Dude Weather Subscribe to Secrets Minneapolis / St. Paul

The Thousandth Word

Seeds of Change?

Share

The first few times I attended the Minnesota State Fair as a kid I found it disappointing. It seemed a little run-down, old-fashioned, and the rides were more rickety (and scary) than all the shiny new stuff at Valleyfair. Plus, I have never liked crowds. Somehow, though, that changed when I became a teenager. Maybe it was just more fun to go with friends than family, but I think the real key was a major discovery: ironic enjoyment. Suddenly things that had seemed old-fashioned became charming or hilarious, crowds that had been overwhelming became fascinating, and the bizarre and confounding elements were the new highlights. Demonstrations of spot-remover in the Grandstand! A stand devoted to milk! Butter carvings of beauty queens! I also discovered crop art.

Lillian Colton display

The first time I saw the crop art display at the fair must have been around 1985. I distinctly remember a couple of the highlights being portraits of Cyndi Lauper and Bill Cosby, but that both seemed a year or two out of date already. Of course, part of the appeal at the time was this ironic enjoyment. What could be goofier or more strange than portraits of celebrities made out of seeds? However, while ironic enjoyment may have opened the door to me looking at this work, my appreciation of these works quickly turned genuine. Creating a realistic portrait by affixing different colored seeds to a panel may be odd, but it certainly takes skill and patience. It was also clearly one of the highlights of the fair for me, as I remember telling incredulous friends about it years later while in college on the East coast.

Over the years I have seen many more of these celebrity portraits, and come to realize that the majority of the amazing portraits were by Lillian Colton, the "Seed Queen," a legendary crop artist who passed away last year. She had been entering the crop art competition since 1966, won the best of show nine times, and was honored this year with a small retrospective display. I have to admit to only being a casual spectator of the displays, and had never quite put together that there were celebrities in the field, or that many of the same artists entered year after year. I hate to say it, but I am sure that was some kind of creeping "fine art" elitism on my part, and now I wish I had paid better attention. Seeing the Colton retrospective, and looking her up since on line, I realize that many of my favorite pieces have always been by one person.

Of course, many other people enter the competition each year, and not all artists create celebrity portraits. Last year I noticed a distinct trend in the crop art entrants: political crop art. This was pretty exciting. There were at least two pro-Al Franken pieces, an elaborate Looney Tunes reference (with Yosemite Sam shooting six-guns and crowing about "Mission Accomplished,") and my favorite, by Teresa Anderson - a somewhat naïve and stylized image of Dick Cheney, with branches growing from his head marked "Corruption," "Fear," Torture," "War," "Repression," "Secrecy," and "Divisiveness." Oh, and of course, the title written in large all-caps letters below "THE ROOT of EVIL." Somehow you couldn't help but come away from the exhibit feeling that middle America was pissed, and it was heartening to think that "regular," crop-art making Minnesotans were giving voice to their frustrations.

Norm Coleman

This year the trend continued, perhaps with even more urgency. I have to assume the RNC convention just a couple of miles from the exhibit hall may have something to do with this. Certainly it added to the impact of these crop art protests. Kim Cope's anti-Norm Coleman piece was the most specific, depicting Norm's head on a bowling pin in the midst of being explosively knocked down by a ball, with the punny inscription "'Spare' us from ‘the Norm.'" (A nice added touch - the scoring box above displays a "turkey," letting us know that this bowler has rolled three strikes in a row, presumably with the "Norm" pin going flying each time.)

GOP poop

The other pieces shared a couple of themes: elephants and their droppings. Paul Weig's was perhaps the most overt, even labeling his elephant "GOP" as it squats to defecate on a pile of papers marked "Constitution," "Bill of Rights," "Climate Change," "Human Rights," etc. A second Kim Cope piece used a similar metaphor, depicting a shovel-wielding Barack Obama following a group of elephants as they head back to a big top tent, saying "Too bad we're stuck cleaning up their messes!" as he scoops up piles labeled "gas prices," "US debt," "falling bridges," "mortgage crisis," "gitmo" and Iraq war."

GOP circus

Teresa Anderson's entry made use of the same metaphor, depicting a line of elephants walking off a cliff, labeled "W," "McSame," "Norm" and "Tim," with text above stating "Cleaning up after the elephants is the dirtiest job in the circus." The most complex of the elephant referencing pieces was surely Laura Melnick's elaborate Dr. Seuss riff, with Thidwick the Big-Hearted Moose supporting an elephant in his antlers, with a thought bubble declaiming, "What was I thinking?" Below the portrait was some Seuss-y text:

Then he dozed off to sleep in his fine moose-hair nest.
"This elephant," said Thidwick,"is sort of a pest!
But I'm a good sport, so I'll just let him rest,
For a host, above all, must be nice to his guest"

Whilst all around the border cartoon protesters hold signs saying "No War," "Peace," "Troops Home," as well as the more Seussian "Obam I Am" and "McCain I Ain."

Thidwick

Once again I came away immediately filled with the sense that regular Midwestern folks had had enough of the current political situation, and were angry enough to say something about it in their own way. (A view that seemed reinforced by the relative lengths of the lines at the DFL and GOP booths at the fair, I might add.) However, it dawned on me, once again, that I might have been making coarse generalizations and assumptions about who is making this crop art. I know nothing of these artists, and have no reason to believe they are rural midwestern voters, rather than urban hipsters, ironically enjoying an old-time craft. The fact is, though, that my initial assumption about the artists is part of the strength of this art as protest: true or not, this work reads as being the voice of common Midwestern folks, who are sick and tired of the current political situation. During every national election the parties and media suddenly discover their love for "real" Americans - the ones in the Midwestern "Heartland," whose opinion is so crucial to the future of the nation.

This Real American is a frustrating cipher. On the one hand, should such a person exist, the majority of Americans do not live lives like theirs, yet many hold this mythic figure in their hearts, as part of their self-definition. Since this figure is largely mythical, his traits and tendencies are pre-determined: hardworking, traditional, patriotic, anti-intellectual, pro-gun, and averse to subtlety and complexity. The portrait suggests that anyone with left of center views is not a real American, and the only populism that the Real American is truly allowed is anti-government, never anti-corporate. No one polls Real Americans to adjust the portrait, because anyone not fitting the description would by definition not be "real."

This, I think, is part of what gives these political crop art pieces their extra power. They read as though this mythic figure has had a change of mind, in a way that they wouldn't if they were paintings, photos, collages or video-installations. Perhaps changing the attributes of the mythical Middle American is the key to a real change in political discourse.

13 Reader Comments

Teresa Anderson (not verified)05:33pm
Sep 20
Thanks for the nice article, Rich. Your initial (admitted) assumption that crop artists are rural folks is not correct--at least those you featured all live in the Twin Cities. We hardly qualify as 'hipsters' age-wise, but do appreciate the irony of creating political statements in a kitchy medium. FYI, my unidentified elephant with the jewelry and feathers was supposed to be Michele Bachman. If you haven't visited www.cropart.com, you might find it of interest. This website is maintained by David Steinlicht, another St. Paul crop artist.
Rich Barlow07:28pm
Sep 20
...and thank you for the kind words. I had assumed that was Michelle Bachman, actually, but didn't feel sure enough to say. (Especially when I was admitting to so many other erroneous assumptions!) I do know the crop art site, and tried to link to it in the article (I think each artist's name should be a hyperlink to their page there), though I haven't checked to see if the links work.
Kim Cope (not verified)11:51pm
Sep 20
Thanks for the thoughtful article, and for mentioning my crop art of Al Franken (one of two Frankens from last year) and my pieces this year of Norm Coleman as a pinhead and Obama cleaning up the dirty Republican messes. I especially enjoyed your little joke making the link from Norm Coleman's name go to the wikipedia page of Mayor Quimby from The Simpsons. With your political perspective and sly wit, you sound like most of the crop artists I know. I hope you try your hand at crop art and submit something to the Minnesota State Fair in 2009.
Ann Klefstad (not verified)08:26pm
Sep 21
Rich, I usually like your writing, but I gotta say, as someone who did grow up in deep country, I really hate kitschy urban takes on it. I knew no one in my county who did crop art, other than gradeschoolers who were coerced into such activities by hard-pressed teachers who searched desperately for ways to keep twitchy youngsters' hands occupied. Grownups had things to do that needed doing, because of economic necessity or personal obsession. Whimsy was fortunately in short supply: seems to be an urban/suburban product, in my experience. Lillian Colton may have been a very nice lady, but her seed collages were, in my opinion, boring as art. The collages you show here are not witty, and I can't understand how people can have so much time on their hands . . . couldn't they be, say, doorknocking for Obama or mowing my lawn or something useful? Or at least wasting their time in a way that made for interesting conversation? ak
Jill Yablonski09:22am
Sep 22
Ann, wow. I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that your accusing these artists (whether you find them witty or not) of wasting their time by creating their art is elitist at best, downright insulting no doubt. I suppose you could say any artist was wasting his time if you happened to not like his work, but then he could very well say the same of you. And that would be very grade-school, no? I'm pretty sure the crop artists (like other more respectable(?) artists) don't feel they are wasting their time and would much prefer you mow your own lawn.
ann klefstad (not verified)03:33pm
Sep 22
Jill, what can I say. I'm a critic. I critique. the lawn thing is supposed to be a joke, though of course you have every right not to find it amusing. I just find "crop art" really dull--the artists who commented here describe their own work as kitsch. Rick thinks that this work is being done in earnest, so to speak, by Middle Americans, that is, Good Country Folk. It's actually being done by urban hipsters who proffer it as kitsch. Now, I am not a big kitsch fan, I think there's plenty of volunteer kitsch, you might say, that springs up of itself. I think when artists perform kitsch as a deliberate act it's condescending, both to audiences and to some imagined originary maker of the form who's being gently ridiculed (in this case, Good Country People, who never did do the thing anyway). In other words, this is work that will bring nothing about in the world other than a little mutual backpatting and some preening at one's own goodhumored cleverness and some self-indulgent smiling at imaginary country Others. To me, that's a waste of time. And I do say I have nothing against "wastes of time" that are capable of spurring interesting conversations, but your response--"Hmph! You are not polite!" --is not very interesting either. I would like artists to take their role in the culture more seriously--or have sharper senses of humor. These are life and death times. Elephant poop just doesn't cut it as political satire. And a tedious and ultimately homely medium like so-called "crop art" will persuade no one of much of anything. ak
Jill Yablonski04:40pm
Sep 22
Ann, I am sorry you did not find my response interesting, but that's not really what I was striving for. Please do note one of the commenting artists did point out they (the crop artists themselves) are certainly no hipsters. It is presumptuous to assume they are making a condescending mockery of art and patting themselves on the back for doing so. I'm certainly naive in the art criticism world, but I really did appreciate Rich admitting to casting aside his self-professed snootiness and just casually enjoying the art, kitsch or not. I'm quite sure he or I won't convince anyone else to do so necessarily, but it's worth trying. You know? Just enjoying something for the sake of enjoying it. But I suppose that would render critics useless. I did, of course, recognize the lawn remark as an attempt at a joke. Thanks very much for acknowledging my right to find it not funny. Yay! The Vicious Circle sparks discourse just as it was intended. Nice work to you all.
Rich Barlow07:42pm
Sep 22
I am glad to see that one of my posts has led to some interesting comments, and flattered to hear that you have liked my writing in the past. (I am also hoping that it is the content, not the writing, that you have a problem with here - and that sometimes good writing/content will elicit as much dialogue). I feel that my writing must have been unclear, however, if you have managed to come away thinking that I believe this work is being "done in earnest, so to speak, by Middle Americans, that is, Good Country Folk." Let me be clear: I do not believe this. In my post I did admit to having thought that in passing, when first encountering the work (bear in mind, these first encounters were in my teen years). This may be because I am an immigrant who has only ever lived in metropolitan areas, and I actually was at that time misreading the work and its authors. Perhaps it was foolish to include so much of my own failures of understanding. I would like to think that I made clear, though, that in writing this piece I *knew* or at least suspected that this was a misreading of the work, and was admitting to that fact and how it started me thinking about how the work enters the world, and how the possibility of a misreading could lead to the political statements being received differently than a lot of other art with similar content. I have no interest in condescending to "Imaginary Country Others." In fact, I was hoping to point to how entirely mythological this imaginary other is, and how much power its myth has over our national political discourse. I could be wrong. Hopefully you enjoy the next post more.
Lisa L (not verified)11:56am
Sep 24
Ann Klefstad asserts that Lillian Colton‘s work is “boring as art”, that crop art is “really dull”, and that if people choose to waste their time they should waste it “in a way that made for interesting conversation“. Yet here‘s an interesting conversation about crop art! Ironic, isn’t it? And I have to say that I heard a number of interesting conversations in the horticulture building when I took my-out-of-town guests to the state fair (and when I went again with friends who live locally). These animated overheard conversations were both about the content of the pieces and the materials and techniques used. I watched as people leaned in close to see how the seeds used were placed, marveling at the variety of seeds available, the details achieved, and the time and patience it must have taken. There was also quite a bit of reminiscing about pieces done in past years. There is no doubt that visitors to the state fair really, really like the crop art display and find it interesting for a number of reasons. But Ann has declared that this manifestation of wasted time and energy is “work that will bring nothing about in the world other than a little mutual backpatting and some preening at one’s own goodhumored cleverness”. Ouch! Couldn’t the same be said for many of the pieces in the Fine Arts Building? I have to wonder what Ann is really responding to, why she feels she needs to attack the talented (and patient!) people who choose to use their talents creating crop art for an annual event in this dismissive way. Is it because the political pieces are left-leaning? I don’t know what Ann’s political views are, not being familiar with her work; I only know that she sarcastically suggested that the artists go door knocking for Obama. (I also know that some of them are doing exactly that!) Is it the medium? Is it the time it takes to create these pieces? I’m sorry that Ann’s life growing up in “deep country” was so devoid of whimsy and time for pleasurable activity, that the grownups spent their time doing only what was necessary or what they were driven to by “personal obsession” (there’s a story there). Ann writes that she would like to see “artists take their role in the culture more seriously“. Why so serious? Aren’t satire and humor a wonderfully effective way to get people talking about issues? Aren’t using satire and humor a healthy way to cope with, and respond to, the bizarre and ridiculous things that are happening in our world? (In addition to getting out and door knocking for Obama, of course.) I have to wonder what an art show Ann might jury would look like. “These are life and death times,” she writes. Yes, they are. Yes, they are. And we have to find a way to get through them with some sense of optimism and purpose, without despairing and buckling to fear again. The last eight years should never have happened, but they did. I, for one, am grateful to people who spend their time creating art with a clever message that responds to the times, that attracts so much attention, and that is technically so well wrought. That crop art uses seeds available locally as a medium just adds my appreciation of it.
Ann Klefstad (not verified)10:54pm
Oct 7
What am I really responding to? The fact that I find crop art boring. I am certainly no closet rightwinger. I'm going doorknocking for Obama myself, and recently attended a party of women for Obama thrown by a local humorist. My sense of humor is unimpaired, which is why I found the lame excuses for humor in the seed samplers presented so dull.
Jill Yablonski07:43am
Oct 8
Good for you, Ann, doing your part, attending parties and all. And presumably un-dull ones at that!
Teresa Anderson (not verified)05:13pm
Sep 22
Jill--thanks for your thoughtful posts! Ann--you are entitled to your opinions, but you are way off-base in your assumptions about the purpose behind crop art and the individuals who create it. We are not “preening,” “condescending,” “self-indulgent” “artists” ridiculing “Good Country People.” We are lawyers and epidemiologists and editors and schoolchildren and retirees who (once a year) make a piece of crop art to enter in the state fair like other people enter a knitted sweater or a jar of jam. The purpose of the crop art competition is to educate viewers about agriculture in Minnesota and the complicated rules about permissible seeds illustrate this (http://www.mnstatefair.org/2008_pdf/AG08-web.pdf). If you think using seeds to make a picture somehow insults farmers, direct your anger at the Minnesota State Fair instead of the people participating in this competition.
james jones (not verified)09:23pm
Aug 1

the minn state fair is so fun to go to. I just thinking about the memories now. Thanks for the great story.
boulder mortgage broker
colorado springs mortgage broker
denver mortgage broker

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <i> <b> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
By entering in the words in the captcha image, you help us prevent automated spam submissions and keep the site tidy.

Blogs

Sports

Baseball:
Warning Track Power by Alex Halsted
Sports:
On the Ball by Britt Robson

Society

Weather:
Dude Weather by Jimmy Gaines

A&E

Fiction:
Write Now! by Terry Faust

Retired

Hockey:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Style:
Hook & Eye
Misc:
Is This News?
Fiction:
Yo, Ivanhoe by Brad Zellar
Food:
Consider the Egg by Stephanie March
Wine:
Beyond the Cask
Food:
Food Fight!
Media:
To the Slaughter
Misc:
Outrage by Staff
Food:
Chef's Table
Guest Commentary:
Just Passing Through
Humor:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Cars:
Road Rake by Chris Birt
Commentary:
Read Menace by Tom Bartel
Society:
The Adventures of Melinda by Melinda Jacobs
Politics:
Defenestrator by Rich Goldsmith
Food:
Breaking Bread by Jeremy Iggers & Ann Bauer
Books:
Cracking Spines by Max Ross
Music:
Hear, Hear by Staff
Art:
The Vicious Circle by 6 Critics
Secrets:
Secrets of the Day by Kate Iverson
Theater:
Seen in the City by Staff
Film:
Talk About Talkies by Staff