fans to expect too much, too soon from young players in the NBA. I would say for most players, it takes 3 years for a player to develop into a big time player. There are exceptions to this like LeBron, D-Wade, Chris Paul etc. But most rookies on decent teams get limited minutes their first year playing behind a glut of established players at their position. Those that show promise right from the start, that 3 year window is thrown out, and we expect them to play at a level that exceeds our original expectations when they came into the league. What is often overlooked in the process are things like team chemistry and makeup, whether coaches are playing these players to their strengths, and most importantly minutes. Foye has essentially played one season with an entirely different team as last year for two coaches and spent the majority of this year injured. What is a reasonable expectation of him after 12 games? He will always be compared to Brandon Roy, but time will tell whether he becomes the player we, after only one season, expect him to now be in his second. I agree he's a better at the 2 guard, but again, that's not on him, it's on the coaches recognizing this. Is Shaddy a better player now than he was his 1st or 2nd season? Is Telfair, a guy who had NBA bust written all over him wasting away in Portland and Boston, closer to a viable point guard in year 3? In his third year, with a new system centered around him, is Jefferson now a legitimate Top 10 low post player in the league? Look at what Danny Granger, LaMarcus Aldridge, Andrew Bynum, and Martel Webster are starting to do 3 years in with consistent playing time. I'm not calling anyone out here, I'm just saying that sometimes you draft Deron Williams and know what you have right away, but most times you draft Linas Kleiza, wait a couple years, and then find out that you want to keep him more than trading him for Artest. Let's just let it play out, before we decide. Same goes with Brewer. In 3 years, Brewer will be be stronger and have a better mid-range jumper. He's already shown the intangibles that will keep him in this league a long time. He just needs time. Because the make-up of this team is almost exclusively guys with 4 or less years experience, it's easier to criticize their deficiencies when analyzing the games. I do think this blog does a very good job of balancing promise with actual play. I just think people need to keep that fact in mind when watching this team this year. I think this team has made great strides since the beginning of the year. In no way are we there yet, but this is a rebuilding project and construction will be ongoing into the next couple of years, but I'm much more excited to watch this team play than I was 2 months ago and I think that's progress.
Jerry (not verified)11:15am
Feb 27
I had a great night last night. I watched the Wolves beat Utah on one TV and listend to Obama beat Hillary on another TV. It definately was better than listening to Jim Peterson announce the game. I am really starting to like the McCants, Foye, Bassy rotation. I really don't like when all three play at once and McCants is forced to guard a small forward. But, after last night, it seems like things are looking up. So are we one big center away from being in the playoffs? One big center, improved shooting by Brewer and 3-4 more years of experience from being in the NBA finals? My cup is suddenly looking half full!
Jim (not verified)11:53am
Feb 27
Jim Pete and Tom H's constant over-the-top praise of Al Jefferson is making it hard to watch the broadcasts. He's a great offensive player, a nice guy, young and improving. We all get it, guys. To drone on and on about his youth and off the court attitude is more than annoying, especially since Jim Pete is notorious for lavishing ridiculous praise on guys he trashed the second they left town, i.e. Blount and even Candy puke. Last night he again made the lame argument that Al's less-than-max contract will allow the Wolves "flexibility" they didn't have before with a certain player's bigger deal. Come on Pete. Stop the back-handed insinuation that the team's recent troubles were caused even in part by Garnett's contract. It's all on the braintrust's poor decisions. It's fine to be excited about big Al and I know he's a company man doing a job, but these guys need to have more respect for Wolves fans than they show.
Andy G (not verified)05:57pm
Feb 27
Those two may feel added pressure to point out the positives, since there is so much criticism--(some fair, some not)--of this year's team and front office in the "mainstream" MN Sports media. This blog and group of comment-posters is much more fair and informed than most of the talk-radio and big newspaper columnists, whose job is more to put a spin on things than describe them accurately. Jim Pete puts a bit too much praise on Al Jefferson, but he seemed to concede that he was the second-best power forward in last night's contest. I don't get to watch many of the games on tv, so I'm probably not in the best position to stake an opinion either way, but I don't ever come away feeling especially annoyed with their comments, last night included. About the contract stuff--people would criticize the hell out of AJ if he demanded max money, so I think it's fair to praise him for being realistic and fair in that regard. People can read into whatever they want, whenever they want, but not every compliment of AJ is a criticism of KG. Many have moved beyond that and everyone should as well.
Andy G (not verified)12:50pm
Feb 27
Great win against a Top 7 team in the NBA. One thing that stuck out to me was the balance, both offensively, and in a more general sense of frontcourt vs. backcourt talent. With Gomes/Jefferson basically equalling Foye/McCants in point production, they showed a great deal of offensive balance, good passing both to and from the perimeter, as well as penetration and post-ups. Any time your offense looks that fluid against a Jerry Sloan team, you can feel good about it. I think most would agree that Al Jeff has looked to be our clear-cut best player this season. While I realize that it was only one game, I thought Foye, and especially McCants, looked every bit his equal, if not better last night. Al worried me when he came out guarding Boozer. On an early play, Boozer set a UCLA screen for Deron Williams at the elbow. It led to an easy layup for Williams, as Telfair was slammed hard by the pick, not hearing a word of warning from AJ, and also getting no help through, or a show to stop the play. This is major nit-picking after a great win, but the replay showed Al just casually following Booz up the lane without the thought of warning his teammate entering his mind. McCants, on the other hand, was active on the defensive end for the whole night. His active hands that normally get him into foul trouble led to steals and stops. Boozer had big numbers and looked better than his opponent. McCants and Foye took on one of the league's up-and-coming superstars and came away looking like the better player. Telfair also did some nice things, especially defensively on Williams. McCants and Foye will have to show these all-around games with much greater frequency for me to feel comfortable jumping right into "draft a 7-footer ASAP" mode, but they certainly looked like a formidable backcourt last night.
Anonymous (not verified)01:06pm
Feb 27
I am not going to gloat about Foye, because I know he still will have some bad games as he gets back in the swing of things. However, this game provides some much needed muscle memory for those who forgot about last season. I coudn't believe what I was hearing on KFAN yesterday. Many were already calling Foye a bust. I think that's crazy. There is little doubt in my mind he can be an 17-20 point, 5-7 assist point guard. Early on I have been saying that McCants is best suited as a 6th man and can coexist with Foye. We saw some of that last night. As a sixth man, he can be played to the Wolves advantage according to matchups. Not only do I think he can be a sixth man, I think he has "sixth man of the year" potential. There's not much more I can say about Jefferson that I have not already. If you are a Wolves fan, I hope you have come away with some positives this season. There are definate signs that the pieces are here. As the season continues, the Wolves have improved. They have been competitive in most games and have beat some elite teams that have a lot to play for. That says alot about the youngsters. They are a competitive bunch that will stay motivated even when things are bad. Complete 180 from last season. To end on a sour note, I am disappointed that Brewer is not getting more minutes.
Paul (ikrushlots) (not verified)01:07pm
Feb 27
Last post (1:06 pm) was by me

Blogs

Sports

Baseball:
Warning Track Power by Alex Halsted
Sports:
On the Ball by Britt Robson

Society

Weather:
Dude Weather by Jimmy Gaines

A&E

Fiction:
Write Now! by Terry Faust

Retired

Hockey:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Style:
Hook & Eye
Misc:
Is This News?
Fiction:
Yo, Ivanhoe by Brad Zellar
Food:
Consider the Egg by Stephanie March
Wine:
Beyond the Cask
Food:
Food Fight!
Media:
To the Slaughter
Misc:
Outrage by Staff
Food:
Chef's Table
Guest Commentary:
Just Passing Through
Humor:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Cars:
Road Rake by Chris Birt
Commentary:
Read Menace by Tom Bartel
Society:
The Adventures of Melinda by Melinda Jacobs
Politics:
Defenestrator by Rich Goldsmith
Food:
Breaking Bread by Jeremy Iggers & Ann Bauer
Books:
Cracking Spines by Max Ross
Music:
Hear, Hear by Staff
Art:
The Vicious Circle by 6 Critics
Secrets:
Secrets of the Day by Kate Iverson
Theater:
Seen in the City by Staff
Film:
Talk About Talkies by Staff